Received: from mail-vb0-f64.google.com ([209.85.212.64]:53966)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDA4JGNARYDBBEM256DAKGQEEDAUPTQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1To4zY-0006ev-Vw; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:23:08 -0800
Received: by mail-vb0-f64.google.com with SMTP id fq11sf5156286vbb.29
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:22:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=Oaw8sqyLtDho18iJNX7/wcKaGHoWkV+/m2NTFVgDTHY=;
        b=g1K2BCFnARtJCZCTIU44PeR390qI/JZ45OZPZ+Sd9SjhmH+FqVaouj/oeAZ4w0qje9
         gl+JWEDmjTDLHFcmwZO1yST6pOqXL3R908vJUfTvvDvIGPA9vN0NanB70rPU+cebpF4a
         HoXqtYweFbLcGKtFbOvdmzhANB/LGnXRjFHJlImU2TNyHwd2PhuexfAnXvHT58ITK+ZL
         vopTEIIN2FdqGkJghmKVcTEZzcEKQe2otgLYd4QihUobjWsBfWzThODD+XzY0AHLuPJw
         pVmtlCWHRsGgzBmgzMh3UdL5opW1J+Q2qydg7cXLQfkv52aj0FANyym+kbjmZyWlq/Dk
         5CDQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=Oaw8sqyLtDho18iJNX7/wcKaGHoWkV+/m2NTFVgDTHY=;
        b=Bq5ellXq4uNFOIfGPQ8cKzLvgORyDKHuHyL0zqXQ7TVagNhDaQDBQ9bJwarzxPthsc
         i0kkuM5o0X3inT3wsNW1COoWjQqBZImn1aTtDCA3JmnIiPPXD9AM3YvHGJpQL+2sGAfO
         VJYEdxQ1EzMnlCAnjxCRiSLhAWkFEHZSZu9i1ykm7/RbHxNrhs4pPaGpj8FLFeFxVNf5
         VJhGz+zjNyDuDEoiXdv+vDMyMzRqTc+oAtYwhyggmNeqH7UqrRmZj8O2DHcXlbZEPC2R
         yg1/lokFnsBOX14t9dfzyaHh743R84qMLiLBc5YEAiXVd2ZIJcbczejzGT9wN5VVRw/f
         aRXA==
X-Received: by 10.50.53.168 with SMTP id c8mr6649082igp.17.1356582162071;
        Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:22:42 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.36.168 with SMTP id r8ls10914073igj.40.canary; Wed, 26 Dec
 2012 20:22:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.203.84 with SMTP id fh20mr14801818icb.20.1356582161617;
        Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:22:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.203.84 with SMTP id fh20mr14801817icb.20.1356582161606;
        Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:22:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vb13si2322544igb.2.2012.12.26.20.22.41
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:22:41 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178;
Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id eh20so8520974obb.9
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:22:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.32.200 with SMTP id l8mr12801944oei.43.1356582161358; Wed,
 26 Dec 2012 20:22:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:22:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj1saNHF7uXyLJ0bd2b0rJpC4qk0w+OeR_C5rbqe9t3amw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <44e6fb5c-91f3-47ba-817c-8560c9c6ca14@googlegroups.com>
	<50DB3C14.9060303@gmx.de>
	<20121226185805.GH7855@samsa.fritz.box>
	<3641882.8sMyCj0ouv@caracal>
	<CAMKwHj2amJeLn5umkq6V6Xbg3sEsKmQknvur_qS_7xOfeff-sA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOQ8VDUaMGK7hfXXMGSDuan6H-1ZyDwESvF0-n4u1+dM9K1W1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj16BFcsPJnGh=2FVfOmFPwaTDNz2ueJ6zuzRw5+JTUQ5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+gZtg+92sX4nUvrLCurZaa2fxW6-tZR-GC3Pzhk7ErpKauEZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj2-EKdYm=Mzsq-12buHr7s2vvgrc_qgv3zw6d3bWpay_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+gZtgJuiday_CK+jKFB5G=o7E1mONa4YvAtOXnZ=WjAX5sPmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+gZtgKWzu-RjFB8t1X8mi0V1uMrOPempb0QjshjBVT=2mXDHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj05p2W5Oz5uj6_JENSfzn3yeN4kS-tmsc6kXJKc-rqatg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1356578353.49070.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<1356579813.57137.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<CAMKwHj1saNHF7uXyLJ0bd2b0rJpC4qk0w+OeR_C5rbqe9t3amw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:22:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMKwHj0f7S16386aT1ktxAFM63EkUtT-3VT7+iRebMd3sFVJDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] "Any" and {ro}
From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1f5b0d61de004d1cde5e9
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--e89a8fb1f5b0d61de004d1cde5e9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Fine, whatever. Whether or not I'm wrong about the equivalence of {pa
plise} and {pa lo plise}, my statement that {pa plise} suffices for "any
apple" is still valid.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--e89a8fb1f5b0d61de004d1cde5e9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Fine, whatever. Whether or not I&#39;m wrong about the equivalence of {pa plise} and {pa lo plise}, my statement that {pa plise} suffices for &quot;any apple&quot; is still valid.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e .aionys.<br>
<br>.i.e&#39;ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo&#39;o<br>(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )<br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.<br />



--e89a8fb1f5b0d61de004d1cde5e9--