Received: from mail-la0-f61.google.com ([209.85.215.61]:50504) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TaY0T-0001Es-3J; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:32:02 -0800 Received: by mail-la0-f61.google.com with SMTP id j13sf1836691lah.16 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=mpz9de0SVbakb572n8lHWjuZAt1I6N1w+vEjQg0YHso=; b=lsxK11TdiTcISghH4FpnSWA1/Tr0Ac76DtklpN8gjNGtL+QByPs+BUc66wyLqJV32i bcGfBax2n3BWHgdatBfHx9zxK4pcijjlmRqnaUpd4itCizf8yFtfVTXongjV63zK4M84 276hCf5KQEa0LZdwJcm7LRHwb26/0DBhbVrv7WMQUH/U294K6Njf1EN7MkecfOpjc3L5 6Xvzfc9wb5XrZIlokDuEiTlEzX/8uhJKIQm3psnDaCDS4vj2D4vDa5UZH4UqyZ7ZFbGZ muw4KrJbNBGsiZ784KKU3k2W6ZjJXkhGvc4nIyF0KN9AD91yBK7wO0Q/94/jqwjyKvwU f5lQ== Received: by 10.180.78.229 with SMTP id e5mr879134wix.4.1353357100919; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:40 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.100.165 with SMTP id ez5ls1550060wib.22.canary; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.153.206 with SMTP id l14mr751527bkw.5.1353357100144; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.153.206 with SMTP id l14mr751526bkw.5.1353357100130; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com (mail-bk0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1si885543bka.2.2012.11.19.12.31.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.46; Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id q16so2324862bkw.33 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.152.75 with SMTP id f11mr5265917bkw.23.1353357099968; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.73] (188-223-226-164.zone14.bethere.co.uk. [188.223.226.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm2249878bku.6.2012.11.19.12.31.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:31:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50AA9729.1090400@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:31:37 +0000 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? References: <02dd10e6-4b48-498b-9e34-9eaf37b3c3e7@googlegroups.com> <20121118131251.GG28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2ed9a908-9401-4c1d-a1f6-1f1167265d04@googlegroups.com> <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de> <50AA2215.3030502@gmx.de> <20121119185210.GM28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50AA9461.4020707@gmail.com> <20121119202652.GB3564@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20121119202652.GB3564@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Robin Lee Powell, On 19/11/2012 20:26: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:19:45PM +0000, And Rosta wrote: >> Robin Lee Powell, On 19/11/2012 18:52: >>> Oh, and that the PDF needs to be something we can send to a >>> printer to make a book out of, so (in particular) cross >>> references need to be page number based (which is why we can't >>> just print the HTML, or anything converted from it; I haven't >>> found anything that produces page number xrefs from html, much as >>> I'd *LOVE* to solve the whole thing that way). >> >> If the book's subsections are sufficiently short, wouldn't >> cross-references to subsections, rather than to page numbers, >> suffice? Many academic books do work thus. > > Well, you've got a copy of the red book, what do you think? :) > > Can you show me such a book? I've never seen that. Maybe something > on Amazon where the "look in this book" is working? I haven't time to do that. I'd just suggest that since this page number issue is an impediment to progress, you set it aside. The extra progress you could make by setting it aside outweighs any benefit of specific page refs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.