Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:52074)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCOJVK5DTQPRBA4NTOCQKGQE5FXRYJA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TZUxm-0005ZR-Lh; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:04:59 -0800
Received: by mail-vc0-f189.google.com with SMTP id fl17sf2073448vcb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:04:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject
         :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=pyN9wneMy2n5cA+vzEysJiCIwB2d5jljgvIsuLKYr6U=;
        b=fNORarUQxnBg5zhzO7A7w09fL2ndVC4VSOJPWlBJBs1Aew8TyondBVdmNRpCaLC6pn
         vYJL0nJ6QpvN7NzZQA08H+Uie3ULDrUayjJwS/t846WQ+l1g2YjUG13WEDPnqJHPNT6e
         qr9iqV7MiPHzPBeYHddBAGKDTqzeJ2DOHfiOF7dxBlXc2R+M4gz9MavKe8x1DOkVFzkT
         mEEGQcqkaMugMNnDnCduz/g9p7VRNt4+u3vqfNT5H9R/m6lXJjeTPCa55Yh8TFvqJ1sb
         tsjPTxNxxDdEI56V0I5cfSrL0Rug+FYNkgVecy8/0ILqw7C91LkJCb3YywLvZWbso535
         gMkA==
Received: by 10.50.37.242 with SMTP id b18mr77536igk.6.1353107075692;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:04:35 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.140.37 with SMTP id rd5ls1295348igb.2.gmail; Fri, 16 Nov
 2012 15:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.0.65 with SMTP id nl1mr5093671icb.23.1353107075096;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.0.65 with SMTP id nl1mr5093670icb.23.1353107075084;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com (mail-ie0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si247623iga.1.2012.11.16.15.04.35
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gusni.kantu@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.170;
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c12so4095343ieb.15
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.34.200 with SMTP id b8mr167831igj.52.1353107074879; Fri, 16
 Nov 2012 15:04:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.79.196 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:04:14 -0800 (PST)
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 08:04:14 +0900
Message-ID: <CAO1AUJNnMtme39ep-nLMOuxtM-foYsX1SXvns6PALpJxuePxCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] Vote for {xa'e} as UI6 (pu "experimental cmavo {ko'oi} of
 UI6 as imperativity")
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of gusni.kantu@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.170 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=gusni.kantu@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 5:33 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 16.11.2012 18:39, schrieb guskant:
>
>> How do you think about {ko'oi}? Any comments will be appreciated.
>
>
> Since xa'e as LAhE is quite awkward, I have proposed to move it to UI. UI
> are easier to handle and more flexible. I added an alternate definition for
> xa'e on jbovlaste which only needs more votes to become the preferred one.
> I'm not sure we need two different cmavo.
>

OK, I voted for {xa'e} as UI6.
http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/xa'e

However, as I mentioned in the first message of this thread, it can
qualify not only a smuti but also two sentences connected with ijek:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:39 AM, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 3) do .onai ko'oi lo mi speni co'a morsi
> 3-1) do co'a morsi .ijonai ko'oi lo mi speni co'a morsi
but your definition of {xa'e} mentions only a sumti. The definition
may need to be improved.

How would be a Lojbanic definition of {xa'e} as UI6? Do you accept the
following selsku that I added to jbovlaste?

tcita lo se cusku le du'u la'e vo'e te minde ja se cpedu ja se curmi
ja se pacna ja se stidi ja se djica ja se bilga

I will improve it if necessary.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.