Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:57076) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TaXvp-0001DK-Na; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:27:20 -0800 Received: by mail-vb0-f61.google.com with SMTP id fs19sf751204vbb.16 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:26:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=qYS81+cNl9HVZwxN4Y0GZQKAmEL49ynxmWnIRYU5AfQ=; b=GXJeclY+RVdpscYVv5OLmvn1fOvoKM8o9OYcD5xvogX+SbuL6KV56ch5XZs8YlpuqJ FDuyioC5CYSozpWsgmMfciDIgips0KcHKRG+y7xAI3JsZ6kj3o1SeMjFfAWTK072fx2z Xl6HpGY3AHq/eiGaW/0uN0A5l2XhVNWUZeo51L3+8Lkb876ebDhdQG+ILtk4YSwq83My ech0QqPq2N9lhHVdID02B+u8zRCv2t4KeNR2K01WoVt7mCm/3jJ8M3IjagM3IMxOMZB6 leyjiXAjhhePFznTlTdjSf0A3iYrqaNAFcuirCdXwWzTp5+2AaVA3c2ZuWpSRGrwZDI2 iFPw== Received: by 10.50.169.103 with SMTP id ad7mr3024353igc.2.1353356814786; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:26:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.7.199 with SMTP id l7ls3618856iga.1.gmail; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.85.168 with SMTP id i8mr3372027paz.21.1353356813833; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.85.168 with SMTP id i8mr3372026paz.21.1353356813823; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id js4si1754883pbb.2.2012.11.19.12.26.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TaXvg-0001DG-Rn for lojban@googlegroups.com; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:26:52 -0800 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:26:52 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? Message-ID: <20121119202652.GB3564@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com> <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com> <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de> <50AA2215.3030502@gmx.de> <20121119185210.GM28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50AA9461.4020707@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50AA9461.4020707@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:19:45PM +0000, And Rosta wrote: > Robin Lee Powell, On 19/11/2012 18:52: > >Oh, and that the PDF needs to be something we can send to a > >printer to make a book out of, so (in particular) cross > >references need to be page number based (which is why we can't > >just print the HTML, or anything converted from it; I haven't > >found anything that produces page number xrefs from html, much as > >I'd *LOVE* to solve the whole thing that way). > > If the book's subsections are sufficiently short, wouldn't > cross-references to subsections, rather than to page numbers, > suffice? Many academic books do work thus. Well, you've got a copy of the red book, what do you think? :) Can you show me such a book? I've never seen that. Maybe something on Amazon where the "look in this book" is working? -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.