Received: from mail-la0-f64.google.com ([209.85.215.64]:61318)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDUNF3UDXIJBBTNI7CDAKGQEREECIIY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Tohpm-0007Ex-MQ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:51:37 -0800
Received: by mail-la0-f64.google.com with SMTP id fq13sf342954lab.29
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:51:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from
         :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type
         :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=ghz6lEAgtIkd1SF4hOqNSDnS2Pj2SpyjCgvpfIbPBA0=;
        b=OUjBCWonYfUfRSGzmFnYSqu8XDNWgzHFuZRnVrJWN86GjZvJihDgq0zR0uBwbdPnrw
         4RVe3lSaf/M2XuaMaB7nSpX9k7gouXX6aQ6/yTToF4GD/U+vUCAXtjFINA85hHU+iN++
         SmAM4dD5komD+7dprX4jkEQgiayGxIxwQWmvWh7crTRXDXBORZN/WpX2ADK6/jcdk6H1
         oRRJW/KF6ec2zOF/3NL/JeyS9VN2g3qjC6aj2iv+o7k2prEoJ1ctUeZXlWeVqeXBlFRh
         oussWURnVxwMeCEy2mtsQ2+r0fofrwDJSyt5GoXbQn1aA03U0vYsOkNatcYmtfn/H96c
         IXfQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.86.165 with SMTP id q5mr4700342wiz.16.1356731469814;
        Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:51:09 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.92.202 with SMTP id co10ls5588073wib.25.canary; Fri, 28
 Dec 2012 13:51:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.14.208.198 with SMTP id q46mr44373219eeo.0.1356731468994;
        Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:51:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.14.208.198 with SMTP id q46mr44373218eeo.0.1356731468978;
        Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z44si12955993een.0.2012.12.28.13.51.08
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119;
Received: from samsa (brln-4dba9a31.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.154.49])
	by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DC258865018
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 22:51:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 22:51:07 +0100
From: v4hn <me@v4hn.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation?
Message-ID: <20121228215107.GR7855@samsa.fritz.box>
References: <20121227222129.GN7855@samsa.fritz.box>
 <20121227222753.GG18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <20121227231105.GO7855@samsa.fritz.box>
 <20121227232206.GI18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <20121227232732.GP7855@samsa.fritz.box>
 <20121227233537.GJ18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <20121227235946.GQ7855@samsa.fritz.box>
 <20121228000348.GL18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAMKwHj2WkyJHuG13rVE37=MY6mw5oFGouAvP1PL0RVFMhv9ruA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121228185329.GO18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="brdEIFGMNIjz5YJG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121228185329.GO18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain
 of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /


--brdEIFGMNIjz5YJG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:53:29AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> There is no real task list at this time.  The big projects I have in
> my head are the CLL updates for xorlo, finishing a dictionary
> and making a less crappy jbovlaste.
>=20
> -Robin

What's up with http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Procedure and the checkpoint=
s?
I know it says "obsolete" there, but still it is well thought out
and looks like a good infrastracture to get going again.

I know the BPFK is not dead, I recognize a lot of names on the member list,
and I haven't been around for too long. But it looks like that to me
because there weren't /any/ "official" announcements concerning decisions or
even new official proposals or any other progress within the last year.
I only heard of a couple of draft-proposals by people who explicitly state
that they are _not_ members of the BPFK and some complains about
infrastructure/tools which need fixing (jbovlaste, autoposting of texts,
TeX-problems, ...). This is no development, it's maintenance as far as I ca=
n see.

Again though, I'm only became interested in lojban last year,
so I'm really not the one to give speeches...


v4hn

--brdEIFGMNIjz5YJG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlDeFEsACgkQMBKLZs4+wjwpTACaAlI2jGGTHAnuHp3crqcaYIni
NhEAoI+broBNuMU6GgQdOAp8RcBxnv3r
=pcz7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--brdEIFGMNIjz5YJG--