Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:38468) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ToiCe-0007MI-Dq; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:15:16 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f189.google.com with SMTP id c11sf6371015qca.16 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:14:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from :to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=WIVW+c4OCKSD1r0WBDOZMKlJtf+nev8TrxWOV3g15FE=; b=jepPa1Azv0iP5pKzmxDz75RNOpcbkIhsT5C9AcsAv4N8R3uPPCxdzasuenhrzD3jcg MlrAcTjzXqIl7+MsnqsVvuUvxC75iAtytZ3i63maSjz50Ry4vG+rUUIVYTAhd/3ma4VL NuFCIFNJnvLQGd3+cel1tu/Pn3DUN04lCTIVSyi5bqZOpLMkbjiVglnMos9nFEJqfw4j GMs1R40PCfUZee86iPk0QuCYsda711dQP+bWzXYlwoOoQfRNGA2G+QDj/p01gvqI5Dsg FNfpWqpZX+juQgGUDGsBqPs4Y++cT5bPDEWdzoI7v8HA6q8fIinNEdxJcKjjGUi/krlu x3CQ== X-Received: by 10.50.203.9 with SMTP id km9mr9270672igc.7.1356732888741; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:14:48 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.76.202 with SMTP id m10ls8240013igw.26.gmail; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:14:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.86.73 with SMTP id n9mr5906293paz.17.1356732888087; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:14:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.86.73 with SMTP id n9mr5906292paz.17.1356732888078; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:14:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uz6si6891201pbc.0.2012.12.28.14.14.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:14:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ToiCV-0007MC-4k for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:14:47 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:14:47 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL 1.1/ CLL 2.0. What is your opinion in the current situation? Message-ID: <20121228221446.GP18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20121227222753.GG18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121227231105.GO7855@samsa.fritz.box> <20121227232206.GI18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121227232732.GP7855@samsa.fritz.box> <20121227233537.GJ18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121227235946.GQ7855@samsa.fritz.box> <20121228000348.GL18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121228185329.GO18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20121228215107.GR7855@samsa.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121228215107.GR7855@samsa.fritz.box> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:51:07PM +0100, v4hn wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:53:29AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > There is no real task list at this time. The big projects I > > have in my head are the CLL updates for xorlo, finishing a > > dictionary and making a less crappy jbovlaste. > > > > -Robin > > What's up with http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Procedure and the > checkpoints? I know it says "obsolete" there, but still it is well > thought out and looks like a good infrastracture to get going > again. No-one did any of the work; eventually I got tired of doing all the work myself, and/or *constantly* having to harass people. That's a slight exaggeration, but only slight; certainly other people helped, extensively in some cases, but it was *always* a struggle, and eventually I stopped struggling, and nothing has happened since. This happens a lot around here. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.