Received: from mail-gg0-f188.google.com ([209.85.161.188]:52018) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TppIc-00052W-Cq; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:55 -0800 Received: by mail-gg0-f188.google.com with SMTP id q4sf7684220ggn.15 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=FcbGJ/sBIWlUNlYFeYxJfVxSMgfNCDwU/tHvFIju7ac=; b=hTzq5yi7NDZlHEwg4sI9J/+08lz/lwhT7vjvsFcOMaeZU56b+HOnhE/MUq6DaXs0xe jo3o5SebiYCAN0jh9J9UQ3bK66TLnBN63HAAvqPgym8Ega3n9Kd0jUYulo7RvFZ41rNc qhCnXKFdNLo4Dit/Ix6HXQl/zpuA/5pfqcOXf8A84oRLnp5ttshXW5pTlhkDFZTszGd5 JdoataFrCMrjRKxlJFQDFyPWUerI0yD/mZBm+PH0PxjV7VwRccAV3xU/aV+6MAJoRlLz GnBRpNlmNo2Gi+cg6J/uZTKzA7yt7NTYZypYpbCYqos5cTQOLuKFA/QKa+P83zzkJCW7 SAkA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=FcbGJ/sBIWlUNlYFeYxJfVxSMgfNCDwU/tHvFIju7ac=; b=sWSdSlAx3I+wVU1s50f6bj5jQ0pNkIA91yFfhb8kYU38jY/21oXhemjjxaSmJAiI+m wHXG7pRC5NUTXazzZHYGX6IxbiBPrag+P+NQCAACu6gqEAwUUSm7Zj3MW/t6OPPTYqPV 3olpmgPJUuGFYuGbfOahL9TA8YRImTz4snv1U35YZxt05iikD/WnAgdBsxkxPpf8D+RQ mjjWosooaeUOl7wDYKBwlSfd8jQwLAa7+x2hLvRm2sAUEA4Rtjc4LK+RMW8Us3UFXtPq NYq2BX7tb6htIF+YMPPo3PIirELKjHOcJ3llAzGdfVIHd2LezNjQFqZNxZoLcAke8vh1 +8ew== X-Received: by 10.50.87.165 with SMTP id az5mr13742779igb.1.1356998495878; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:35 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.15.168 with SMTP id y8ls13656793igc.42.canary; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.123.142 with SMTP id s14mr24699321icr.0.1356998495335; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.123.142 with SMTP id s14mr24699314icr.0.1356998495207; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (mail-oa0-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x4si4907303igm.0.2012.12.31.16.01.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.51; Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id n12so12025494oag.38 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.42.97 with SMTP id n1mr34872234obl.91.1356998494789; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:01:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1356994322.96794.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:01:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni} From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93998eb3e1ee304d22ed5b2 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --14dae93998eb3e1ee304d22ed5b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:46 PM, .arpis. wrote: > Right. I'm not criticizing the definition, merely explicitly pointing out > notable differences from others and linguistic choices made. > > As for philosophy, someone else said it better than I can: > > > Philosophy has some amount of a problem in that whenever something > becomes rigorous enough we often stop classifying it as philosophy (math, > physics, linguistics, economics, psychology- pretty much all of these split > off from philosophy). > -- http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=735#comment-26093 > Yeah, basically all of the scientific disciplines- and the discipline of Science itself, derived from philosophy. It is my hope that at some point philosophy will cease to be simply because everything becomes explainable and knowable. > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John E Clifford wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry, to intrude philosophy (or theology) into this, but a case can be >>>> made that the only actual god has no worshipers, since all have worshiped >>>> imperfect simulcra of it -- and always will, even though they keep trying >>>> to get it right. It is hard to worhsip the ineffable without effing a bit >>>> -- and thus missing. >>>> >>> >>> And that is precisely why I don't have truck with philosophy. I see >>> absolutely no point in discussing things which can not be proven one way or >>> the other. God is unknowable in every aspect, number, gender, temperament, >>> existence. There is no way for us to find out anything about the true >>> nature of (the) god(s), and so there's no point that I can see in bothering >>> with trying. And like pretty much everything ever thought of by >>> philosophers, if and when we do figure out a way to make such things >>> knowable, we'll probably find out that all the philosophers were wrong. >>> >>> Also, "the only actual god" sounds very Judeo-Christian. How could >>> possibly know whether lo cevni is singular? Maybe there's three, or 20, or >>> a million. The only thing we can say we know for certain is that we don't >>> know anything. >>> >> >> Sorry, I forgot to state my point. >> >> When I speak of gods, I don't bother about what is actual, specifically >> because there's literally no what to know what that is. I have my own >> beliefs about the matter, of course, but I don't pretend to think that my >> beliefs are the definite truth. So, when I talk about gods, I talk about >> beings like Thor, Ra, Gaeia, Minerva, and Pluto; beings which more than >> likely do not now and never did exist, but which at some point in time- >> whether or not "now" is part of that time frame- were believed to be the >> real thing by somebody. >> >> So, my point is, I feel pretty safe in my assumption that the vast >> majority about lo cevni will be about those which are believed in, and not >> the ineffable actuality, and have no problem with forcing those who do wish >> to talk about the ineffable actuality in Lojban to use lo cevni be zi'o to >> do so. >> >> >> >>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* Jonathan Jones >>>> *To:* lojban@googlegroups.com >>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32 PM >>>> *Subject:* Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni} >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Well, it just means that if I wanted to talk about a god who existed >>>> whether or not ey was worshipped I'd need to use a zi'evla or {cevni be >>>> zi'o}. A priest might call the Christian god {lo cevni be zi'o bei roda}. >>>> >>>> >>>> Is there a such thing as a god which does not have worshipers? Granted, >>>> there are gods which do have worshipers /now/, but they did at one point, >>>> and I know of no gods that have never, at any time, had any worshipers at >>>> all. >>>> >>>> >>>> Even if you don't like philosophy, this is still a linguistic issue. In >>>> English, the Goa'uld are *not* gods, even though they are worshiped as >>>> gods; in lojban (assuming your definition as canonical, which makes sense) >>>> they *are* gods *because* they are worshiped as such.* >>>> >>>> >>>> *... to the people who worship them. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> Meh. I don't have any truck with philosophers in general. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Seems like this would interact nicely with the setting of *American >>>> Gods*, where {lo cevni be noda} are literally dying mostly because >>>> {noda ra cevni}. >>>> >>>> I think some theist philosophers would disagree with your definition, >>>> though; it's, in a sense, very anthropocentric; {pu ji'a sai lo nu zasti lo >>>> remna ku la .jegvon. ze'e ca cevni fi ro da} >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> So it seems like your notion of {cevni} focuses more centrally on >>>> worship and dominion than on divinity. >>>> >>>> >>>> No, it focus entirely on status. Their servants thought they were gods, >>>> we know they aren't. If someone think that X is god, then to that person, >>>> {da cevni}. If someone else does not think X is a god, or alternatively >>>> /knows/ that X isn't, hen to /that/ person, {da na cevni}. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, .arpis. wrote: >>>> >>>> Which is why I say misleading and not incorrect. >>>> >>>> Also, {la'oi Goa'uld cevni xu} by your definition (ignore if you >>>> haven't seen Stargate SG-1)? >>>> >>>> >>>> {.i go'i jenai go'i .i na cevni mi to fangypre po'o toi .i cevni lo gy. >>>> remna selfu} >>>> Yes and no. Not gods to me (just aliens), but gods to their human >>>> servants. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, .arpis. wrote: >>>> >>>> Then I believe that the jbovlaste definition of {cevni} is misleading: >>>> >>>> Definition: x1 is a/the god/deity of people(s)/religion x2 with dominion >>>> over x3 [sphere]; x1 is divine. >>>> >>>> note the secondary definition. I would consider angels to be divine. >>>> >>>> >>>> Well, then you're using a different sense of the word "divine" than >>>> jbovlaste is, because the sense of "divine" in the English definition of >>>> {cevni} is "(of or pertaining to a god): deific, godlike, godly", whereas >>>> you seem to be meaning "(eternal, holy): hallowed, holy, sacred". >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> Even demons, and if you stretch the meaning /really/ far, djinn. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, .arpis. wrote: >>>> >>>> xu se cumki smuni lo ka ce'u ge angeli gi cevni >>>> >>>> >>>> {cevni} can refer to many different things, but not angels. Gods, >>>> goddesses, demi-god(esse)s, oni, and so on and so forth. >>>> >>>> But not angels. Angels are not gods, they aren't even god-like. Except >>>> for maybe the archangels, they're barely above humans, and in many ways are >>>> lower on the totem pole (like the complete lack of free will, emotion, or >>>> creativity, for example). >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .arpis. >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .arpis. >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex R >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex R >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex R >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --14dae93998eb3e1ee304d22ed5b2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:46 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Right. I'm not criticizing the definition, merely= explicitly pointing out notable differences from others and linguistic cho= ices made.

As for philosophy, someone else said it better than= I can:

> Philosophy has some amount of a problem in that whenever somethin= g=20 becomes rigorous enough we often stop classifying it as philosophy=20 (math, physics, linguistics, economics, psychology- pretty much all of=20 these split off from philosophy).
=A0 -- http://www.scottaar= onson.com/blog/?p=3D735#comment-26093

Ye= ah, basically all of the scientific disciplines- and the discipline of Scie= nce itself, derived from philosophy. It is my hope that at some point philo= sophy will cease to be simply because everything becomes explainable and kn= owable.
=A0
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>= wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan J= ones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John E Cli= fford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry, to intrude philosophy (or theology) into this, but a case c= an be made that the only actual god has no worshipers, since all have worsh= iped imperfect simulcra of it -- and always will, even though they keep try= ing to get it right.=A0 It is hard to worhsip the ineffable without effing = a bit -- and thus missing.

And that is precisely why I don'= ;t have truck with philosophy. I see absolutely no point in discussing thin= gs which can not be proven one way or the other. God is unknowable in every= aspect, number, gender, temperament, existence. There is no way for us to = find out anything about the true nature of (the) god(s), and so there's= no point that I can see in bothering with trying. And like pretty much eve= rything ever thought of by philosophers, if and when we do figure out a way= to make such things knowable, we'll probably find out that all the phi= losophers were wrong.

Also, "the only actual god" sounds very Judeo-Christian. How = could possibly know whether lo cevni is singular? Maybe there's three, = or 20, or a million. The only thing we can say we know for certain is that = we don't know anything.

Sorry, I forgot to state my point.<= br>
When I speak of gods, I don't bother about what is actual, speci= fically because there's literally no what to know what that is. I have = my own beliefs about the matter, of course, but I don't pretend to thin= k that my beliefs are the definite truth. So, when I talk about gods, I tal= k about beings like Thor, Ra, Gaeia, Minerva, and Pluto; beings which more = than likely do not now and never did exist, but which at some point in time= - whether or not "now" is part of that time frame- were believed = to be the real thing by somebody.

So, my point is, I feel pretty safe in my assumption that the vast majo= rity about lo cevni will be about those which are believed in, and not the = ineffable actuality, and have no problem with forcing those who do wish to = talk about the ineffable actuality in Lojban to use lo cevni be zi'o to= do so.

=A0

From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
<= span style=3D"font-weight:bold">Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32 PM
Subject:= Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni}

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, it just means that if I wanted to talk about a = god who existed whether or not ey was worshipped I'd need to use a zi&#= 39;evla or {cevni be zi'o}. A priest might call the Christian god {lo c= evni be zi'o bei roda}.

Is there a such thing as a god which does= not have worshipers? Granted, there are gods which do have worshipers /now= /, but they did at one point, and I know of no gods that have never, at any= time, had any worshipers at all.
=A0
Even if you don't like philosophy, this is still a linguistic iss= ue. In English, the Goa'uld are not gods, even though they are w= orshiped as gods; in lojban (assuming your definition as canonical, which m= akes sense) they are gods because they are worshiped as such.= *

*... to the people who worship them.

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan Jones = <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
Meh. I don't have any truck with philosophers in general.
=


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpg= lover64@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems like this would interact nicely with t= he setting of American Gods, where {lo cevni be noda} are literally = dying mostly because {noda ra cevni}.

I think some theist philosophers would disagree with your definit= ion, though; it's, in a sense, very anthropocentric; {pu ji'a sai l= o nu zasti lo remna ku la .jegvon. ze'e ca cevni fi ro da}


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan= Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
So it seems like your notion of {cevni} focuses more centr= ally on worship and dominion than on divinity.
=

No, it focus entirely on status. Their servants thought they were = gods, we know they aren't. If someone think that X is god, then to that= person, {da cevni}. If someone else does not think X is a god, or alternat= ively /knows/ that X isn't, hen to /that/ person, {da na cevni}.
=A0
On S= un, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Which is why I say misleading and not incorrect.
<= br>
Also, {la'oi Goa'uld cevni xu} by your definition (ignore = if you haven't seen Stargate SG-1)?

{.i go'i jenai go'i .i na cevni mi to fangypre po'o toi .i = cevni lo gy. remna selfu}
Yes and no. Not gods to me (just aliens), but gods to their human servants.=
=A0
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Jones <= eye= onus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Then I believe that the jbovlaste definition of {cevni} is= misleading:
  Definition: x1 is a/the god/deity of people(s)/relig=
ion x2 with dominion
       over x3 [sphere]; x1 is divine.
note the secondary definition. = I would consider angels to be divine.

= Well, then you're using a different sense of the word "divine"= ; than jbovlaste is, because the sense of "divine" in the English= definition of {cevni} is "(of or pertaining to a god): deific, godlik= e, godly", whereas you seem to be meaning "(eternal, holy): hallo= wed, holy, sacred".

On = Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
Even demons, and if you stretch the meaning = /really/ far, djinn.


On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@= gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
xu se cumki smuni lo ka ce'u ge angeli gi cevni

<= /div>{cevni} can refer to many different things, but not angels. Gods, godd= esses, demi-god(esse)s, oni, and so on and so forth.

But not angels.= Angels are not gods, they aren't even god-like. Except for maybe the a= rchangels, they're barely above humans, and in many ways are lower on t= he totem pole (like the complete lack of free will, emotion, or creativity,= for example).

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )



--
mu'o = mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi= .luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father= . :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
= mu'o mi'e .arpis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--14dae93998eb3e1ee304d22ed5b2--