Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:40268)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBD7MJ4NJRIDRBOH5WOCQKGQEA4KOFFI@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TbD05-0007bo-2a; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:18:22 -0800
Received: by mail-qc0-f189.google.com with SMTP id c11sf5339432qca.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:18:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version
         :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id
         :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=0HhXQWQP2P/gm3g9w3JtwdxWmfjzZ3s5eBzzX/crum8=;
        b=RVhE1HKJzcqWWwHWpgQnDscmv+3gWd3K7KW3MlpoTCAWLG4PKMPTIN5k19mbdUjTHu
         B1gGk6/+Vi1oMGb1mrhD7cuoWq+BvSlLCxUhD29pGIlm3DQ49Y18UWj5OZ9NyP/Blzbp
         t0gsxYaOBPAD4pM+xjGyAn2sGqHOqLWdv2qERS+h/sl344d+lPUBK8hKdRkDphh2wrQw
         mI8XyKobeW3icmz19aGnGKkuj8aNlZ/6lgpUKPGYjUKASyyXNdyzZVNthUECTObucQhf
         nOiVg/IHw+Snn1stvqNxZu+/GRG42TDsC7tCNQDuYgwboi8v1guQ/kdXTfdGigy5u8eQ
         vzkg==
Received: by 10.49.76.65 with SMTP id i1mr4229104qew.24.1353514681931;
        Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:18:01 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.26.73 with SMTP id j9ls3595785qeg.41.gmail; Wed, 21 Nov
 2012 08:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.189.16 with SMTP id dc16mr13311189qab.0.1353514680488;
        Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.16.202 with SMTP id p10msqaa;
        Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.127.113 with SMTP id nf17mr3813661qeb.29.1353455025342;
        Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:43:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "charlicopter@gmail.com" <lanternsmith@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <291e8942-2309-4343-b7ff-a56ac60c320a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Novel written system that parallels the logic of Lojban?
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: lanternsmith@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_696_10270172.1353455024884"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_696_10270172.1353455024884
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Greetings everyone, 
This is my first time visiting the forums...
My curiosity currently lies in the possibility of a written system that 
could be developed around Lojban that respects its logical nature. 
As far as I can tell in my rudimentary beginnings as a student of Lojban: 
The language is designed around phonetics in a similar way to Japanese. by 
that, I mean that the language uses predictable and consistent combinations 
of vowel and consonant phonetics in the structure of the constituent 
word-forms.

Preposition: In written Lojban, what if you used a character system similar 
to Japanese hiragana and katakana: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katakana  
&  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiragana 
Japanese Katakana and Hiragana are based on characters which hail from 
ancient cultural influences, but what if you started fresh and designed 
characters around some kind of logical analysis of Lojbanic structure, 
syntax, logic, etc. such that the characters are themselves always 
internally consistent and logical? Pictorally speaking, you have many 
variables to draw upon: stroke length, angle, curvature, dots, 
rotation/orientation, etc. certainly as many variables as are needed to 
accurately represent the phonetics, syntax etc. of the language. In this 
way, entire gismu might have a chance of being reduced to single characters 
which LOOK and FLOW as logically as they behave.

Thoughts? 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/RSMpezF6avUJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_696_10270172.1353455024884
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings everyone, <br>This is my first time visiting the forums...<br>My =
curiosity currently lies in the possibility of a written system that could =
be developed around Lojban that respects its logical nature. <br>As far as =
I can tell in my rudimentary beginnings as a student of Lojban: The languag=
e is designed around phonetics in a similar way to Japanese. by that, I mea=
n that the language uses predictable and consistent combinations of vowel a=
nd consonant phonetics in the structure of the constituent word-forms.<br><=
br>Preposition: In written Lojban, what if you used a character system simi=
lar to Japanese hiragana and katakana: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katakan=
a&nbsp; &amp;&nbsp; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiragana <br>Japanese Kata=
kana and Hiragana are based on characters which hail from ancient cultural =
influences, but what if you started fresh and designed characters around so=
me kind of logical analysis of Lojbanic structure, syntax, logic, etc. such=
 that the characters are themselves always internally consistent and logica=
l? Pictorally speaking, you have many variables to draw upon: stroke length=
, angle, curvature, dots, rotation/orientation, etc. certainly as many vari=
ables as are needed to accurately represent the phonetics, syntax etc. of t=
he language. In this way, entire gismu might have a chance of being reduced=
 to single characters which LOOK and FLOW as logically as they behave.<br><=
br>Thoughts? <br><br> <br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/RSMpezF6avUJ">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/RS=
MpezF6avUJ</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_696_10270172.1353455024884--