Received: from mail-vb0-f60.google.com ([209.85.212.60]:51312) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TpopL-0004v5-Uk; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:40 -0800 Received: by mail-vb0-f60.google.com with SMTP id l22sf7684822vbn.15 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=RK61FpJQsPiHsPBErgCzGywfVjx5T1Na1/FaFLrTaWo=; b=EbtQpk8e2S6Pm+6Ue95j0abEzvzdIPu7RligJEcHFltTv127MPXNffgXFB6i1hIx7u XTyDfLtDNpAgoV2qRM9IwY59nAp2VneGtU7twRE4CtinCM9+p7Qw1DhvRgsNJl38UKSw v6Zy+uXLs84Avzk3kECgPWfKA85gfzjbKeOIG5sgcWOtY9QRebSZY4Bhq/mpVz0T6Ec8 8jCA2/sl2LNOral6rvqxy7DP/6xLsGvQhgi0ZMVleCEhsLA2kUl04JAOVlced7XMzO6B 1NwE3ETkRuZf7OFIEQKtKGAnxe5/gyZo4L2Eid/ZcHKL2Z/Fz5k9Pmb4/CV1Zy5BoEdU EPmQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=RK61FpJQsPiHsPBErgCzGywfVjx5T1Na1/FaFLrTaWo=; b=fsvnFIzWp+nyWTRmguR6aG/KxRTqCd0E+5TeYmCE7WWhCGmy0Po0IQ6LA/MWl0yF4J iliIm2oU/3nRs7rjTfPsXTJr6kWUynKXEGZCSuzeI05FZ4ClBsSjbghFA/HqRgkBA5lV AcmcCfN/JyOsSD01RCPH8Ew8ScBrDaHWxKAH3ua1QqvQmoLf6zRF8ZqCFwHxKIbaii24 8Od9E6NLZY+ZZjLz1HlrokhcAd12/CpZn+huWOyOabCjxcglMQisSb6oIQ7R7b0z16ld 0ltO5lNfpYLQyTFZsYT21jOGfqj1If6BGV13XDTl2pI1CLbo8f1HE8VIv9WrDBBi8dhS tSSA== X-Received: by 10.50.42.194 with SMTP id q2mr13564022igl.11.1356996681027; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:21 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.194.200 with SMTP id hy8ls9562962igc.3.gmail; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.123.142 with SMTP id s14mr24666163icr.0.1356996680045; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.123.142 with SMTP id s14mr24666162icr.0.1356996680004; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com (mail-oa0-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hw1si3821918igc.3.2012.12.31.15.31.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.50; Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n16so12176001oag.9 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.13.73 with SMTP id f9mr22848239oec.131.1356996679663; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:31:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1356994322.96794.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1356994322.96794.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:31:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni} From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb202760d80a804d22e6979 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8fb202760d80a804d22e6979 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John E Clifford wrote: > Sorry, to intrude philosophy (or theology) into this, but a case can be > made that the only actual god has no worshipers, since all have worshiped > imperfect simulcra of it -- and always will, even though they keep trying > to get it right. It is hard to worhsip the ineffable without effing a bit > -- and thus missing. > And that is precisely why I don't have truck with philosophy. I see absolutely no point in discussing things which can not be proven one way or the other. God is unknowable in every aspect, number, gender, temperament, existence. There is no way for us to find out anything about the true nature of (the) god(s), and so there's no point that I can see in bothering with trying. And like pretty much everything ever thought of by philosophers, if and when we do figure out a way to make such things knowable, we'll probably find out that all the philosophers were wrong. Also, "the only actual god" sounds very Judeo-Christian. How could possibly know whether lo cevni is singular? Maybe there's three, or 20, or a million. The only thing we can say we know for certain is that we don't know anything. > ------------------------------ > *From:* Jonathan Jones > *To:* lojban@googlegroups.com > *Sent:* Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32 PM > *Subject:* Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni} > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > > Well, it just means that if I wanted to talk about a god who existed > whether or not ey was worshipped I'd need to use a zi'evla or {cevni be > zi'o}. A priest might call the Christian god {lo cevni be zi'o bei roda}. > > > Is there a such thing as a god which does not have worshipers? Granted, > there are gods which do have worshipers /now/, but they did at one point, > and I know of no gods that have never, at any time, had any worshipers at > all. > > > Even if you don't like philosophy, this is still a linguistic issue. In > English, the Goa'uld are *not* gods, even though they are worshiped as > gods; in lojban (assuming your definition as canonical, which makes sense) > they *are* gods *because* they are worshiped as such.* > > > *... to the people who worship them. > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Meh. I don't have any truck with philosophers in general. > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > > Seems like this would interact nicely with the setting of *American Gods*, > where {lo cevni be noda} are literally dying mostly because {noda ra cevni}. > > I think some theist philosophers would disagree with your definition, > though; it's, in a sense, very anthropocentric; {pu ji'a sai lo nu zasti lo > remna ku la .jegvon. ze'e ca cevni fi ro da} > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > > So it seems like your notion of {cevni} focuses more centrally on worship > and dominion than on divinity. > > > No, it focus entirely on status. Their servants thought they were gods, we > know they aren't. If someone think that X is god, then to that person, {da > cevni}. If someone else does not think X is a god, or alternatively /knows/ > that X isn't, hen to /that/ person, {da na cevni}. > > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, .arpis. wrote: > > Which is why I say misleading and not incorrect. > > Also, {la'oi Goa'uld cevni xu} by your definition (ignore if you haven't > seen Stargate SG-1)? > > > {.i go'i jenai go'i .i na cevni mi to fangypre po'o toi .i cevni lo gy. > remna selfu} > Yes and no. Not gods to me (just aliens), but gods to their human servants. > > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, .arpis. wrote: > > Then I believe that the jbovlaste definition of {cevni} is misleading: > > Definition: x1 is a/the god/deity of people(s)/religion x2 with dominion > over x3 [sphere]; x1 is divine. > > note the secondary definition. I would consider angels to be divine. > > > Well, then you're using a different sense of the word "divine" than > jbovlaste is, because the sense of "divine" in the English definition of > {cevni} is "(of or pertaining to a god): deific, godlike, godly", whereas > you seem to be meaning "(eternal, holy): hallowed, holy, sacred". > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Even demons, and if you stretch the meaning /really/ far, djinn. > > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, .arpis. wrote: > > xu se cumki smuni lo ka ce'u ge angeli gi cevni > > > {cevni} can refer to many different things, but not angels. Gods, > goddesses, demi-god(esse)s, oni, and so on and so forth. > > But not angels. Angels are not gods, they aren't even god-like. Except for > maybe the archangels, they're barely above humans, and in many ways are > lower on the totem pole (like the complete lack of free will, emotion, or > creativity, for example). > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > Alex R > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > Alex R > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > Alex R > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8fb202760d80a804d22e6979 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John E Clifford= <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry, to intrude philosophy (or theology) into this, but a case c= an be made that the only actual god has no worshipers, since all have worsh= iped imperfect simulcra of it -- and always will, even though they keep try= ing to get it right.=A0 It is hard to worhsip the ineffable without effing = a bit -- and thus missing.

And that is precisely why I don't hav= e truck with philosophy. I see absolutely no point in discussing things whi= ch can not be proven one way or the other. God is unknowable in every aspec= t, number, gender, temperament, existence. There is no way for us to find o= ut anything about the true nature of (the) god(s), and so there's no po= int that I can see in bothering with trying. And like pretty much everythin= g ever thought of by philosophers, if and when we do figure out a way to ma= ke such things knowable, we'll probably find out that all the philosoph= ers were wrong.

Also, "the only actual god" sounds very Judeo-Christian. How = could possibly know whether lo cevni is singular? Maybe there's three, = or 20, or a million. The only thing we can say we know for certain is that = we don't know anything.
=A0

From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
<= span style=3D"font-weight:bold">Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32 PM
Subject:= Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni}

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alex Ro= zenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
Well, it just means that if I wanted to talk about a = god who existed whether or not ey was worshipped I'd need to use a zi&#= 39;evla or {cevni be zi'o}. A priest might call the Christian god {lo c= evni be zi'o bei roda}.

Is there a such thing as a god which does= not have worshipers? Granted, there are gods which do have worshipers /now= /, but they did at one point, and I know of no gods that have never, at any= time, had any worshipers at all.
=A0
Even if you don't like philosophy, this is still a linguistic iss= ue. In English, the Goa'uld are not gods, even though they are w= orshiped as gods; in lojban (assuming your definition as canonical, which m= akes sense) they are gods because they are worshiped as such.= *

*... to the people who worship them.

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan Jones = <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
Meh. I don't have any truck with philosophers in general.
=


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpg= lover64@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems like this would interact nicely with t= he setting of American Gods, where {lo cevni be noda} are literally = dying mostly because {noda ra cevni}.

I think some theist philosophers would disagree with your definit= ion, though; it's, in a sense, very anthropocentric; {pu ji'a sai l= o nu zasti lo remna ku la .jegvon. ze'e ca cevni fi ro da}


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan= Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
So it seems like your notion of {cevni} focuses more centr= ally on worship and dominion than on divinity.
=

No, it focus entirely on status. Their servants thought they were = gods, we know they aren't. If someone think that X is god, then to that= person, {da cevni}. If someone else does not think X is a god, or alternat= ively /knows/ that X isn't, hen to /that/ person, {da na cevni}.
=A0
On S= un, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Which is why I say misleading and not incorrect.
<= br>
Also, {la'oi Goa'uld cevni xu} by your definition (ignore = if you haven't seen Stargate SG-1)?

{.i go'i jenai go'i .i na cevni mi to fangypre po'o toi .i = cevni lo gy. remna selfu}
Yes and no. Not gods to me (just aliens), but gods to their human servants.=
=A0
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Jones <= eye= onus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Then I believe that the jbovlaste definition of {cevni} is= misleading:
  Definition: x1 is a/the god/deity of people(s)/relig=
ion x2 with dominion
       over x3 [sphere]; x1 is divine.
note the secondary definition. = I would consider angels to be divine.

= Well, then you're using a different sense of the word "divine"= ; than jbovlaste is, because the sense of "divine" in the English= definition of {cevni} is "(of or pertaining to a god): deific, godlik= e, godly", whereas you seem to be meaning "(eternal, holy): hallo= wed, holy, sacred".

On = Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
Even demons, and if you stretch the meaning = /really/ far, djinn.


On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@= gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
xu se cumki smuni lo ka ce'u ge angeli gi cevni

<= /div>{cevni} can refer to many different things, but not angels. Gods, godd= esses, demi-god(esse)s, oni, and so on and so forth.

But not angels.= Angels are not gods, they aren't even god-like. Except for maybe the a= rchangels, they're barely above humans, and in many ways are lower on t= he totem pole (like the complete lack of free will, emotion, or creativity,= for example).

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )



--
mu'o = mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi= .luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father= . :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
= mu'o mi'e .arpis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8fb202760d80a804d22e6979--