Received: from mail-fa0-f59.google.com ([209.85.161.59]:51479)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDUNF3UDXIJBBHGQ4ODAKGQEJUXJQPA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TnHe9-0006TW-8v; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:41:47 -0800
Received: by mail-fa0-f59.google.com with SMTP id v1sf2772610fav.4
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:41:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from
         :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type
         :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=pyX52FTp1m8qVUrKfmpBSR+GELvYvy5AM1aCLzyV5kI=;
        b=m0/OWf3aurl1AzSNcuwwWJRuYbv7lpnW7kP4InoujWojqA8mJY1V12rLk+M7xHa/sO
         KTD88wIUEnu5HJSZD5jdlV8gp0MxaFUJqypi3E51TTpfvp2ZiiODAJZQNiw4lFR2EiNN
         RtwpAsYt6mFU5RBSqaWURiVfhJikPNUZLUSfp6yic/fQbL7+r29uKD/yRTS3nRnB11pI
         ADkH96S9EqrtWDzLHhFF9FVlvrd50HWoA+Vmdo2O+izEMtfX1DO4GB7TYd03TlCBWMiH
         0eC+dmr212FS3TRmppyvvQRV/kC0VIrXo+rEzHeEE1smP+l0dUTGzArsAJ6n6TBFAEAx
         0s4A==
X-Received: by 10.180.24.196 with SMTP id w4mr3596117wif.3.1356392477439;
        Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:41:17 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.100.133 with SMTP id ey5ls2722344wib.32.gmail; Mon, 24 Dec
 2012 15:41:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.14.0.196 with SMTP id 44mr29518158eeb.6.1356392476666;
        Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:41:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.14.0.196 with SMTP id 44mr29518156eeb.6.1356392476653;
        Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:41:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9si7861068eeo.1.2012.12.24.15.41.16
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:41:16 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119;
Received: from samsa (brln-4dbc0cfd.pool.mediaWays.net [77.188.12.253])
	by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0FB788650A6
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:41:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:41:15 +0100
From: v4hn <me@v4hn.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Comments inside quotations. {lu ... [sei ...se'u] ...
 li'u}. No solution?
Message-ID: <20121224234115.GA7855@samsa.fritz.box>
References: <11ecfede-d731-44b8-b71e-8aa427be0544@googlegroups.com>
 <CAOQ8VDWynAZR90BKiSMC+9jrADOKG6zndh+X+t5oSb8RFbxUoQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDWynAZR90BKiSMC+9jrADOKG6zndh+X+t5oSb8RFbxUoQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain
 of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /


--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:05:53PM -0500, Jacob Errington wrote:
> #2".
> {.i do melbi sei mi cusku} -> {.i mi cusku lo se du'u do melbi}
> {.i ui do cinba mi} -> {.i sei mi gleki do cinba mi} -> {.i mi gleki lo nu
> do cinba mi}
>=20
> Personally, I disapprove of sei-within-lu for partitioned quotes, for the
> simple reason that one can't unambiguously determine whether the sei-clau=
se
> is actually spoken, unless {sa'a} is used (which it usually isn't).

Would {sa'a} be used like this?

{.i lu mi gleki sei ko'a cusku se'usa'a zo'e li'u}, i.e. {sei ... se'usa'a}

This looks rather clumsy to me as a usable solution to ", he said,",
because you need to manually close the {sei} construct in order to attach t=
he sa'a.


v4hn

--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlDY6BsACgkQMBKLZs4+wjxj/QCfbaKAfkXJiZ3h1QuVNxv7mTlB
3nsAnAua/Nacw0gxM8moYE+Iat0O5jWq
=dK6x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--