Received: from mail-vb0-f60.google.com ([209.85.212.60]:34926) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1To3oF-0006LP-2w; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:07:20 -0800 Received: by mail-vb0-f60.google.com with SMTP id l22sf5144687vbn.5 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=2LBd8i/1SQ2JTRJoNpQoLg7fii9oR0dvLX6eQafYhM8=; b=QPkzZKr8gi44QS7j0QtlN27KZuCbID2Zf2Ugxg36QAEWcjluveY7hSx15hEgzQvge1 AyxLZErjXpU6apo3uBuIjTm/9FXSPNXO0/5GJsmjgBgE08y2NNkXit3yPfN1BGpOkM6z 5UUiQ8zXR7Qp59Y17JcMsZhLf1tS+t++Lc7x5lYS8Jm/ttXitNCqIU53O9e1x8gzfKSW 9l58mKnWSmANLvOf2PqE3KhmilRlbe4EpnFVJRHo3dFyYOl9w2Fri7MovPhOHNx18cVS B0LXn5EwL8OMjWt2U9yNPY1N5xjKxaVjzbRzafuDTpY9xev+8GFgrPVVOWG2a5Y3Np++ +mGQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=2LBd8i/1SQ2JTRJoNpQoLg7fii9oR0dvLX6eQafYhM8=; b=NTb/96Y6YRH/74uGz4zKp+Aiwtcxurdv/i8AA2g6N3ACm7kqoeYfEpmlsnoLDNnvus 8mI6OFSKw2kOmBiXaslDLualgieHTZnLBN+6sP+XUXCukOUueJN9V3yYl2TptcRcgk5o xh/m8q+lxStPLpukpH0LACw3dhoGPQSJdzwjz86Gr1OTr+Zn3fhY3MwwRAvN0C8TV79U Icf+sceRxGYP8JsDFFTMoXP4Weq8otO/bYPS0/L6GzXYYkGqcr1GzcugCYpwwlPtuSvT RuukoVg1HPWz8M7lxx8GwMnJtKkYBIkp5P9zNzZY4Lyl5wLSFf2ij4IOQNbkHm9ucDG0 cM+w== X-Received: by 10.50.108.200 with SMTP id hm8mr9873687igb.10.1356577616100; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:56 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.213.71 with SMTP id nq7ls10173687igc.37.canary; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:55 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.153.199 with SMTP id vi7mr25517170igb.0.1356577615180; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:55 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.153.199 with SMTP id vi7mr25517168igb.0.1356577615151; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com (mail-oa0-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vb4si1733298igb.2.2012.12.26.19.06.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.47; Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h1so8704991oag.34 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.172.229 with SMTP id bf5mr11719545oec.81.1356577614827; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:06:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <44e6fb5c-91f3-47ba-817c-8560c9c6ca14@googlegroups.com> <50DB3C14.9060303@gmx.de> <20121226185805.GH7855@samsa.fritz.box> <3641882.8sMyCj0ouv@caracal> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:06:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] "Any" and {ro} From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee86cd7907904d1ccd634 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec54ee86cd7907904d1ccd634 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Where do you think "exactly" comes from? Certainly not from {da}, whose definition is {sumka'i .i pamoi ke logji lairka'e snicne}. On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Ian Johnson wrote: > To give a concrete example, consider the difference between {ci remna cu > nanmu} and {ci lo remna cu nanmu}. The former says "there are exactly three > humans that are male. The latter says that we're talking about some humans, > three of whom are male. Note that the former is blatantly false, while the > latter is true in plenty of contexts. > > > mu'o mi'e la latro'a > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Ian Johnson wrote: > >> The similarity is nearly all syntactic; the semantics are entirely >> different. {ci broda cu brode} is an extremely precise statement, saying >> that there are exactly 3 brodas that brode. {ci lo broda cu brode} is an >> imprecise statement, saying that there are some brodas that are relevant in >> context, and three of them brode. It could be that *every* broda brodes >> in the latter case, if only three brodas are contextually relevant. >> >> >> mu'o mi'e la latro'a >> >> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Ian Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> zo'e noi ... and da poi ... are completely and totally different. One >>>> involves context, the other doesn't (or, in some interpretations, >>>> "approximately doesn't", i.e. context can affect the universe of discourse >>>> but in any case it is "large"). Moreover, PA lo broda cu brode doesn't >>>> imply that no other broda1 brode, whereas PA broda cu brode does. >>>> >>> >>> Those are two very small differences. They do not add up to "completely >>> and totally". >>> >>> Both are a variable pro-sumti with an identifying clause attached. That >>> spells "very similar" to me. >>> >>> >>>> mu'o mi'e la latro'a >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 26 December 2012 14:09, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> pa plise = pa lo plise = "one of one or more things which actually >>>>>>> is an apple" = an apple (as opposed to "that apple") >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> This was only true in pre-xorlo. Under the gadri proposal, {pa broda} >>>>>> -> {pa da poi ke'a broda} directly. In xorlo, {pa broda} and {pa lo broda} >>>>>> are thus very different. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i mi'e la tsani mu'o >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No they aren't. >>>>> >>>>> {pa lo broda} = {pa zo'e noi ke'a broda} >>>>> {pa broda} = {pa da poi ke'a broda} >>>>> >>>>> {zo'e noi...} and {da poi...} are very similar in meaning. The two >>>>> phrases may not be "equal", but they are certainly still equivalent. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 19:58:05 v4hn wrote: >>>>>>>> > The question is, what do you answer, if you _don't_ have a >>>>>>>> specific one >>>>>>>> > (or a group of specific ones) in mind, but {lo plise} is the most >>>>>>>> specific >>>>>>>> > thing you can say? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "lo co'e plise"? "lo nalsteci plise"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pierre >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>> >>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "lojban" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec54ee86cd7907904d1ccd634 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Where do you think "exactly" comes from? Certainly not from {da},= whose definition is {sumka'i .i pamoi ke logji lairka'e snicne}. <= br>
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Ian John= son <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
To give a concrete example, consider the dif= ference between {ci remna cu nanmu} and {ci lo remna cu nanmu}. The former = says "there are exactly three humans that are male. The latter says th= at we're talking about some humans, three of whom are male. Note that t= he former is blatantly false, while the latter is true in plenty of context= s.


mu'o mi'e la latro'a

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:49 PM, = Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
The similarity is nearly all syntactic; the = semantics are entirely different. {ci broda cu brode} is an extremely preci= se statement, saying that there are exactly 3 brodas that brode. {ci lo bro= da cu brode} is an imprecise statement, saying that there are some brodas t= hat are relevant in context, and three of them brode. It could be that e= very broda brodes in the latter case, if only three brodas are contextu= ally relevant.


mu'o mi'e la latro'a

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail= .com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec = 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com> wrote:
zo'e noi ... and da poi ... are completely and totally different. One i= nvolves context, the other doesn't (or, in some interpretations, "= approximately doesn't", i.e. context can affect the universe of di= scourse but in any case it is "large"). Moreover, PA lo broda cu = brode doesn't imply that no other broda1 brode, whereas PA broda cu bro= de does.

Those are two very small differences. They do n= ot add up to "completely and totally".

Both are a variable= pro-sumti with an identifying clause attached. That spells "very simi= lar" to me.
=A0
mu'o mi'e la latro'a


On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
On Wed, Dec = 26, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> w= rote:
On 26 December 2012 14:09, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
pa plise =3D pa lo plise =3D "one of one or more things which actually= is an apple" =3D an apple (as opposed to "that apple")
=


This was only true in pre-xorlo. Under the gadri proposal, {pa broda} ->= {pa da poi ke'a broda} directly. In xorlo, {pa broda} and {pa lo broda= } are thus very different.

.i mi'e la tsa= ni mu'o

No they aren't.

{pa lo b= roda} =3D {pa zo'e noi ke'a broda}
{pa broda} =3D {pa da poi ke&= #39;a broda}

{zo'e noi...} and {da poi...} are very similar in m= eaning. The two phrases may not be "equal", but they are certainl= y still equivalent.
=A0
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@b= ezitopo.org> wrote:
On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 19:58:0= 5 v4hn wrote:
> The question is, what do you answer, if you _don't_ have a specifi= c one
> (or a group of specific ones) in mind, but {lo plise} is the most spec= ific
> thing you can say?

"lo co'e plise"? "lo nalsteci plise"?

Pierre
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




=
--
mu'o mi'e .aio= nys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patf= u do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec54ee86cd7907904d1ccd634--