Received: from mail-lb0-f189.google.com ([209.85.217.189]:62051) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TaBv0-0000zM-Oc; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:56:58 -0800 Received: by mail-lb0-f189.google.com with SMTP id gg13sf407186lbb.16 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:56:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9gpHUhnTmWVIIlXUN5b7CqjnaJTOBweWyITXRvQCSBg=; b=ZNtV9d1qb75c9mdeYxtoaEWvf6ok1x+agglbYOI4s7Dm1sTDdY6OyaLExNJa82/c4U /RBnAq0TN0RIDVzDLnthQ+bitjFnjkJZxPKtp0re7s1KG8OUJXJpDk8xWz41GMctgb9A 9qHSm9nmgrrdwpW9SxhopzcHgOQrPi+JaPO1mh3BseaOiHrfZn09Y34D1vDLkI4OTr4W y6Icmu4AOaoWnBwVCl1bkiuR9vDriN66JyekuKe0nb/xZyWzztejiBGULyasM5KGTveF E0kFx2t/9tUV5Xg1FBANimSAWmCJ78aU47273jCdsY5Ues0FLGVenWCpZBiWBOETyOPd vDow== Received: by 10.180.102.130 with SMTP id fo2mr644611wib.2.1353272194870; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:56:34 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.99.65 with SMTP id eo1ls1265009wib.25.gmail; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.216.197 with SMTP id g45mr5214054eep.3.1353272193438; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.216.197 with SMTP id g45mr5214053eep.3.1353272193420; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.22]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id u8si1927982een.1.2012.11.18.12.56.33; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.22; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2012 20:54:08 -0000 Received: from p5DDC4179.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.100]) [93.220.65.121] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 18 Nov 2012 21:54:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/uAKEoj2PumM77WcVnE6S44oJ/gJQdNNAPerBkhx C7ZhpQIeUHhKSX Message-ID: <50A94AF1.6090009@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:54:09 +0100 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? References: <9cc8cae2-03f8-48c6-85f0-c77cb5d49e35@googlegroups.com> <20121116164912.GH25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com> <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com> <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de> <50A94337.4060506@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50A94337.4060506@gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Am 18.11.2012 21:21, schrieb And Rosta: > selpa'i, On 18/11/2012 19:30: >> The only way for this to be a useful idea is to have enough people of >> the old BPFK team coming together and finishing off the remaining >> issues (of which there are of course quite a few). > > Why the old BPFK team? There seem to be active newcomers such as you and > Jacob Errington who understand the issues and would have been on the > BPFK had you been around ten years ago. I was on the original BPFK team, > but nowadays I wouldn't have the time or commitment to do more than vote > on already worked-out proposals -- i.e. not for working-out and debating > proposals. Far better chances of progress if the job is given to the > likes of you and Jacob. (I should add that I have no idea who either of > you are; I just observe that you both post clueful messages to Lojban > list.) You're right, of course it would have to be a team of active members,=20 but we don't need to create a new "taskforce", we can still call them=20 the BPFK, just with a different list of people. I am hoping at least=20 some of the old members are still available and willing to help out. We=20 need people like xorxes. I certainly want to be on the BPFK team (or on whatever team that makes=20 decisions together) and I asked rlpowell if I could become a member some=20 time ago, but he told me there was no use in that, since it was=20 basically a dead committee. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i --=20 pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku . . --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.