Received: from mail-ob0-f183.google.com ([209.85.214.183]:51729)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCV4BWUFTAARBIVC4KDAKGQEMFVIWSI@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TnBr0-0004WW-0g; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:30:27 -0800
Received: by mail-ob0-f183.google.com with SMTP id x4sf3882947obh.0
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:30:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=1igg/7B1XLANqcU20aUUdx9I+1uZyhy9oIeBU2XE8Cs=;
        b=Kilko1xaeAlB42+otbb2A2eJaz6uCoaN0/hchyZng/uu1RMCVLWmsjw5S+WjtIr02W
         je+NcHyFordjy0Oq2lZ5flZ0EElhwzoX0kJ9OLQaSVLY1gWdrdTsz9fShjcmYRdeNrvm
         +ML4kBMTMGTNemwmFH6Ff5TZwJxz2kwLozFc4dsolI+Qln1BeSGNXLoRo9JoATfoEPGf
         O4M8VIcmagHOaKO2jHEP8byCaGBc+iBaakSzTGnVaSsY/IcP0jAdq050CdD/RmMzJv6K
         JSBRaGj2NMVqZo2zmNHjnwuyIskoBAW/TXjHt6eqgydB6DfPOcDKJJeG+hoXUvD2iDbn
         +gQA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=1igg/7B1XLANqcU20aUUdx9I+1uZyhy9oIeBU2XE8Cs=;
        b=jtG5tGNJY4uOCLwAUy2o3Mxk42QoiKL3KIaMUlLh9ZEXiVvTspgQjRY0hs6DBi8q7q
         M4+KS4WvKY2HcVcrkPylyxMyatBQmHtF/ua22Inick7xDYhQm3iILjQOuCdZAw1dN+34
         i2Fg9wrwcLOlPKxBlzapfYDhcQJkpzU0EbAaNVFPqDYqz7HCkE3pFky1qjX7GUsbo2/p
         H5ZHu1UO1zGiW9LG4CDUS8Q/PoP6dTtXvK34sRxo0pnGy6n0VU8G4rcpyxvWOAV0/ouz
         MHQbG33NcjmwhH3EZoV5fWqXU4nEaJO9/lSCoC2Ie9qLGkVnYkVghy1qT5/S2SSh+y+s
         cRQA==
X-Received: by 10.182.232.66 with SMTP id tm2mr364906obc.14.1356370211597;
        Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:30:11 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.182.103.69 with SMTP id fu5ls616039obb.74.gmail; Mon, 24 Dec
 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.59.0.234 with SMTP id bb10mr10197520ved.32.1356370210489;
        Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.59.0.234 with SMTP id bb10mr10197519ved.32.1356370210474;
        Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com (mail-vb0-f46.google.com [209.85.212.46])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20si6467055vdg.3.2012.12.24.09.30.10
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.46;
Received: by mail-vb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b13so7516593vby.5
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.155.212 with SMTP id t20mr33965851vcw.55.1356370210368;
 Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:30:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.65.233 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:29:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj0Xaxh7VW4cznescHixkGO80qVXCmkSLAvGwnsKYU9-zA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <11ecfede-d731-44b8-b71e-8aa427be0544@googlegroups.com>
 <CAOQ8VDWynAZR90BKiSMC+9jrADOKG6zndh+X+t5oSb8RFbxUoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMKwHj0Xaxh7VW4cznescHixkGO80qVXCmkSLAvGwnsKYU9-zA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:29:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOQ8VDW_1H7JwpOvfyqLwAte5QR02Hxkue9bNiFVtVbRR=TScA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Comments inside quotations. {lu ... [sei ...se'u] ...
 li'u}. No solution?
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438949f92ad6004d19c8c31
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--f46d0438949f92ad6004d19c8c31
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 24 December 2012 12:18, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> ..I propose something far more vague, like {ju'e}....
>>
>
> Your proposal is what it currently is. :)
>
>
>
Haha, although to be honest, practically no one (talking about IRC usage
here) uses double FA, so I wouldn't quite call it "what it currently is".
Also, I didn't think that any official decisions had been made with regards
to double FA. If you can provide a link to a record of the decision, that'd
be really great.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--f46d0438949f92ad6004d19c8c31
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 24 December 2012 12:18, Jonathan Jones <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"=
mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">eyeonus@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span=
> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st=
yle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Jacob Erringto=
n <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:nictytan@gmail.com" target=3D"_bl=
ank">nictytan@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:=
1ex">


..I propose something far more vague, like {ju&#39;e}....<br></blockquote><=
/div><br clear=3D"all">Your proposal is what it currently is. :)<div class=
=3D"im HOEnZb"><br></div><div class=3D"im HOEnZb"><br></div></blockquote><d=
iv>

<br></div><div>Haha, although to be honest, practically no one (talking abo=
ut IRC usage here) uses double FA, so I wouldn&#39;t quite call it &quot;wh=
at it currently is&quot;. Also, I didn&#39;t think that any official decisi=
ons had been made with regards to double FA. If you can provide a link to a=
 record of the decision, that&#39;d be really great.</div>

<div><br></div><div>.i mi&#39;e la tsani mu&#39;o</div></div><br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--f46d0438949f92ad6004d19c8c31--