Received: from mail-qc0-f191.google.com ([209.85.216.191]:36534) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TnwEk-0003o2-Bq; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:02:08 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f191.google.com with SMTP id h29sf5020405qcu.8 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=b9JD0jH52Yep4L7wGWBxOeIE5I19HkEiAjHUYXkxhPs=; b=AEHaVmNtscz4SdS0liE9tj/vuLJm5IuHfJTk02bR1EYTLv56mPVP0/yjZynYZQi9ys /MwguqOlRXt4yzMVBRW6EMkFc7NX4rMIDEygqo2juYZAteL/9cNzLy9Yo9v2fA/rrdyV oS51RoElWmtW79eU1PWaTOqXsug1sOEgUgW/0l1MZ0dUEmJ5xTor8hh1aDU2fZ+qb8n6 H65Y0Yx/ExDCdW4oRy+spbDVNnKEAFeqXcb/RAgyO/mFH2mn8OKWgE+m3gmllOJHL6DX fLAShclRAdiw0x+O9zG8uedbjh8iUI/9AVy9g+WXnSuLtbLa7y86Im80lZMaY5EgWm4y UwQg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=b9JD0jH52Yep4L7wGWBxOeIE5I19HkEiAjHUYXkxhPs=; b=ONN6yzU5P0kNK5+XiTKPElHZTasxiJ8Jmpz57V5uiec9kd8gERHSCcRG71GJsdmqky Giq8CmkpHyFPmXjdPxgs6BsXqh+aqyad5YUholJO5NwFNZ9TiPF7RJJsfMGnppQMrNvn S9v/YhYXLZ2srmo3oXzOA63yWQVjoCeMVe8Qmvvv7lGIbWfa9PDZ90JMmPxHFXHnZWyi pnPAdMNQmVuF4Lf/EyTuzTj+IKYk0bqnTGtqr8VHfoWttTPvisr7PugBvoSYRP5EUXGy OPxVv/mPjCXgZf2KsfYW8G6GN5salTHb4A+l0GQ2mz64xzS5CaOqM8EB8FRZvMaZ4SjD ap9Q== X-Received: by 10.50.203.9 with SMTP id km9mr7162129igc.7.1356548507183; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:47 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.222.129 with SMTP id qm1ls6442440igc.28.gmail; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:46 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.147.10 with SMTP id l10mr21472447icv.3.1356548506761; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:46 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.147.10 with SMTP id l10mr21472446icv.3.1356548506740; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ge7si2217209igb.0.2012.12.26.11.01.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.169; Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v19so8096197obq.28 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.169.18 with SMTP id aa18mr11675132oec.13.1356548506404; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:01:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0f113eb4-167d-4fe8-ac81-938752ef2647@googlegroups.com> References: <11ecfede-d731-44b8-b71e-8aa427be0544@googlegroups.com> <60b42266-009d-4fd8-a5e3-2bd3181095d4@googlegroups.com> <0f113eb4-167d-4fe8-ac81-938752ef2647@googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 12:01:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Comments inside quotations. {lu ... [sei ...se'u] ... li'u}. No solution? From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54b4a56d8478704d1c60f54 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec54b4a56d8478704d1c60f54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:40 PM, la gleki wrote: > On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 10:22:54 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote: > >> On 25 December 2012 09:01, la gleki wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 5:39:20 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>> >>>> Just as my-two-cents comment, I would like to say that I too dislike >>>> the use of {sei ... se'u} for split quoting. As it stands right now, there >>>> isn't really any other option, although I think I like the idea of FAlu for >>>> that purpose, as gleki spoke of earlier. >>>> >>> >>> I'll wait until tsani replies. I'm not a legislative power in >>> Lojbanistan. >>> >>> >> Haha, I'm glad to see people actually thinking that I have some voice >> around here. Regardless, I don't really, given the dictatorial nature of >> Lojbanistan. >> > > It doesn't matter. Any dictator will lose their power in Lojbanistan. > How many years has .camgusmis. AKA Robin been the BDFL? Also, I think the "For Life" part of his title kind of disproves your statement. > It's not that "controlled development" described by camgusmis in "Lojban > you are doing it wrong" essay. Fluent speakers + logical thinking decide > and I will ignore any dictators unless there are many of them. > In that you're about half-wrong. Lojban is a proscribed language, meaning that the meanings of words, the grammar, etc. are decided by an official body. Only this official body, known, by the way, as the BPFK, and the BDFL, who is the head of the BPFK, are able to make changes of any kind to the language. While it is certainly hoped that these people are logical in their thinking and have a more than passing knowledge of Lojban, such is not guaranteed. For example, when Robin assumed the title of BDFL, he was not, at that time, fluent. Self-admittedly. Since the birth of his daughters, he had become very proficient in Lojban and may consider himself fluent /now/, but that fluency or its lack was never a hindrance to the performance of his job on the BPFK or as the BDFL, because though his /vocabulary/ was lacking such that he was nowhere near fluent, his understanding of how Lojban /works/ was and still is excellent- and that's the important part when it comes to decisions about Lojban. > To return to the main question, using sei to split quotes has some >> inherent ambiguity; using sa'a merely diminishes it, I think. That being >> said, I don't like the idea of split quotes at all. they seem unlojbanic, >> especially considering that the resulting sentence is not a bridi. It's >> just a free-floating sumti between two {.i}. I don't have any objections to >> using FAlu, but I think that it's stylistically poor. >> > > Your reply appeared to be much easier than i could expect. > I also think it's a poor style. Nevetheless, if we apply {ju'e} then won't > it be > > xorxe's solution: {lu ko klama mi sei la alis cu cusku se'u i mi djica lo > nu catlu do li'u} (25 syllables) > gleki's second solution: {lu ko klama mi li'u se cusku la alis fa lu mi > djica lo nu catlu do li'u} (25 syllables, splitting sumti implies {ju'e}) > > ? > > If so there are no extra syllables compared to the previous solution. > > *pei*? > > > >> .i mi'e la tsani mu'o >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Uo7PX5vnJFAJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec54b4a56d8478704d1c60f54 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:40 PM, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 10:22:54 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:
On 25 December 2012 09:01, la g= leki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 5:39:20 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border= -left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Just as my-two-cents comment, I woul= d like to say that I too dislike the use of {sei ... se'u} for split qu= oting. As it stands right now, there isn't really any other option, alt= hough I think I like the idea of FAlu for that purpose, as gleki spoke of e= arlier.

I'll wait until tsani replies. I= 'm not a legislative power in Lojbanistan.


Haha, I'm glad to see people actual= ly thinking that I have some voice around here. Regardless, I don't rea= lly, given the dictatorial nature of Lojbanistan.

It doesn't matter. Any dic= tator will lose their power in Lojbanistan.

How = many years has .camgusmis. AKA Robin been the BDFL? Also, I think the "= ;For Life" part of his title kind of disproves your statement.
=A0
It's not that "contro= lled development" described by camgusmis in "Lojban you are doing= it wrong" essay. Fluent speakers + logical thinking decide and I will= ignore any dictators unless there are many of them.

In that you're about half-wrong. Lojban is a pros= cribed language, meaning that the meanings of words, the grammar, etc. are = decided by an official body. Only this official body, known, by the way, as= the BPFK, and the BDFL, who is the head of the BPFK, are able to make chan= ges of any kind to the language. While it is certainly hoped that these peo= ple are logical in their thinking and have a more than passing knowledge of= Lojban, such is not guaranteed. For example, when Robin assumed the title = of BDFL, he was not, at that time, fluent. Self-admittedly. Since the birth= of his daughters, he had become very proficient in Lojban and may consider= himself fluent /now/, but that fluency or its lack was never a hindrance t= o the performance of his job on the BPFK or as the BDFL, because though his= /vocabulary/ was lacking such that he was nowhere near fluent, his underst= anding of how Lojban /works/ was and still is excellent- and that's the= important part when it comes to decisions about Lojban.
=A0
To return to the main question, using sei to split quotes h= as some inherent ambiguity; using sa'a merely diminishes it, I think. T= hat being said, I don't like the idea of split quotes at all. they seem= unlojbanic, especially considering that the resulting sentence is not a br= idi. It's just a free-floating sumti between two {.i}. I don't have= any objections to using FAlu, but I think that it's stylistically poor= .

Your reply appeared to be much= easier =A0than i could expect.
I also think it's a poor styl= e. Nevetheless, if we apply {ju'e} then won't it be

xorxe's solution: {lu ko kla= ma mi sei la alis cu cusku se'u i mi djica lo nu catlu do li'u} (25= syllables)
gleki's second solution: =A0{lu ko klama mi li= 9;u se cusku la alis fa lu mi djica lo nu catlu do li'u} (25 syllables,= splitting sumti implies {ju'e})

?=

If so there are no extra syl= lables compared to the previous solution.

pei?
<= span style=3D"line-height:22px">


.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/Uo7PX5vnJFAJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec54b4a56d8478704d1c60f54--