Received: from mail-wi0-f188.google.com ([209.85.212.188]:45902) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl07Q-0005qX-WD; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:34:18 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f188.google.com with SMTP id hn3sf284339wib.25 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:34:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=7aO1f6f7ID7zw+HaMbn7sD+9ECqgh2uvQKEt7koXw8s=; b=WufRrKDN9mOJbD8fm5zNMLf/mldfNCwftSu7QzuMPeiNOiLfv5bbLrQcrF7EYivk0M Vdu7BSHrTA3Qw1+VANO2x3GafV0YenTMB2Y1Z55Tfds6gTeUt2QWVrLERWK/dwhOini0 KvdeU5n7Gmy34anWNO7VgTNAsbkfU6T9ZFG8sWg4WPULtQ8BC3XRRqoHhN1Dk1UvN3+R hoFEPUXaz9cjnMq3963ucOzwaUCKjxN7An55tTG7vT9Z9Nm+83V+ndOoyIFrEy57hjxj ILcsnP6hbJab/1uI+hFP+OYgctl8XS3G3dh/NDEbZmnxfKgg9aMIQvvQJf8PuQX1RfnW TzGw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=7aO1f6f7ID7zw+HaMbn7sD+9ECqgh2uvQKEt7koXw8s=; b=YUe18QydmsEwrPJHeAOruk/Rgk37wOmxiHhUm7QDRRQahDhW3pevSCkrQ30jawSQ52 V5TtqJiSFP59f6ft13hozbw2VV1TE9JpjdXEjq+OLUpAS6cf+v2JASWdL/ZJ0LHyTqlQ CNohIuvLik8xxe51GL/7bCTJBo6CZsrmlHNFMhleAFi5CW74IRGwwL/3TkmoExQn/YSh etCizBPnnlXoW8lwa5Oyy5TP9yNN+wtuD0mo425WWcrE56tusCxPHjfXpvDz7oZGIZy8 kNwuuWLtOH/IQ4ovH92KESnxNkMAbSonkojT+C2JAl2XKheB07Kj6XOX+mUu36LaU4Ar 9onA== X-Received: by 10.180.99.231 with SMTP id et7mr562244wib.8.1355848443690; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:34:03 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.73.114 with SMTP id k18ls1622556wiv.15.canary; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:33:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.11.65 with SMTP id s1mr202404bks.7.1355848437042; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:33:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.11.65 with SMTP id s1mr202403bks.7.1355848437028; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v18si166497bkw.1.2012.12.18.08.33.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of betsemes@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.45; Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p9so734301laa.32 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:33:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.17.129 with SMTP id o1mr1110062lbd.54.1355848436079; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:33:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.123.134 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:33:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:33:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] cmene From: Betsemes To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: betsemes@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of betsemes@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=betsemes@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / I need your feedback. I have been thinking on naming conventions for a fictional story; more specifically on what would be family names. On my fictional story, boys take the name of their fathers as family name and girls take the name of their mothers. The name is built by putting them together by using {pe} thus: {la zmabaz nitoris pe la nolzu'e zei ioxnaris}. In this example the character name is {la zmabaz nitoris} while eir family name is {la nolzu'e zei ioxnaris}. But I have been thinking that this might not be actually a full name, but two names bound together by {pe}. Is that how is it interpreted? Would this naming conventions be a possibility in the real world? ki'e mu'o mi'e betsemes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.