Received: from mail-da0-f58.google.com ([209.85.210.58]:52486) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ToGIm-0003Ay-5Z; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:27:34 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f58.google.com with SMTP id a18sf5468340dak.23 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:27:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=3vd51dtlMympitDleTVvR0EPj7XQWQcgYvOn2XCcb8A=; b=jqGRluon6ZwlDwMgDscHsZClugEU0BKQkrIeM0rs4WopYZ/U97plz19YVR4Y0dtuld pRAzVkJEHGAOYa15WB+xAU4dfeCjq4xl9jDCfwyjTx9Pnl+rInVv3eWCbz+dgmAR/kMr 2w8CL5UlJBMylAJbUeF3EN3xj8SMgjvBUoSMrkEqnaRL48VxKIPnbVshDrZQhkY9k0Mg 5iHcMxa1cPhmmtQbvxBjJKorEDIa+2/Ul3uJR4cyk3/i6CclyPvg64FmlWszfncPtz6B lN5a+KP3LLPEizMT7zWE1r1LVc5hJazEZvT8oTr+dcbkZD1NGWBvyeFJwYF1oYkK65aB kQbA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=3vd51dtlMympitDleTVvR0EPj7XQWQcgYvOn2XCcb8A=; b=GsyhL9e/nmqReENzc+xlRXxbkTY7/6HAgPirvkvMmvmRicJvRRLXIKh05L+HJ0zFGu x7QqcJMFXYoT7ek9cI0GDm+mJ5D2GV5wzPuTRWLyQKhb/SXMZA+Fe4N+TwgP7d/bVlRV itVPeH36+dXuZL7QmiKeuOtGoJBiK8PpZ+8uN+cHeL5gTVLtu1yLJF2XdvwC2/oKd1V6 M0fBvrqtu9msqp6B21VqegMtf+ahutrorbgPrVpP/qcpBy3JVW5EE5f6fIhqXENk1DkP JxNlroOWAW/PwbAvSAHPGa2rBW6jZVfvJFtukbVoCeM0AfqbvXuStZ26Fct+XIEa/BnN l/Ag== X-Received: by 10.49.128.166 with SMTP id np6mr4704086qeb.31.1356625637710; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:27:17 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.35.38 with SMTP id e6ls4407341qej.49.gmail; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:27:17 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.15.38 with SMTP id u6mr4710558qec.8.1356625637307; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:27:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:27:16 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20121227143638.GJ7855@samsa.fritz.box> References: <1356578353.49070.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1356579813.57137.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121227122817.GI7855@samsa.fritz.box> <20121227143638.GJ7855@samsa.fritz.box> Subject: Re: [lojban] "Any" and {ro} MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1403_22424144.1356625636776" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_1403_22424144.1356625636776 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thursday, December 27, 2012 6:36:38 PM UTC+4, v4hn wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:39:14AM -0500, Ian Johnson wrote: > > ko dunda pa plise mi is "make it true that there exists exactly one > apple > > that you give to me." > > > If you have an apple in mind and say that, then you're not conveying > > that you have one in mind at all. > > Completely understood and absolutely right. > > However, as far as I can see {ko dunda pa plise mi} does not explicitly > say whether or not you have a specific apple in mind. > Pardon for a silly question. But if you have something in mind, isn't it an attitudinal? > It's just, that I didn't specify it, if I have one in mind. > In my opinion it's still a valid counterquestion to ask "Which one?" here, > don't you think so? > > Also, if you answer with {pa plise} again, it might be a bit stupid, but > still > it's a reasonable answer to say "I got that part, but which one do you > want?" > in my opinion. > > The question is, whether there is a way to _spell out_ that you _don't_ > have one in mind instead of omitting further information and waiting > for the listener to recognize the conversational implicature. > > No such way, which does not explicitly state {ko cuxna} or {mi na pensi lo > selsteci}, > was mentioned up to now _as far as I understood everything_ > and even the {ko dunda da poi plise ku'o mi} seems to rest on a very > strong > conversational implicature instead of explicitly stating that you don't > care/know which one you'll get. > > That is because it doesn't seem to be a problem to me to add > > {ko dunda da poi plise ku'o mi .ije mi djica lonu do dunda lo zunle traji > mi}. > > However, it is weird to say something like "Give me any apple. I want the > leftmost one." > or "Gib mir irgendeinen Apfel. Ich will den ganz Linken." (in my mother > tongue). > > > Any opinions? > > > v4hn > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/cfY0izY1mqAJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_1403_22424144.1356625636776 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, December 27, 2012 6:36:38 PM UTC+4, v4hn wrote:On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:39:14AM -0= 500, Ian Johnson wrote:
> ko dunda pa plise mi is "make it true that there exists exactly on= e apple
> that you give to me."

> If you have an apple in mind and say that, then you're not conveyi= ng
> that you have one in mind at all.

Completely understood and absolutely right.

However, as far as I can see {ko dunda pa plise mi} does not explicitly
say whether or not you have a specific apple in mind.


Pardon for a silly ques= tion. 
But if you have something in mind, isn't it an attitu= dinal?
 
I= t's just, that I didn't specify it, if I have one in mind.
In my opinion it's still a valid counterquestion to ask "Which one?" he= re,
don't you think so?

Also, if you answer with {pa plise} again, it might be a bit stupid, bu= t still
it's a reasonable answer to say "I got that part, but which one do you = want?"
in my opinion.

The question is, whether there is a way to _spell out_ that you _don't_
have one in mind instead of omitting further information and waiting
for the listener to recognize the conversational implicature.

No such way, which does not explicitly state {ko cuxna} or {mi na pensi= lo selsteci},
was mentioned up to now _as far as I understood everything_
and even the {ko dunda da poi plise ku'o mi} seems to rest on a very st= rong
conversational implicature instead of explicitly stating that you don't
care/know which one you'll get.

That is because it doesn't seem to be a problem to me to add

{ko dunda da poi plise ku'o mi .ije mi djica lonu do dunda lo zunle tra= ji mi}.

However, it is weird to say something like "Give me any apple. I want t= he leftmost one."
or "Gib mir irgendeinen Apfel. Ich will den ganz Linken." (in my mother= tongue).


Any opinions?


v4hn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/cf= Y0izY1mqAJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_1403_22424144.1356625636776--