Received: from mail-wg0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:61373)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCEOJRHPZYFBB3VPY6DAKGQEWTY4LSY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TlLE7-0004yt-To; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:06:48 -0800
Received: by mail-wg0-f61.google.com with SMTP id gg4sf671015wgb.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:06:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:x-received
         :received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=zP9/QhMFc2MNL8yUOL4hRjs0WX+vRIGx1MP4UA51qKs=;
        b=i53Vs4UIg64Te4DgANM7I9HgYT0/rXfICNXFmvcHeAOqD7y2cUzetWlajcz+aYMBC7
         k3xaKKd7xqc4j1cESMv652YPrQQjs6P6FGkwfLmSx8/LYKTI8ITNY4SgCz7SeMFl1bvK
         sRi3xfqBgQuYKnxYtEPHuzh07g7K/mCM7Ez90BzHI2fMCLQOAgMHCME4jD1Qx+kt2k/n
         74PVpswPHjJ8yLFifTKmlFAoaJxSWqIxmmNV+N51UcHl1z9s/XHkIuXSC8z0WFg8N0SS
         +nckGiOohZc8JmC23s/IDNUWxx5LI2GXYyGX2qY2noAE0sXJAH8JHliBoTuUce6KPNLL
         x0PQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:x-received
         :received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=zP9/QhMFc2MNL8yUOL4hRjs0WX+vRIGx1MP4UA51qKs=;
        b=gCp0rWRpG8R2aJUPI+bCUBFSO8/auIjL0r4MRhnbCmxuzLa5xhhKtOv/riT4p9WHwG
         bCidn1axpMP9w+yyDkf+DHeKa7iVZyveLnguKPL1hpAcehCEaIls0mvwdhKzZsWETu3U
         eAoaeIC0f3c2e/4uUs0Q0mFELi2crHkRfwgpLuC97d8rPbpR7IdFB/qrWNekLLFG035F
         Bu2DobwzjtdEcaEswHaYhP6oBM5tqz9yzDuENXziH6VnDQ1jn6Psos9T8m1vYnp+ZdE/
         9awuUeluQHBXC+LZuO5LLzTyC2BNV/zuGQGjTntUWeOr++L5ImPJ2T61oRDGpgyGQQMN
         5l2A==
X-Received: by 10.180.106.230 with SMTP id gx6mr226574wib.16.1355929583360;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:06:23 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.24.196 with SMTP id w4ls2116112wif.12.canary; Wed, 19 Dec
 2012 07:06:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.180.109.162 with SMTP id ht2mr2143747wib.1.1355929582277;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.139.115 with SMTP id qx19mswjb;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:00:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.204.130.141 with SMTP id t13mr304502bks.3.1355914806239;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:00:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.204.130.141 with SMTP id t13mr304501bks.3.1355914806221;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7si342449bkr.3.2012.12.19.03.00.06
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of betsemes@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.44;
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d3so1476946lah.17
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:00:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.104.226 with SMTP id gh2mr4955635lab.24.1355914806028;
 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.123.134 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 03:00:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1662562.7D6PzfkIbm@caracal>
References: <CAHxnAm+QpE5hUOHLfeSudwN1-j8sTV=DrVbCrmt3VKFWs-ExuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1662562.7D6PzfkIbm@caracal>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:00:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHxnAmK25sgK9Ejhd+3Fn0biOt8tdLcNGjMyC+TcNkK_jm9_dw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] cmene
From: Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: betsemes@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of betsemes@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=betsemes@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote=
:
> You can fix this by putting the {pe} in front: {la pe la nolzu'e zei
> ioxnaris [ku] zmabaz nitoris}. Otherwise (since the name is a cmevla) you
> encounter the issue you mentioned.

Thank you. I'll have to sleep on this since I find putting a "la pe
la" into a name a bit ugly.

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 12:33:56 Betsemes wrote:
> I'd just put the names together (which doesn't work when one name is a
> brivla).

That's why I placed a {zei} between "nolzu'e" and "ioxnaris"; it's not
the same thing, but it works. I've always found this limitation
annoying; I even considered using a lojban dialect in my story in
which a cmene could be built by putting cmevla and brivla together,
but I decided against that. I don't know why the founders decided to
impose that limitation; I just have found {cu} a little more elidable
with that limitation which is not worth it in my opinion. Maybe I'm
overlooking a bigger benefit.

> Some time ago I proposed a similar system, except that everyone has
> two family names, and wrote out my family tree. My full name in that syst=
em is
> ".pier.anr=EDs.mic=E9l.blojben.ab=E1t.", where "blojben" is the name I in=
herit from
> my grandmother.

I remember that, and I'm basing this system on that one. It's just
that my "family names" are not really family names, but the names of
the parents (father or mother). In my story, during growth, people
reach an age when they pass through a "coming of age" ritual where
they have to decide whether they wish to keep their family names or
switch. This way there could be men bearing the name of their mothers,
and women bearing the name of their fathers. Most people choose to
keep it.

ki'e mu'o mi'e betsemes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.