Received: from mail-ob0-f188.google.com ([209.85.214.188]:44926)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDKM7JENRINRB7XIY6DAKGQEI27VODI@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TlN82-0005sY-EU; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:08:32 -0800
Received: by mail-ob0-f188.google.com with SMTP id wc20sf1255951obb.25
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:08:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:from:to
         :subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=tILySolXL5pAHw5jzdS8xDU75UNCGk7kMRDv7I08ETU=;
        b=S0o0loBFHEfHn2CUuW/TqnfxDgqotYE4bOXH6uVVINh1NVVryWUGUWKWN+oE8ClgEK
         jRMYtJRqHmKxqh8+Tsw3AbAOjWtfA3nqPrrbcjMZBIpELZC13xjXrRoFB7zXYdVaPs2Q
         eSLfy/dhzNYv55NyrzBxtCIUCarRJoRMhxRkqS2xYhrZH9L/3rhNanhqEQ7XbNMvNw40
         Ppab9PLugs3Ekl4bdQ6Rd3Mie6RR+46wTs46bcVRGSZ0xUmoUhWO1DucRF39zYG/WT4E
         ZHBLCgM06DZB7ID6XVeAuD1ZhXIpD03Liy62Sk6+eAKlIqSagYsTFKAF6nMYG+Eh4hxn
         GEHQ==
X-Received: by 10.49.116.115 with SMTP id jv19mr1011687qeb.21.1355936895749;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:08:15 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.62.233 with SMTP id b9ls970025qes.13.gmail; Wed, 19 Dec
 2012 09:08:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.42.39 with SMTP id i27mr2464851yhb.50.1355936894371;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:08:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.42.39 with SMTP id i27mr2464850yhb.50.1355936894359;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:08:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id i63si495923yhk.5.2012.12.19.09.08.14;
        Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:08:14 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5;
Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39397217DE
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:08:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Use of gismu components in lujvo
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:08:13 -0500
Message-ID: <4953697.e4AGG6xipn@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-34-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <6a7fd079-93fd-46ee-8c8b-ddb489d40ad4@googlegroups.com>
References: <6a7fd079-93fd-46ee-8c8b-ddb489d40ad4@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best
 guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 06:26:48 Adam Chevalier wrote:
> I've noticed that some of the possible combinations of gismu components
> when forming a lujvo confuse vlasisku.
> Does this mean these combinations are invalid? Or does vlasisku simply have
> a hard time seeing some of the combos?
> 
> e.g.
> 
> rokci - rok, ro'i
> cevni - cev, cei
> 
> vlasisku can see the components in cevro'i and rokcei, but no other
> combinations.

A lujvo beginning "ro'i" or "cei" has to have an interfix "r" or "n" right 
after that, else the "ro'i" or "cei" falls off: ro'inro'i, ceircei. "cevcei" is 
invalid because of the cluster; it needs to be "cevycei". "rokro'i" is valid.

Pierre
-- 
gau do li'i co'e kei do

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.