Received: from mail-yh0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:63081)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCOJVK5DTQPRB2H3TGCQKGQENPNN5UY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TZQ80-0003vP-CV; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:55:06 -0800
Received: by mail-yh0-f61.google.com with SMTP id o21sf477315yho.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:54:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references
         :from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=JW1tgA4TrSxYBgz7heJzF1ntFb1v9igdX/ReW/afG4s=;
        b=xUaOhvKazeemE9AAbkyBDC4Pi5ud0KBcrh+NX2reLmsOPHutzPexQq7mSzoiUaUT7u
         35xwLIrSO3AfuoSU+I7ZKV3nrlK+KzXcqPlfKcLRfhG1dPGgS/xt5PVicT7wt7OWmP/g
         khf94ieCUGVkDGh5FRRV+jIdyAu0c0dfJDxNSzzlIwjacZ8rleNnDLIGDmYXOFwRuLpu
         5UVrf7nEOSfWtp56sukYJc93Q8s7z+LQyM6YhWShyK5A2ElR72dVvmuP+P4DL2RtJzwC
         wq5jjzdmS7BkCyTNWCTh3oE/sBTCxZ7/CItgXJlIpkJfYohF0rw2m4m+g9fN0mBBX7tm
         Judw==
Received: by 10.50.151.175 with SMTP id ur15mr1741165igb.0.1353088489504;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:54:49 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.106.229 with SMTP id gx5ls1096189igb.3.gmail; Fri, 16 Nov
 2012 09:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.85.130 with SMTP id h2mr1046302paz.8.1353088487903;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.85.130 with SMTP id h2mr1046301paz.8.1353088487894;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com (mail-pa0-f49.google.com [209.85.220.49])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id js4si398248pbb.2.2012.11.16.09.54.47
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jacfold.guskant@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.49;
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id bi5so2094995pad.8
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.69.16.100 with SMTP id fv4mr5978532pbd.135.1353088487780; Fri,
 16 Nov 2012 09:54:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.208.98 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:54:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <03532cda-acab-4671-b84d-ed741c6bfc28@googlegroups.com>
References: <CAO1AUJOpN0MmnFebc0mRNpvNGoukLLOp_PDWYW5Sm-qoxiDnSw@mail.gmail.com>
 <03532cda-acab-4671-b84d-ed741c6bfc28@googlegroups.com>
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:54:26 +0900
Message-ID: <CADbVZP_tofKSuKY21oy9UR3MjsxAw4+SZXRQ=NESspskyNWPZw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo {ko'oi} of UI6 as imperativity
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jacfold.guskant@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.49 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=jacfold.guskant@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

2012/11/17 la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>:
> There was a thread on {xa'e} sev. months ago (actually I started it) with
> someone replying that {.e'i} is the solution.
>

I don't think {.e'i} implies {.e'a}. I need a broader term than the
attitudinals {au}, {a'o}, {e'o}, {e'u}, {e'a} and {ei}.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.