Received: from mail-yh0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:60371) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TejTi-0001X7-Gh; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:35:31 -0800 Received: by mail-yh0-f61.google.com with SMTP id o21sf333952yho.16 for ; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:35:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=jgvID1gxsCtK+Jqv5+bJdEWILg/J18tXTxrggnYgfFo=; b=MdlY2N7/tSQNzuFK1WY6mzGbcRykMPIYLi5qgzbSZ5X/OPPaULP6TbLW43ox2L/IIb jATP82m02SYc9vSZS8xWxVEnP54ZE3s7jVx/cpFtVN4oiuC+kVMCm4sS7jf30R3zVlPE HQAspeKFrClqJ0z8m1cOYkw3eYCk9Z7dpuYdooQo3NrUaBR4WGmKOi/jZW1wcsQjZ0qm NsoWpef3d6Px4qF2LckJGKCPRXhAGN297HHOVxFOOVdbixu159HWoH1YjQoTdxtiba27 INVkKupkDE3w16Q5R+UGRJ4CvOKRmQeZ4W8BWm1Ak0noUnq8Wb4UeqaKykQYrgMbu+Eh MbSg== Received: by 10.49.28.131 with SMTP id b3mr1034518qeh.42.1354354500598; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:35:00 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.48.48 with SMTP id i16ls712512qen.89.gmail; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:34:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.58.167 with SMTP id s7mr1058044qeq.5.1354354499279; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:34:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 01:34:58 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <016d8978-9681-4d55-af4b-543a79abe45f@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <98ac3a8c-7f91-4049-a8ee-128f9a947671@googlegroups.com> <60b24557-d28a-4330-91e2-4fa350f35cbd@googlegroups.com> <6cb197db-5690-48fb-8a88-3e633bb6f94b@googlegroups.com> <285a3908-97fd-4231-8767-479dd0779da8@googlegroups.com> <20121113171712.GG22972@sunflowerriver.org> <699d8b9d-2f04-4a0a-b2cf-a9f498ac19fd@googlegroups.com> <20121113194725.GL22972@sunflowerriver.org> <7c389416-3ceb-4d21-9b6b-e4e1cb5d312f@googlegroups.com> <2d4db499-3585-4456-b7c7-6a6846d6bcee@googlegroups.com> <8f8fac5c-9085-48eb-8793-d0e536e45f85@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: A new Lojbanic wiki (LMW). On the threshold of the 25th anniversary of Lojban MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_455_3006667.1354354498856" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_455_3006667.1354354498856 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday, December 1, 2012 1:18:15 PM UTC+4, iesk wrote: > > Le samedi 1 d=E9cembre 2012 01:03:26 UTC+1, entot a =E9crit : >> >> It's not a question of if the default language is English or not. It's a= =20 >> question of whether we present a Lojban-only page to a newcomer. I think= =20 >> showing a Lojbanic interface and Lojban-only content to a newcomer is no= t=20 >> friendly. >> > (I guess its 'friendlier' than piping interested people through English= =20 > when it isn't necessary.) > =20 > >> >> If the primary language is Lojban, are you, doi la gleki. .e la .iesk.,= =20 >> fine with importing all the pages from TWiki to LMW? Lots of them are in= =20 >> English. >> > > Since I have so far not contributed anything useful to LMW, my opinion=20 > does not weigh much. > > I repeat that my idea of the wiki was that there be no 'primary language'= =20 > for content pages. Everybody would write pages in the language(s) of thei= r=20 > preference. I don't think it likely that there will be systematic=20 > translations of all LMW pages in all LMW languages (whichever that may be= ).=20 > Most content will probably be in English anyway (TWiki imports included),= =20 > who would translate all that stuff? So why not have a page in, say, Frenc= h,=20 > link to relevant pages in, say, English, Lojban, =85 I have been arguing= =20 > *against* any primary language, because that would, to my understanding,= =20 > mean that you have to write (or wait for somebody to write) a page about= =20 > 'broda' in the primary language before you can add a page about 'broda' i= n=20 > the language that you want. > Unfortunately I have no idea of a mechanism of creating a wiki without any= =20 primary language. And LMW is after all a linguistic project. The core of=20 Lojbanistan is Lojban which is a language. Anyway LMW-contributors must=20 know at least some basic lojban. This will be enough to create new pages in= =20 simple lojban first and then creating it's "translation" in another=20 language e.g. English. *UPDATE:* I already noticed first attempts of spamming in LMW from anonymous users.= =20 Threrefore ConfirmEdit extension installed to prevent spamming. ReCaptcha mode=20 activated for new users. It makes us dependent on third-party ReCaptcha=20 service, but it's the simplest solution. > =20 > >> >> ni'o >> >> I'm holding off any work I said or hinted I'd be doing (working on the= =20 >> community portal and migrating) until I get a clear picture of what the= =20 >> site organization is going to be [1]: >> >> * Who is the target audience? >> * What content will it have, in what language? >> >> As far as I understand, there are two interests at hand: >> >> * Target audience: Lojban speakers >> * Content: Anything in Lojban? / Translation projects, Lojbanic writings= ,=20 >> Lojbanists index >> >> * Target audience: Lojban learners >> * Content: Learning materials in English and other languages around the= =20 >> world >> > > I na=EFvely thought of a home for all things Lojbanic. ;) > =20 > >> >> If this is the case, I think it's not out of the question to maintain tw= o=20 >> separate wikis for each: lojban.org and ckule.lojban.org. In MediaWiki,= =20 >> there is a way to share the extensions folder and such to lessen the=20 >> admininstrative task. If there are corresponding pages between the two,= =20 >> they can be linked to each other in the way Wikipedia links pages in oth= er=20 >> languages. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> [1] This is partly an excuse to focus my time on helping CLL1.1; I'm not= =20 >> a good multitasker. >> >> mu'o >> > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/pRGILiIkIBgJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_455_3006667.1354354498856 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Saturday, December 1, 2012 1:18:15 PM UTC+4, iesk wrote:Le samedi 1 d=E9cembre 2012 01:03:26 U= TC+1, entot a =E9crit :
It= 's not a question of if the default language is English or not. It's a ques= tion of whether we present a Lojban-only page to a newcomer. I think showin= g a Lojbanic interface and Lojban-only content to a newcomer is not friendl= y.
(I guess its 'friendlier' than piping interested = people through English when it isn't necessary.)
 

If the primary language is= Lojban, are you, doi la gleki. .e la .iesk., fine with importing all the p= ages from TWiki to LMW? Lots of them are in English.

Since I have so far not contributed anything useful to LMW, my opinion= does not weigh much.

I repeat that my idea of the wiki was that the= re be no 'primary language' for content pages. Everybody would write pages = in the language(s) of their preference. I don't think it likely that there = will be systematic translations of all LMW pages in all LMW languages (whic= hever that may be). Most content will probably be in English anyway (TWiki = imports included), who would translate all that stuff? So why not have a pa= ge in, say, French, link to relevant pages in, say, English, Lojban, =85&nb= sp; I have been arguing *against* any primary language, because that would,= to my understanding, mean that you have to write (or wait for somebody to = write) a page about 'broda' in the primary language before you can add a pa= ge about 'broda' in the language that you want.
=
Unfortunately I have no idea of a mechanism of creating a wi= ki without any primary language. And LMW is after all a linguistic project.= The core of Lojbanistan is Lojban which is a language. Anyway LMW-contribu= tors must know at least some basic lojban. This will be enough to create ne= w pages in simple lojban first and then creating it's "translation" in anot= her language e.g. English.

UPDATE:
I already noticed first attempts of spamming in LMW from anonymous users.= Threrefore
ConfirmEdit extension installed to prevent spamming. ReCaptc= ha mode activated for new users. It makes us dependent on third-party ReCap= tcha service, but it's the simplest solution.


=

&nbs= p;

ni'o

I'm holding off any work I said or hinted I'd be doi= ng (working on the community portal and migrating) until I get a clear pict= ure of what the site organization is going to be [1]:

<= div>* Who is the target audience?
* What content will it have, in= what language?

As far as I understand, there are = two interests at hand:

* Target audience: Lojban s= peakers
* Content: Anything in Lojban? / Translation projects, Lo= jbanic writings, Lojbanists index

* Target audienc= e: Lojban learners
* Content: Learning materials in English and o= ther languages around the world

I na=EFvely thou= ght of a home for all things Lojbanic. ;)
 

If this is the case, I think it'= s not out of the question to maintain two separate wikis for each: lojban.org and ckule.lojban.org. In MediaWiki, = there is a way to share the extensions folder and such to lessen the admini= nstrative task. If there are corresponding pages between the two, they can = be linked to each other in the way Wikipedia links pages in other languages= .

Any thoughts?

[1] This = is partly an excuse to focus my time on helping CLL1.1; I'm not a good mult= itasker.

mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/pR= GILiIkIBgJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_455_3006667.1354354498856--