Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:62093)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDNZFNNFVAHRBPEGUWCQKGQEJUUBEII@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TaBMq-0000ro-50; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:36 -0800
Received: by mail-ee0-f61.google.com with SMTP id b57sf1505967eek.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=sg6M5b5Uik4R5KKwKDQ6B8hNaEvXslPCUQMuTVNPNWI=;
        b=X+rzDiLqPHvkdGTIeqQ5agf9aJ8gQJh2oLhYttWbwhbygeghiw7leLjtkWWkc2f/Pt
         +nyegJvX7xODFv8q24Rb5sxkHhfhIx60wFOSu/zo9PVlX0bNghix3YG8k79rweMFl0vg
         d6mM5P4I8V/Tv3VFcEbKMe4pfhor80jP/A2aL8lip42XD2SkKvuSouIlTeTMRpEWmSzk
         HrEsndgZsYVLPnqoA90Cz5iHAt+5yJ3UxhPPh/1F6gj1ghBxdr2Yp7FbbujLGF2jxoxx
         9lpUKkYwMJKNZrbYPlizq+mhlt6p9ojT5qQ6g0ROWH8XzPTPFLqkfr03cqs/jRJvxC4u
         e02w==
Received: by 10.180.89.105 with SMTP id bn9mr625389wib.10.1353270076535;
        Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:16 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.101.133 with SMTP id fg5ls1160535wib.34.gmail; Sun, 18 Nov
 2012 12:21:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.216.197 with SMTP id g45mr5174328eep.3.1353270076016;
        Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.216.197 with SMTP id g45mr5174327eep.3.1353270076004;
        Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com (mail-ea0-f175.google.com [209.85.215.175])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u8si1912260een.1.2012.11.18.12.21.15
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:16 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.175;
Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h11so1869317eaa.20
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.209.6 with SMTP id r6mr17051199eeo.34.1353270075922;
        Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.73] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s1sm19669030eem.9.2012.11.18.12.21.12
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50A94337.4060506@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:21:11 +0000
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?
References: <9cc8cae2-03f8-48c6-85f0-c77cb5d49e35@googlegroups.com> <20121116164912.GH25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com> <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com> <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de>
X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

selpa'i, On 18/11/2012 19:30:
> The only way for this to be a useful idea is to have enough people of
> the old BPFK team coming together and finishing off the remaining
> issues (of which there are of course quite a few).

Why the old BPFK team? There seem to be active newcomers such as you and Ja=
cob Errington who understand the issues and would have been on the BPFK had=
 you been around ten years ago. I was on the original BPFK team, but nowada=
ys I wouldn't have the time or commitment to do more than vote on already w=
orked-out proposals -- i.e. not for working-out and debating proposals. Far=
 better chances of progress if the job is given to the likes of you and Jac=
ob. (I should add that I have no idea who either of you are; I just observe=
 that you both post clueful messages to Lojban list.)

--And.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.