Received: from mail-wg0-f56.google.com ([74.125.82.56]:61932) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ToEZk-0001p6-VE; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:37:02 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f56.google.com with SMTP id 12sf3900149wgh.21 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:36:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=rkqRXDSO4GLKyaU7qgx9SlM8zq2v2MSBEq9qOr8loaU=; b=KmGR2pF7x/WuR5hgWBTBMG9OHtQe1DJfeFhzCly+3b41xRlx2FxK2bbaomXQX4Xg52 5Nao3AskbgBTA4PmVGuR9Lhp23jdvHpj64K1tU6YG/I4ML0MAuwVLN7bwEd96IdAFggz KJ2aUmZ96BRCkzbR+/FfyDlN5lDfFFodVzbSED64yGCBWILIBzy+Gj5Hzz1Rvoj1ekFk B1kEXcUaLm6QQpz5K+dGqzXOX9UO+gFM7XJL1fOBS/WXbUnRUkztClW7IyEVRCyvHFW6 ZGivna7aBn4U9EDosILOYYyOEE34vSg0XVMgeQEaBbvpnYBjfiavuOCtDQ9LV0bJppHo Fkyg== X-Received: by 10.181.11.164 with SMTP id ej4mr4886718wid.4.1356619001058; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:36:41 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.89.212 with SMTP id bq20ls1501766wib.38.gmail; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:36:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.214.197 with SMTP id c45mr38940828eep.7.1356619000222; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:36:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.214.197 with SMTP id c45mr38940825eep.7.1356619000192; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z44si11387479een.0.2012.12.27.06.36.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 27 Dec 2012 06:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-4dbabe02.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.190.2]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 769B086514B for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:36:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:36:38 +0100 From: v4hn To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] "Any" and {ro} Message-ID: <20121227143638.GJ7855@samsa.fritz.box> References: <1356578353.49070.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1356579813.57137.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121227122817.GI7855@samsa.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YPJ8CVbwFUtL7OFW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --YPJ8CVbwFUtL7OFW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:39:14AM -0500, Ian Johnson wrote: > ko dunda pa plise mi is "make it true that there exists exactly one apple > that you give to me." > If you have an apple in mind and say that, then you're not conveying > that you have one in mind at all. Completely understood and absolutely right. However, as far as I can see {ko dunda pa plise mi} does not explicitly say whether or not you have a specific apple in mind. It's just, that I didn't specify it, if I have one in mind. In my opinion it's still a valid counterquestion to ask "Which one?" here, don't you think so? Also, if you answer with {pa plise} again, it might be a bit stupid, but still it's a reasonable answer to say "I got that part, but which one do you want?" in my opinion. The question is, whether there is a way to _spell out_ that you _don't_ have one in mind instead of omitting further information and waiting for the listener to recognize the conversational implicature. No such way, which does not explicitly state {ko cuxna} or {mi na pensi lo selsteci}, was mentioned up to now _as far as I understood everything_ and even the {ko dunda da poi plise ku'o mi} seems to rest on a very strong conversational implicature instead of explicitly stating that you don't care/know which one you'll get. That is because it doesn't seem to be a problem to me to add {ko dunda da poi plise ku'o mi .ije mi djica lonu do dunda lo zunle traji mi}. However, it is weird to say something like "Give me any apple. I want the leftmost one." or "Gib mir irgendeinen Apfel. Ich will den ganz Linken." (in my mother tongue). Any opinions? v4hn --YPJ8CVbwFUtL7OFW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlDcXPYACgkQMBKLZs4+wjydcACffgZX6Ws/nHxvKBDajVH7kP2E tDsAmwdMyOKLorYPoz/sAc/AbM/NaaQY =Bxga -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YPJ8CVbwFUtL7OFW--