Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:50639)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCW7JPVOKYIINR5KQUCRUBAKEMOGK@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TaYpR-0001ax-8g; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:24:41 -0800
Received: by mail-gh0-f189.google.com with SMTP id f15sf4070553ghb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=IUeiEXNQOTVc6wf3RPjJDujgTM8y//LDZ9BwqNndrZ0=;
        b=dnggieGkZ/gzHtJyRMUOMwWZVwg4W8zYa5O5ayzNulZ2qAz5YJr4z7hO90w5P81k9B
         jmz+rJA+Ltf3JKMcVVLQdymSuwjhf1Rmkt2kCMwb+NEVdW0h0vxImjVjAQ6Ak4ezB65m
         Iv2cKfmbIhbMQlg4U5AHoW/UeL5Twm157tklT+hO+GNHUYNYksjTimaMKlMcZcnVKHFr
         1NoNU2pq44R/pg79F/czjR2yC47rpQm7+Kpiu3f0zU5lBTrpEUsUxQ0QpLv/poJVzJJy
         51D7Funb9C5/kgxVkOVTXpADVEUQ7uG3w3m+Ut+vXPTpKUeeA7gTxpVMQ0K5SVM6rGir
         9HJQ==
Received: by 10.50.169.103 with SMTP id ad7mr3073949igc.2.1353360262857;
        Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:24:22 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.152.205 with SMTP id va13ls3068187igb.31.canary; Mon, 19
 Nov 2012 13:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.84.98 with SMTP id x2mr120521pay.15.1353360262020;
        Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.84.98 with SMTP id x2mr120520pay.15.1353360262009;
        Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r4si1731464paz.1.2012.11.19.13.24.21
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:24:21 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1TaYpD-0001as-ED
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:24:15 -0800
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:24:15 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Please answer a book design opinion question (was Re: [lojban]
 CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?)
Message-ID: <20121119212415.GD3564@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <CAMKwHj00ZfuP_S5fsWC2RacXTbzJa4X3=vkxKF2E_r23p8Jryw@mail.gmail.com>
 <50AA2215.3030502@gmx.de>
 <d509d495-e481-46e4-9557-3aca44b47d93@googlegroups.com>
 <20121119185210.GM28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <50AA9461.4020707@gmail.com>
 <20121119202652.GB3564@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <50AA9729.1090400@gmail.com>
 <20121119203957.GC3564@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <20121119204323.GH27366@sunflowerriver.org>
 <CAEimHHBr+rr7=VQ-7r_GgwqQztZ13KFOzGrDm60+=fOYVrsOCw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEimHHBr+rr7=VQ-7r_GgwqQztZ13KFOzGrDm60+=fOYVrsOCw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

There seems to have been some confusion on the question.

To be clear, we will have an amazing index either way.

The question is, how important is the difference between:

lo              10, 17, 28, 342
klama           22, 781
abstractions    85, 141, 542

and

lo              Section 1.1 Introduction, Section 2.3 Articles, Section 3.4 Bob, Section 7.8 Frobnitz
klama           Section 1.1 Introduction, Section 18.12 Too Many Sections
abstractions    Section 2.3 Articles, Section 5.7 Qux, Section 12.18 Backwards

Ignore the details of formatting in the latter case; pretend I can
have it say anything *except* the page number.

Assuming both indexes had the same content, which do you prefer for
a *PRINTED* book, and how much?

How much difference does it make if the average length of a section
is, say, 3 pages?

-Robin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.