Received: from mail-ea0-f189.google.com ([209.85.215.189]:48658) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TaAyP-0000ma-7x; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:56:19 -0800 Received: by mail-ea0-f189.google.com with SMTP id e11sf1507362eaa.16 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:56:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TMjb1JKqVSjeE2u4VfZ/4PJvStWWZT6h8oVov0bUolQ=; b=JXSj72Eo7fR7d8VerPmeqaI0qT/9kvvYmJxCtRxiK8rbM92gZi4M2uG79SlMV0M014 voCzcacODvuK1ZMXjuHboP6rjVrSWtkuwjTTOZ1t2eykaz+tYzEgOIrKZ/fMdW6PMgn1 +iUe2lKEBzpVD+vM6Iy4Ym2jT0lRnGD5dB/4e3RCeHKVurYUXY7ddosFGikL93FWcMRJ 2bbcqpS31PxK/mqlBm2dcWtfEzmdJrNr6sX/GBzPEEj96BRYYovFX5kChLJs9ZcF0o/c dLZjFOkx/Ffdv3jEGRbw5OV5dICHSdyRsEuWG0T3vg6/+fJmbiPwnoD9Lp1CAMM+WpfH vpLg== Received: by 10.180.105.229 with SMTP id gp5mr612241wib.13.1353268561488; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:56:01 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.80.193 with SMTP id t1ls1260664wix.9.canary; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.204.3 with SMTP id g3mr5142998eeo.7.1353268560411; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.204.3 with SMTP id g3mr5142997eeo.7.1353268560400; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.23]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id u8si1901845een.1.2012.11.18.11.56.00; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2012 19:30:38 -0000 Received: from p5DDC4179.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.100]) [93.220.65.121] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 18 Nov 2012 20:30:38 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX183OPh5VVU3/FbWGrfSZvwEU8GACGyceGhxNgjxO0 ZUKXvgDrJwxwtr Message-ID: <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:30:37 +0100 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? References: <9cc8cae2-03f8-48c6-85f0-c77cb5d49e35@googlegroups.com> <20121116164912.GH25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com> <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com> <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Am 18.11.2012 19:48, schrieb Robin Lee Powell: > There are probably 20 people on this list with most or all of the > requisite skills. No idea which if them would take money for it; > I've offered, and gotten no reply. Is anyone currently working on it? I can understand gleki's frustration, and I can also understand yours. I=20 don't really understand how so many people just prefer to watch=20 passively what happens. The BPFK has done a lot of great work already,=20 it's a shame it completely ran out of steam. I don't think a single person alone can get much done, and I also doubt=20 that anyone would want a single person to make all their decisions for=20 them, especially in a language as Lojban, where we still have a=20 considerable amount of things that must be discussed before they can=20 become official. Don't people want to have a say in it? If yes, then=20 they must speak up, offer their help, get involved or else they must=20 accept that they can't complain about any decisions that are being made=20 without them. What is the community's general opinion about the current state of=20 affairs? Are people generally happy to wait and stay in this gray area=20 between old and new Lojban? We get lots of newbies on IRC and each one of them reminds us of the=20 fact that we don't have a single up-do-date, official description of our=20 language. We have to tell each time that they can learn from the CLL or=20 Lojban for Beginners, but that there are several outdated things in=20 those materials. Is it not in everyone's interest that people new to the=20 language get welcomed by proper learning materials? There are countless cases of dicussions, both on this list and on IRC=20 about issues that some people believe are already solved but which=20 others believe are unsettled. There is lots of mutual disagreement and=20 even more confusion and obscurity because there is such a huge contrast=20 between old and new cmavo definitions, for instance. This is just a report of the current situation the way I experience it.=20 Mainly, I'm confused about people's motivations. I know that some years ago, some people agreed to make you (rlpowell)=20 the Benevolent Dictator, but what were they thinking? Did they just want=20 to free themselves of any responsibilities? A single person can in no=20 way do all of this without getting overwhelmed, and it seems that is=20 exactly what has happened. What do people think about this now? I'm not sure what the best solution is, or what step must be taken next.=20 All I'm seeing is that we're stuck. In my opinion, we (and by "we" I=20 mean everyone who wants to participate) should make sure that the=20 docbook project gets finished as soon as possible and then we must=20 immediately reactivate the BPFK. If there are, as you say, 20 people on this list that could help with=20 the docbook project, then those people are urged to speak up. We need=20 you! If you haven't yet noticed, some of us are desperate enough to pay=20 you for this job. For what it's worth, gleki is talking about CLL2.0 because he's doubting=20 that there will ever be a completed CLL1.1 at this rate and he considers=20 the CLL1.1 relatively useless because it would still be outdated, which=20 is true, of course. xorlo and dotside are by far not the only changes. He and I were merely wondering how to move Lojban forward. One idea was=20 to give up on CLL1.1 and get straight to the actual CLL2.0 that=20 incorporates *every* change, not just xorlo and dotside. I told him that=20 this is not an easy thing to do because we must discuss these changes=20 together as a community, no single person has the right to make changes=20 without the approval of at least some notable Lojbanists. When I told you about this idea some time ago, you made it very clear to=20 me that it would be a terrible idea to start already so I did nothing=20 about it. The only way for this to be a useful idea is to have enough=20 people of the old BPFK team coming together and finishing off the=20 remaining issues (of which there are of course quite a few). Then, to=20 create the actual CLL, all we need to do is get the old CLL on a wiki=20 and make changes to it accordingly. Everyone who understands what=20 they're doing can help at that point. Then once all the changes have=20 been worked in, a team will read over everything and double and triple=20 check. And probably some final dicussions will ensue, but the goal will=20 be near by then. That's my vision anyway. I've probably written enough now; those are my=20 spontaneously-written-down but for-some-time-had thoughts, no more and=20 no less. If anyone has anything useful to say, please do so. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i --=20 pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku . . --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.