Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:48098) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TaQDN-0005Si-7N; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:13:08 -0800 Received: by mail-gg0-f189.google.com with SMTP id q1sf1531876ggm.16 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:12:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g+ufGCicXz32tZwf9MgZIKMs7PtqGv7hBE95p2PmQq0=; b=TJJ3tD7ndiSyVtuj/LBH2+oG/k9iFtPeKdjazw11K8ZmuuPy3cftkIFyoMGS5pI8Vn EpQv+r0OgOKewFLmuPsUlwvFBVDklIwRgT8UnCCwwkCPzecQkv0WN3XLTdVRuJn8azbl DPZFk7lQHpmRR9pEo1OnGVZ7H+B23/bKZNOWVAZS/eiyCVePmOVadXOl1XjtXMkH+euN 9AwDjRmlJVSEZUtrftsMzqKLk8MIX2Ab1AMMEaTT4JkIcmi1wi7sRE09evrFXusxbzQi FYrYu8HmQU06mbnaBwhgFIPPiP05IFdwCr5Q/rMKY/W0cQ+iwGvhIrZvTGs4FPAbARNp WIvw== Received: by 10.50.207.42 with SMTP id lt10mr2127637igc.6.1353327128784; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:12:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.178.72 with SMTP id cw8ls2741953igc.39.gmail; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.85.105 with SMTP id g9mr2942414paz.18.1353327127475; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.85.105 with SMTP id g9mr2942411paz.18.1353327127448; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.22]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id m8si1495903pav.2.2012.11.19.04.12.06; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.22; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2012 12:12:05 -0000 Received: from p5DDC4421.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.100]) [93.220.68.33] by mail.gmx.net (mp070) with SMTP; 19 Nov 2012 13:12:05 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+WuBUBuKyWxKeVTQHxzyP0g7nqg4DGOi/oTGsxls 7hMsi6uBuXHhzg Message-ID: <50AA2215.3030502@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:12:05 +0100 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? References: <9cc8cae2-03f8-48c6-85f0-c77cb5d49e35@googlegroups.com> <20121116164912.GH25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com> <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com> <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / .i la .aionys. cu cusku di'e > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:30 PM, selpa'i > wrote: > > Am 18.11.2012 19:48, schrieb Robin Lee Powell: > > There are probably 20 people on this list with most or all of the > requisite skills. No idea which if them would take money for it; > I've offered, and gotten no reply. > > > Is anyone currently working on it? > > > No. the last commit was on Aug 12. I haven't personally been working on > it, with the excuse that I've got school stuff right now. > > I can understand gleki's frustration, and I can also understand > yours. I don't really understand how so many people just prefer to > watch passively what happens. The BPFK has done a lot of great work > already, it's a shame it completely ran out of steam. > > > I don't think the BPFK has run out of steam per se. I'll note that the > BPFK mailing list is apparently dead, and it's members as a whole don't > do much, but the /job/ of the BPFK is still getting done, by those of us > that care about whatever issue we're bringing up to discuss. Problems > are being found, opinions are being floated, decisions are being made. Actually, decisions aren't really being made. Most discussions just end=20 in dead silence, nothing ever gets announced as an official solution,=20 and almost nothing gets a note on the tiki. > Speaking of, I think that anyone who wants to get issues solved and > changes made, should apply to join the BPFK list and start talking on > it. The entire reason for the existence of that list is to discuss > issues and make decisions. Not sure if that's (still) true. We could give it a try, of course. > If I were to guess, I'd say most people are to busy learning and using > Lojban to spend any time on the decision making, issue discussion bits. People are busy *using* Lojban? Who? Where? It is true that many are=20 struggling with learning it. > We get lots of newbies on IRC and each one of them reminds us of the > fact that we don't have a single up-do-date, official description of > our language. We have to tell each time that they can learn from the > CLL or Lojban for Beginners, but that there are several outdated > things in those materials. Is it not in everyone's interest that > people new to the language get welcomed by proper learning materials? > > > Of course it is. That's why it's so important that the CLL1.1 is > finished. The big thing about CLL1.1 is that one of its design > parameters is making it easier to maintain and update than the original > CLL, so that keeping it up to date with any changes to the language is > simple and relatively painless. The other major point is that it be easy > to deliver in a variety of formats, so that the same source can be used > to automagically generate a web site, pdf, print book, etc. etc. Yes, very useful and desirable. I again welcome anyone who is willing to=20 help to speak up and accept our money. > > What do people think about this now? > > > I'm still in total support of this. It's very much like the U.S.A. > system of government in some respects, where those of us who give a crap > about one issue or another discuss it, debate it, argue about it, and so > on until we've figured out what we think is the best solution for it, > and then Robin decides whether or not to veto our solution. More often > than not he agrees, and to the best of my knowledge he never exercises > his decision-making power without being fully informed. I agree. However I think it's too much to ask of one person. And now he=20 is a father and understandably very very short on time and energy. Maybe=20 new circumstances require new methods. > I don't think a wiki is the appropriate format for the CLL. For one > thing, changes should only be made to the CLL when they have officially > been decided on, which means only select few people should have write > access, not everyone and their dog. Of course not, but it's not likely that "anyone's dog" will make use of=20 write access. We don't usually have many volunteers for anything. I=20 expect that only those that really want to help would help. > For another, a wiki isn't easily > converted into other delivery modes, AFAIK, and the deisre is for the > CLL to be available as /at least/ a web site, a pdf, and a print book, > which is why CLL1.1 is being encoded in LaTeX and hosted in a git > repository: being in LaTeX makes it easy to print the same material in a > large variety of formats, including but not limited to the ones I've > mentioned, and being in a git repo makes it very easy to submit changes > to the CLL on an as needed basis. Yes, but the point of the wiki would be to. One could also use google=20 docs instead. Just something that allows multiple people to put together=20 a written description in one place for the future CLL. Once the text(s)=20 are good and complete, they would be transferred to the docbook, which=20 maybe by then is ready for it. It's just an idea. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i --=20 pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku . . --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.