Received: from mail-ea0-f188.google.com ([209.85.215.188]:43513) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ToNMj-0007KB-9m; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:00:09 -0800 Received: by mail-ea0-f188.google.com with SMTP id l12sf4097899eaa.25 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:59:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=4ztDgLwpsNjbWFqVkV5r/W/4VlbQjs1Xt/bPma4MTT4=; b=cBLsHkmlpQfkXM8olg6jw5L1B+4mRLjIUyX9aWyocFMlQ5dPH22ai5/yafI8GIhUpz Io6pu2QgtsQ26goi8i+jz20DOErCHkM6hPZDD2QVlFWVEZjh3/ARLO+imVIJ8gJzY2eE 2Om9mMjkSe62X9L3n8oZQj2KIKHUkFVuIuG06VR0LCsRUobFLMvZxjktnj5tF4jw/8p5 l52/ghE+9Ap+bGCUtYaMorNc+PNjpc7N6PZZxhCvN/gxkEXiFblTN52Z1pyPgsDMABB9 YtBsT/kmGPpZhxucqB/zNhco1oe5gh5hIX5Bg9Cm3dAOKMParWk6YjV3n3260knNBghq 2bCw== X-Received: by 10.180.101.195 with SMTP id fi3mr4190568wib.20.1356652789570; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:59:49 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.84.98 with SMTP id x2ls5098905wiy.27.canary; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:59:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.205.194 with SMTP id j42mr40750574eeo.2.1356652788108; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:59:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.205.194 with SMTP id j42mr40750572eeo.2.1356652788025; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:59:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z44si11934495een.0.2012.12.27.15.59.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:59:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-4dbabe02.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.190.2]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4ABCC86506E for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:59:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:59:46 +0100 From: v4hn To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? Message-ID: <20121227235946.GQ7855@samsa.fritz.box> References: <20121119185210.GM28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121119190007.GF27366@sunflowerriver.org> <20121119193023.GN28469@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121227222129.GN7855@samsa.fritz.box> <20121227222753.GG18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121227231105.GO7855@samsa.fritz.box> <20121227232206.GI18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121227232732.GP7855@samsa.fritz.box> <20121227233537.GJ18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="de1H0RjRxOSdb4we" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121227233537.GJ18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --de1H0RjRxOSdb4we Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 03:35:38PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I don't have the time to even do this; look at the TODO file and > other documentation. Sorry. >=20 > > Also, are github pull requests processed? Some of them are quite > > old. >=20 > See above. I hope to get back to it some day, but between two > girlfriends, two jobs, and two infant daughters, I've been > crushingly busy. Fair enough. As you mention over and over again that you really don't have any time at all, it might really be a good idea to formally reinstantiate the BPFK, but that's not really something /I/ should talk about... =2Ei mi baza jundi le datnyvei to la'a toi mi'e la .van. mu'o --de1H0RjRxOSdb4we Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlDc4PIACgkQMBKLZs4+wjwy4wCgqCpeNX5V/wuFImS9Yu8AGbSz 244AnApzsdWJjh6kRyoLWZlyHNK8UZIi =kCzx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --de1H0RjRxOSdb4we--