Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:58381) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TZN57-0002Cs-EO; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:39:52 -0800 Received: by mail-ob0-f189.google.com with SMTP id eh20sf1815125obb.16 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:39:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Qe6v/hcIleaodI0ysUXnCTdEebQLonuuvk62aVBuk7k=; b=nOln+WgEaCbcb6iq3NeJWRmSYZH4DavFOsbXRzH2cCkuhggW1pJQUxHzYVlUNaYFai bpp/GW+iCMLlEfvQDWm2EIqwGF2XllMglxQ9uHCFEZgxXDBXyRNd0fPdRm/t4JrE8BAj D0fRdqmmyJMBaohW+da7WBaf3m6rYDhH1/AFTi4T7dJTWCYJK+fyX5kyPo3CVDzrlKud vn4o6/PcGNi/WB/kqp5mW2SnZ2Y5cvjQtrpspTliBfVUsuLEKdtGWCSaSZLnriEcB9MH IOSQuxCjIXkOxFdfrXZEHrOv2YsFSE043LbaoEf52Is5cAuZdlhWM4VjBJ41/ECRjI75 uczw== Received: by 10.182.54.112 with SMTP id i16mr189240obp.38.1353076779092; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:39:39 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.23.7 with SMTP id i7ls420315obf.46.gmail; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.146.7 with SMTP id sy7mr189873obb.30.1353076777777; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:39:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:39:37 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <9cc8cae2-03f8-48c6-85f0-c77cb5d49e35@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_78_24603710.1353076777126" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_78_24603710.1353076777126 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There are two possible scenarios. 1. We wait until someone finishes CLL 1.1 published on http://github.com/dag/cll 2. We start writing CLL 2.0 now and only then convert it to a publishable format *Now what are advantages and disadvantages ?* 1. Advantages: a. We get a printable book and the LLG can publish it and get some money. 2. Advantages: a. We develop the language much more quickly, solve unsettled issues and then publish this renewed CLL which will be enthusiastically accepted by the world community zo'oru'e My personal opinion is that if the CLL 1.1 can be completed within a year or so then I'd certainly accepted scenario #1. But let's face it: it's not been developed for more than 5 months now. And if we start writing CLL 2.0 now* in a wiki* we can include special tags that would be ignored by the wiki rendering engine but used later when we export it to DocBook or whatever. So now I wanna hear your opinions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/HoxMvRkREl4J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_78_24603710.1353076777126 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There are two possible scenarios.

1. We wait until someo= ne finishes CLL 1.1 published on http://github.com/dag/cll
2. We = start writing CLL 2.0 now and only then convert it to a publishable format<= /div>

Now what are advantages and disadvantages ?=
1. Advantages:
a. We get a printable book and the LLG = can publish it and get some money.

2. Advantages:&= nbsp;
a. We develop the language much more quickly, solve unsettl= ed issues and then publish this renewed CLL which will be enthusiastically = accepted by the world community zo'oru'e


My personal opinion is that if the CLL 1.1 can be completed within a = year or so then I'd certainly accepted scenario #1.
But let's fac= e it: it's not been developed for more than 5 months now.
And if = we start writing CLL 2.0 now in a wiki we can include special tags t= hat would be ignored by the wiki rendering engine but used later when we ex= port it to DocBook or whatever.


So = now I wanna hear your opinions.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Ho= xMvRkREl4J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_78_24603710.1353076777126--