Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of celestialcognition@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.179;
Message-ID: <50B216C7.10107@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 07:01:59 -0600
From: vitci'i <celestialcognition@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: [lojban] A lojbanic rhyme schema
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Different cultures have had different rules for what sort
   of repetition is considered poetic: rhyme, assonance, consonance, etc. I wanted
    something unique and inherently lojbanic. Here's my proposal. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
                             was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [209.85.216.189 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (celestialcognition[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

Different cultures have had different rules for what sort of repetition
is considered poetic: rhyme, assonance, consonance, etc. I wanted
something unique and inherently lojbanic. Here's my proposal.


Two words {jborimni} iff they share at least one rafsi-candidate.[1] For
example, "bangu" and "bakni" jborimni because they share the
rafsi-candidate "-ban-".

For purposes of this definition, the rafsi-candidates of a cmavo are
considered to be its actual rafsi (if any) and itself.

Lujvo are read as their veljvo (e.g., "brivla" is treated as equivalent
to "bridi valsi"). Fu'ivla/zi'evla never jborimni with anything.
(Self-jborimni is considered a degenerate case, to be avoided.)

Cmene should be quasi-parsed: ".lojban." rhymes as "logji bangu" (e.g.
with "bargu"); ".alis." rhymes as ".a lis." (e.g. with "lisri").


Note that (lo se gismu be fa zo jborimni) is not necessarily transitive.


This definition can be used in a variety of verse structures. Perhaps
you might want ends of lines to jborimni, or beginnings, or the
beginning of each line with its end, or to use jborimni placed
irregularly throughout the middles of lines.


[1] See http://dag.github.com/cll/4/6/ for the rules on deriving rafsi
candidates from gismu.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.