Received: from mail-pb0-f58.google.com ([209.85.160.58]:44164) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1To3aM-0006I4-Dy; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:57 -0800 Received: by mail-pb0-f58.google.com with SMTP id xa7sf5146253pbc.23 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=ltNJwWQch+1wEIjtb5dPEoDihd09AJDHtgUK4z1G1zk=; b=tZsm/gZ21QPqHAY2QzgjxujaZIkvqmTjdwmjd5wXAc2Y3wGKVcbhx1jwqE7//J5Q5k z2h+87+S/Dq+Xzved6V8W3eV01UH6km+r5m6HWkpMUCrJyy1eNW5urDWeUVn1rHvLf8W xiDCLGe99zyxphYp6LMtXp/1wErvZ7bAyo3iAzHTYPPEy/y9EeKG1VFf3bJqXVv9RS4d D9tLL8wcMiZeoXkXHSHqnL4fPlNDHt6TYngYQ8CG5ZPHCWNDTFZGol24JObFQNn7Y+0T a96G4TrN3dZbw9J20iFB+d23zXN9NxDg79PD57GYTe9241NRy2Rynfu77ZuKRS2kxFbA vLXg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=ltNJwWQch+1wEIjtb5dPEoDihd09AJDHtgUK4z1G1zk=; b=Gnotmh0jnOzJ0fiTITitVQjGU8P7U++iqwlBBapuX5xYjKHACGJchqU68vNbD403S/ XKs5lxeIC3Wi9QP4quXiwvht4f+DdqmB6qotBsvI56Anw27EkD0gu/LvN4c7AJ4MMfEI v/DHmAo6KH1tfc1+Nqv+4c7LUn8T59M+aByfaVKRWWQrigkkfvLN08PnkFlACBWayiWs /zE2ctNYtXf0ta1dORlRPomMqiMjigw/gXJdFJD8WiQcgZ4zd5B83B+31bnQR3WehVkO upgBtJ+L8MHwlTpK/oQ5noXTMF0CY5oEcbV//7LgzsIowc+1JelVe1ULwRIaT306IBeo yO9Q== X-Received: by 10.49.87.1 with SMTP id t1mr4203418qez.41.1356576756034; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:36 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.16.37 with SMTP id c5ls3431446qed.80.gmail; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.213.102 with SMTP id nr6mr14629762vec.21.1356576755441; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.213.102 with SMTP id nr6mr14629761vec.21.1356576755422; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f51.google.com (mail-vb0-f51.google.com [209.85.212.51]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u2si1520316vdi.2.2012.12.26.18.52.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.51; Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fq11so9252946vbb.38 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.115.20 with SMTP id g20mr44726107vcq.31.1356576755271; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.13.197 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:52:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <44e6fb5c-91f3-47ba-817c-8560c9c6ca14@googlegroups.com> <50DB3C14.9060303@gmx.de> <20121226185805.GH7855@samsa.fritz.box> <3641882.8sMyCj0ouv@caracal> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] "Any" and {ro} From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0434c2ec9bca2e04d1cca30b X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d0434c2ec9bca2e04d1cca30b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To give a concrete example, consider the difference between {ci remna cu nanmu} and {ci lo remna cu nanmu}. The former says "there are exactly three humans that are male. The latter says that we're talking about some humans, three of whom are male. Note that the former is blatantly false, while the latter is true in plenty of contexts. mu'o mi'e la latro'a On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Ian Johnson wrote: > The similarity is nearly all syntactic; the semantics are entirely > different. {ci broda cu brode} is an extremely precise statement, saying > that there are exactly 3 brodas that brode. {ci lo broda cu brode} is an > imprecise statement, saying that there are some brodas that are relevant in > context, and three of them brode. It could be that *every* broda brodes > in the latter case, if only three brodas are contextually relevant. > > > mu'o mi'e la latro'a > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Ian Johnson wrote: >> >>> zo'e noi ... and da poi ... are completely and totally different. One >>> involves context, the other doesn't (or, in some interpretations, >>> "approximately doesn't", i.e. context can affect the universe of discourse >>> but in any case it is "large"). Moreover, PA lo broda cu brode doesn't >>> imply that no other broda1 brode, whereas PA broda cu brode does. >>> >> >> Those are two very small differences. They do not add up to "completely >> and totally". >> >> Both are a variable pro-sumti with an identifying clause attached. That >> spells "very similar" to me. >> >> >>> mu'o mi'e la latro'a >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 26 December 2012 14:09, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> pa plise = pa lo plise = "one of one or more things which actually is >>>>>> an apple" = an apple (as opposed to "that apple") >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> This was only true in pre-xorlo. Under the gadri proposal, {pa broda} >>>>> -> {pa da poi ke'a broda} directly. In xorlo, {pa broda} and {pa lo broda} >>>>> are thus very different. >>>>> >>>>> .i mi'e la tsani mu'o >>>>> >>>> >>>> No they aren't. >>>> >>>> {pa lo broda} = {pa zo'e noi ke'a broda} >>>> {pa broda} = {pa da poi ke'a broda} >>>> >>>> {zo'e noi...} and {da poi...} are very similar in meaning. The two >>>> phrases may not be "equal", but they are certainly still equivalent. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 19:58:05 v4hn wrote: >>>>>>> > The question is, what do you answer, if you _don't_ have a >>>>>>> specific one >>>>>>> > (or a group of specific ones) in mind, but {lo plise} is the most >>>>>>> specific >>>>>>> > thing you can say? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "lo co'e plise"? "lo nalsteci plise"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pierre >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "lojban" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d0434c2ec9bca2e04d1cca30b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To give a concrete example, consider the difference between {ci remna cu na= nmu} and {ci lo remna cu nanmu}. The former says "there are exactly th= ree humans that are male. The latter says that we're talking about some= humans, three of whom are male. Note that the former is blatantly false, w= hile the latter is true in plenty of contexts.

mu'o mi'e la latro'a

On W= ed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
The similarity is nearly all syntactic; the = semantics are entirely different. {ci broda cu brode} is an extremely preci= se statement, saying that there are exactly 3 brodas that brode. {ci lo bro= da cu brode} is an imprecise statement, saying that there are some brodas t= hat are relevant in context, and three of them brode. It could be that e= very broda brodes in the latter case, if only three brodas are contextu= ally relevant.


mu'o mi'e la latro'a

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:46 PM, = Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec = 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
zo'e noi ... and da poi ... are completely and totally different. One i= nvolves context, the other doesn't (or, in some interpretations, "= approximately doesn't", i.e. context can affect the universe of di= scourse but in any case it is "large"). Moreover, PA lo broda cu = brode doesn't imply that no other broda1 brode, whereas PA broda cu bro= de does.

Those are two very small differences. They do n= ot add up to "completely and totally".

Both are a variable= pro-sumti with an identifying clause attached. That spells "very simi= lar" to me.
=A0
mu'o mi'e la latro'a


On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
On Wed, Dec = 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> w= rote:
On 26 December 2012 14:09, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
pa plise =3D pa lo plise =3D "one of one or more things which actually= is an apple" =3D an apple (as opposed to "that apple")
=


This was only true in pre-xorlo. Under the gadri proposal, {pa broda} ->= {pa da poi ke'a broda} directly. In xorlo, {pa broda} and {pa lo broda= } are thus very different.

.i mi'e la tsa= ni mu'o

No they aren't.

{pa lo b= roda} =3D {pa zo'e noi ke'a broda}
{pa broda} =3D {pa da poi ke&= #39;a broda}

{zo'e noi...} and {da poi...} are very similar in m= eaning. The two phrases may not be "equal", but they are certainl= y still equivalent.
=A0
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@b= ezitopo.org> wrote:
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 19:58:0= 5 v4hn wrote:
> The question is, what do you answer, if you _don't_ have a specifi= c one
> (or a group of specific ones) in mind, but {lo plise} is the most spec= ific
> thing you can say?

"lo co'e plise"? "lo nalsteci plise"?

Pierre
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




=
--
mu'o mi'e .aio= nys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patf= u do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d0434c2ec9bca2e04d1cca30b--