Received: from mail-lb0-f189.google.com ([209.85.217.189]:59316) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TaYl1-0001Yr-8O; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:20:07 -0800 Received: by mail-lb0-f189.google.com with SMTP id gg13sf728174lbb.16 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9ZIe3G6mS6ZY47lqMQByZLM4rmBoyBwN/ONtK39HWFU=; b=t0YU//oC/xg7hBYnJ3KKh+GHrTtZrZlTEhOIlGZvoK4WLkyaNyQKB2Zkzd1HbvcmGF wZjkLJa5dguokfEg2r6Z5h2Dh1QFPr4LlZLFQuTc0ly0HCYhcA+Vxr2bLrtUwTC/7CFX qKWZoXCf4JAGLS1Hygu22CRHoKr9SGPJVgbEDHTEL4jcROo4/e8WZm824nExtDLdbt+9 6g4lbI2i+64ujU4T6doZ5jaq75pODnXo0NDvT0o47av102l2ymNa6Z3LE/4148Dxw+zJ wxl+4oSQdxAFWPoM9qRyjOHbWrek3hTsrjGSEUdOs8+w5s5m3y5FYgp+GmcPN8vsNU+K 9TAg== Received: by 10.180.85.66 with SMTP id f2mr1114479wiz.13.1353359987403; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:47 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.108.35 with SMTP id hh3ls1667673wib.17.canary; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.153.206 with SMTP id l14mr758706bkw.5.1353359986585; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.153.206 with SMTP id l14mr758705bkw.5.1353359986570; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1si895006bka.2.2012.11.19.13.19.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of matt.mattarn@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.44; Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d3so4313295lah.31 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.46.37 with SMTP id s5mr5578690lbm.67.1353359986318; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.58.83 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:19:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20121118184842.GH28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50A9375D.5060404@gmx.de> <50AA2215.3030502@gmx.de> <20121119185210.GM28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50AA9461.4020707@gmail.com> <20121119202652.GB3564@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <50AA9729.1090400@gmail.com> <20121119203957.GC3564@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121119204323.GH27366@sunflowerriver.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:19:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Please answer a book design opinion question (was Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?) From: Matt Arnold To: lojban X-Original-Sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of matt.mattarn@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=matt.mattarn@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / My preferences are in the following order, from best to worst: 1. A page index. 2. An index that refers to section and paragraph numbers, if every page has a section number, and every paragraph in the book is numbered. I have used reference materials which worked that way, and they were successful. Such an index does not change if typsetting or layout were to re-flow text to different pages. 3. No index. 4. No CLL 2.0. Auto-indexing a book from a source file in XML is a feature of Adobe InDesign. I would love to use that to produce CLL 2.0, but have met resistance to it in the past. -Eppcott On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > +1 > > Though, it's a lot easier for me to say "Yes, amazing index is essential" > when I'm not the one doing the work. > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:43 PM, .alyn.post. > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:39:57PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:31:37PM +0000, And Rosta wrote: >> > > Robin Lee Powell, On 19/11/2012 20:26: >> > > >On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 08:19:45PM +0000, And Rosta wrote: >> > > >>Robin Lee Powell, On 19/11/2012 18:52: >> > > >>>Oh, and that the PDF needs to be something we can send to a >> > > >>>printer to make a book out of, so (in particular) cross >> > > >>>references need to be page number based (which is why we can't >> > > >>>just print the HTML, or anything converted from it; I haven't >> > > >>>found anything that produces page number xrefs from html, much >> > > >>>as I'd *LOVE* to solve the whole thing that way). >> > > >> >> > > >>If the book's subsections are sufficiently short, wouldn't >> > > >>cross-references to subsections, rather than to page numbers, >> > > >>suffice? Many academic books do work thus. >> > > > >> > > >Well, you've got a copy of the red book, what do you think? :) >> > > > >> > > >Can you show me such a book? I've never seen that. Maybe >> > > >something on Amazon where the "look in this book" is working? >> > > >> > > I haven't time to do that. I'd just suggest that since this page >> > > number issue is an impediment to progress, you set it aside. The >> > > extra progress you could make by setting it aside outweighs any >> > > benefit of specific page refs. >> > >> > OK. Can other people weigh in here? If you were reading a >> > technical book that had no page number based index, wouldn't that >> > shock you? Wouldn't you be all like "what a pack of losers"? I >> > think I would. >> > >> > I've been assuming that that's just totally unacceptable, but I'm >> > willing to be persuaded otherwise. >> > >> >> I feel roughly aligned with you. If we publish a book describing a >> logical language and we can't be bothered to properly >> cross-reference it I'd wonder about us more than I already do. >> >> Honestly, A good index is worth doing by hand, if that's what it >> takes. >> >> mi'e .alyn. >> -- >> .i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.