Received: from mail-ia0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:36974) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta7Nx-00081l-5K; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:06:30 -0800 Received: by mail-ia0-f189.google.com with SMTP id b35sf1239399iac.16 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:06:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=SG2RmEhN3VhH0Auq0tr5pfn2Z1XL7N0KRfJVToQfXC8=; b=ExGzZKc8ek3IJpL3awWNBFfMTogBW+Y4uN3fOvFD8eZKTK5JIRFq4QYZUbN1jMadtd KTTtKsZsuPOqSrosUBBFb5qi6HZBEZ585hvNq/DVeCtmUK3mKlb3UMGIvsUmvkneJ0Hp xURcnFcY8BDBmoEjUdjQWNTw1tdJMMNBTmHkCMl0MRXZ/DKT156U50CBc58oxxGBj4D6 6HsZVxo4cotYW+wTXdaU6IsWi+L26RcgRNkUxa6cqrZHHeE/2BodGh6Nje2Kl9T1SJwt 98GwxMeKICQ1XMU6QksNdwB2qQWFGg3d4kuOW/Z/Ix1pKEFNK/LX/SUsr85xmMobEZtY /MJg== Received: by 10.49.6.36 with SMTP id x4mr2027824qex.30.1353254770268; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:06:10 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.131.41 with SMTP id oj9ls1857495qeb.77.gmail; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:06:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.116.193 with SMTP id jy1mr1952318qeb.2.1353254768810; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:06:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:06:07 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <9cc8cae2-03f8-48c6-85f0-c77cb5d49e35@googlegroups.com> <20121116164912.GH25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com> <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_361_20216315.1353254767837" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_361_20216315.1353254767837 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sunday, November 18, 2012 5:12:53 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:46:32AM -0800, la gleki wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, November 16, 2012 8:49:14 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 06:39:37AM -0800, la gleki wrote: > > > > There are two possible scenarios. > > > > > > > > 1. We wait until someone finishes CLL 1.1 published on > > > > http://github.com/dag/cll > > > > > > > > 2. We start writing CLL 2.0 now and only then convert it to a > > > > publishable format > > > > > > Who the hell is "we"? What do "we" intend to change, exactly? > > > > > > > We are the community, those that would like to advance lojban to a > > finished state. > > Really? Because I've been begging for help for something like 5 > years, in a wide variety of endeavours, and mostly gotten nothing. > > But if you want to go write some detailed modifications to the > current CLL, you should feel free, and if they're any good I'll use > them. Just don't make it look official. > Who else can currently develop it, even if not for free? > -Robin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Q7L7XDgnNrYJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_361_20216315.1353254767837 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sunday, November 18, 2012 5:12:53 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:46:32AM -0800, la gleki wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, November 16, 2012 8:49:14 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 06:39:37AM -0800, la gleki wrote:
> > > There are two possible scenarios.
> > >
> > > 1. We wait until someone finishes CLL 1.1 published on
> > > http://github.com/dag/cll
> > >
> > > 2. We start writing CLL 2.0 now and only then convert it to a
> > > publishable format
> >
> > Who the hell is "we"?  What do "we" intend to change, exactly?
> >
>
> We are the community, those that would like to advance lojban to a
> finished state.

Really?  Because I've been begging for help for something like 5
years, in a wide variety of endeavours, and mostly gotten nothing.

But if you want to go write some detailed modifications to the
current CLL, you should feel free, and if they're any good I'll use
them.  Just don't make it look official.

Who else can currently develop it, even if not for free?


-Robin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Q7L7XDgnNrYJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
------=_Part_361_20216315.1353254767837--