Received: from mail-da0-f56.google.com ([209.85.210.56]:44234)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCV4BWUFTAARBEW646DAKGQEJ4KIBYQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TnZ9u-0004cT-1V; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:23:30 -0800
Received: by mail-da0-f56.google.com with SMTP id g9sf3160880dad.21
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:23:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=OW6uEakmEv3zfTI2Eql94hSW1hqO5BWfXBh9hOwmAHM=;
        b=BY8YzEYUY85jEjrgZtHPNUu7vVNOvUcCmYHP+tKFpa6lIz/gxjuc2g9hG83Rih1hL+
         zSZRSg80CDy4fW7WlqJF8LMy2bxlXqFr4pHj1Kmd1Q+clOt+KjnWuVDxR+scyR9Kpzkm
         oa0BFldcKibmxSa9yL7p3f01J/Q8oPtGKmfOzPKAkZ6+IHcI2Kz/BbLJDfquawxgSG7Z
         zdhctaca4QWtxmi6mtX+Qe8Fkljlt414IU61pcOrQmcGQWTtCIhske4nwnNEwDoL/twp
         D9nz+lUFxCHXibPOuze7Q+6A7AXSMntzve6svL8cdAZG5CrnhMt4QWE7oNHZ5lUuctF3
         zJsg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=OW6uEakmEv3zfTI2Eql94hSW1hqO5BWfXBh9hOwmAHM=;
        b=uSeT1uyTNPMeyXaMi56kOoKBPAPXa0RTqFt52fHr7jqJpPb1eBMOTRznPKmtpSZ/So
         xeCJ6Ik0q1w91PAB8nsxRUNDwYhhQZH6NuNHyy+CL+91W0HkUpJ++DNc4qptOHGWwPmP
         f8RQYJq4Z5irqn6T3cPyf06CnJH8QNQJKOP1bEaqOjs71JFqE2PPG6ZEt89+BALpNKBg
         qvrZ9l7ClInjyJkCf+f869SWN3fqZdzfwGbiC8Fru9b043kphTDz3xBvmf5LQmy/cXTm
         G8mk3NsSzC69yQ0q6V1cSAe2A2VJEQd4hM3+Y++Uih/qSQz3U6Spm6IXKsVj4Nj7HT/6
         MM6w==
X-Received: by 10.49.94.129 with SMTP id dc1mr3681995qeb.22.1356459795564;
        Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:23:15 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.107.35 with SMTP id gz3ls3185344qeb.52.gmail; Tue, 25 Dec
 2012 10:23:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.58.15.10 with SMTP id t10mr11634886vec.6.1356459794230;
        Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:23:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.58.15.10 with SMTP id t10mr11634884vec.6.1356459794203;
        Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com (mail-vb0-f46.google.com [209.85.212.46])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20si7351624vdg.3.2012.12.25.10.23.14
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.46;
Received: by mail-vb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b13so8146994vby.5
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.8.18 with SMTP id f18mr36230711vcf.14.1356459794084; Tue,
 25 Dec 2012 10:23:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.65.233 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:22:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <60b42266-009d-4fd8-a5e3-2bd3181095d4@googlegroups.com>
References: <11ecfede-d731-44b8-b71e-8aa427be0544@googlegroups.com>
 <CAOQ8VDWynAZR90BKiSMC+9jrADOKG6zndh+X+t5oSb8RFbxUoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <f1463e69-f8e4-407c-b4f2-680ff327ea17@googlegroups.com> <CAOQ8VDVe0DQTtiCSaWfWaKSHK+TEN+wUb2QkA3QHW=bYy5878g@mail.gmail.com>
 <e3bdb205-d6e5-4480-bc80-026bb79b4537@googlegroups.com> <CAMKwHj0tzqOR0i7PZYNMrqsM7fcTC6PTCwokiSY1kWF+64ETgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <60b42266-009d-4fd8-a5e3-2bd3181095d4@googlegroups.com>
From: Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:22:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOQ8VDVVwG=7gbvk02LG-ErkpFpm6i+mMKTn+irNYoUe2Y_-TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Comments inside quotations. {lu ... [sei ...se'u] ...
 li'u}. No solution?
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee3e22db4a304d1b1685e
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--bcaec54ee3e22db4a304d1b1685e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 25 December 2012 09:01, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 5:39:20 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
>>
>> Just as my-two-cents comment, I would like to say that I too dislike the
>> use of {sei ... se'u} for split quoting. As it stands right now, there
>> isn't really any other option, although I think I like the idea of FAlu for
>> that purpose, as gleki spoke of earlier.
>>
>
> I'll wait until tsani replies. I'm not a legislative power in Lojbanistan.
>
>
Haha, I'm glad to see people actually thinking that I have some voice
around here. Regardless, I don't really, given the dictatorial nature of
Lojbanistan.

To return to the main question, using sei to split quotes has some inherent
ambiguity; using sa'a merely diminishes it, I think. That being said, I
don't like the idea of split quotes at all. they seem unlojbanic,
especially considering that the resulting sentence is not a bridi. It's
just a free-floating sumti between two {.i}. I don't have any objections to
using FAlu, but I think that it's stylistically poor.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--bcaec54ee3e22db4a304d1b1685e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 25 December 2012 09:01, la gleki <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto=
:gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gma=
il_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-lef=
t:1ex">

<div class=3D"im"><br><br>On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 5:39:20 PM UTC+4, a=
ionys wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0;margin-left=
:0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Just as my-two-cents co=
mment, I would like to say that I too dislike the use of {sei ... se&#39;u}=
 for split quoting. As it stands right now, there isn&#39;t really any othe=
r option, although I think I like the idea of FAlu for that purpose, as gle=
ki spoke of earlier.<br clear=3D"all">

</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>I&#39;ll wait until tsani replies. I=
&#39;m not a legislative power in Lojbanistan.</div><div class=3D"im"><div>=
<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Haha, I&#39;m glad to see =
people actually thinking that I have some voice around here. Regardless, I =
don&#39;t really, given the dictatorial nature of Lojbanistan.</div>

<div><br></div><div>To return to the main question, using sei to split quot=
es has some inherent ambiguity; using sa&#39;a merely diminishes it, I thin=
k. That being said, I don&#39;t like the idea of split quotes at all. they =
seem unlojbanic, especially considering that the resulting sentence is not =
a bridi. It&#39;s just a free-floating sumti between two {.i}. I don&#39;t =
have any objections to using FAlu, but I think that it&#39;s stylistically =
poor.</div>

<div><br></div><div>.i mi&#39;e la tsani mu&#39;o</div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--bcaec54ee3e22db4a304d1b1685e--