Received: from mail-oa0-f58.google.com ([209.85.219.58]:57990) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpqp3-0005DC-Qe; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:27 -0800 Received: by mail-oa0-f58.google.com with SMTP id l10sf7711635oag.23 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=q7+o6Ekv5IVUfIciwwN2efiOeYNX5AipINTXOeG0A/A=; b=sDG7Ox9B8z7IxSGweCHIpcs+D2+hs+UULloIdPV9FYSNfT/dgfacu+i7GgtbACKciy FMxxpNMw2/8dLggppdPS5UKIqjFSqPBYeggEvGTuhXbPChmRMfE9v+IYHPwWfO8HDmAR rrdRObq/zliBGv6aNM8QDBvrXu/heYHHib4JhFd+7fiyemVtXDWzxNV7F2ZqigKdjvrx vHCDe8zutkRr0FuDYHkgO/JJVNG3OZKb9hhEDY/xCzjqLCwZJX53kSLWAWAegHr/vZoh 5NprurO0KTrwDFrXsLyluJ4qSebyj2g21sNIKbn6A18wZgpE9a3b0JSpHmTG4DGvb5l+ ncRg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=q7+o6Ekv5IVUfIciwwN2efiOeYNX5AipINTXOeG0A/A=; b=qS7ylqgmc5b2/VpsolWTvDwM8Z1tpxThFDB0FlVxgMJ77PHjsJZRjqCczdUrPgLKrw f9eja2rcaGeQGykhX38ly1tG9cNjCvungGFucBkjRh41hx0xin7wGpQ1am//XKwVLPx5 PclBLKdz+3xfSwYqmAi1PU/P56qrpA0lm/5GQiuGZIWqVR9vv/cxrBszEjQuten8uv2c wkObMNINJhzkjZ8Vwo4nt1oJzTCoCHdDSCYT6PakC2v3SzOGOnf/kIEhORpxOxu3c2Qg 6rxh+kyf8oQKKxuWwjKIw5MOfDZyV/9qeDnq15oZ1GO8oykh2s1eQ1gcNz4kR2PkR+ka RB2w== X-Received: by 10.50.154.132 with SMTP id vo4mr13600056igb.7.1357004351388; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:11 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.13.134 with SMTP id h6ls8214316igc.43.canary; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.34.164 with SMTP id a4mr33930547igj.7.1357004350687; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.34.164 with SMTP id a4mr33930544igj.7.1357004350645; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ge7si3844529igb.0.2012.12.31.17.39.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.172; Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id za17so12007829obc.31 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.21.135 with SMTP id v7mr35851656obe.101.1357004350234; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:39:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1356994322.96794.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:39:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni} From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93b6374411f0f04d2303212 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --14dae93b6374411f0f04d2303212 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > {.i ku'i mi krici lo du'u ze'e ba ku da na te djuno} > By contrast, I think that there will always be something unknown. > {.i go'i .i ku'i zo.a'o na lacri zo.ia .i.uenai ma'a noroi cilre roda rode .iku'i na.a'o go'i} Agreed, but hope is not dependent on belief. I expect we will never learn everything, but I hope we do. > ra'u nai, is there an afterthought construct that will let me put two full > bridi in one abstraction? {.i bo} doesn't seem to do it, and {ju'e} and > {gi'e} both do bridi tails. > I don't think so. You can't use anything with .i, because the .i kills everything and starts a new main level bridi. There's GA...gi..., but that's forethought, and I don't think there's an afterthought equivalent. I could be wrong, of course, but I'm not aware of anything. > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:46 PM, .arpis. wrote: >> >>> Right. I'm not criticizing the definition, merely explicitly pointing >>> out notable differences from others and linguistic choices made. >>> >>> As for philosophy, someone else said it better than I can: >>> >>> > Philosophy has some amount of a problem in that whenever something >>> becomes rigorous enough we often stop classifying it as philosophy (math, >>> physics, linguistics, economics, psychology- pretty much all of these split >>> off from philosophy). >>> -- http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=735#comment-26093 >>> >> >> Yeah, basically all of the scientific disciplines- and the discipline of >> Science itself, derived from philosophy. It is my hope that at some point >> philosophy will cease to be simply because everything becomes explainable >> and knowable. >> >> >>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John E Clifford >>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, to intrude philosophy (or theology) into this, but a case can >>>>>> be made that the only actual god has no worshipers, since all have >>>>>> worshiped imperfect simulcra of it -- and always will, even though they >>>>>> keep trying to get it right. It is hard to worhsip the ineffable without >>>>>> effing a bit -- and thus missing. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And that is precisely why I don't have truck with philosophy. I see >>>>> absolutely no point in discussing things which can not be proven one way or >>>>> the other. God is unknowable in every aspect, number, gender, temperament, >>>>> existence. There is no way for us to find out anything about the true >>>>> nature of (the) god(s), and so there's no point that I can see in bothering >>>>> with trying. And like pretty much everything ever thought of by >>>>> philosophers, if and when we do figure out a way to make such things >>>>> knowable, we'll probably find out that all the philosophers were wrong. >>>>> >>>>> Also, "the only actual god" sounds very Judeo-Christian. How could >>>>> possibly know whether lo cevni is singular? Maybe there's three, or 20, or >>>>> a million. The only thing we can say we know for certain is that we don't >>>>> know anything. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry, I forgot to state my point. >>>> >>>> When I speak of gods, I don't bother about what is actual, specifically >>>> because there's literally no what to know what that is. I have my own >>>> beliefs about the matter, of course, but I don't pretend to think that my >>>> beliefs are the definite truth. So, when I talk about gods, I talk about >>>> beings like Thor, Ra, Gaeia, Minerva, and Pluto; beings which more than >>>> likely do not now and never did exist, but which at some point in time- >>>> whether or not "now" is part of that time frame- were believed to be the >>>> real thing by somebody. >>>> >>>> So, my point is, I feel pretty safe in my assumption that the vast >>>> majority about lo cevni will be about those which are believed in, and not >>>> the ineffable actuality, and have no problem with forcing those who do wish >>>> to talk about the ineffable actuality in Lojban to use lo cevni be zi'o to >>>> do so. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> *From:* Jonathan Jones >>>>>> *To:* lojban@googlegroups.com >>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32 PM >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni} >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn < >>>>>> rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, it just means that if I wanted to talk about a god who existed >>>>>> whether or not ey was worshipped I'd need to use a zi'evla or {cevni be >>>>>> zi'o}. A priest might call the Christian god {lo cevni be zi'o bei roda}. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a such thing as a god which does not have worshipers? >>>>>> Granted, there are gods which do have worshipers /now/, but they did at one >>>>>> point, and I know of no gods that have never, at any time, had any >>>>>> worshipers at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Even if you don't like philosophy, this is still a linguistic issue. >>>>>> In English, the Goa'uld are *not* gods, even though they are >>>>>> worshiped as gods; in lojban (assuming your definition as canonical, which >>>>>> makes sense) they *are* gods *because* they are worshiped as such.* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *... to the people who worship them. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Meh. I don't have any truck with philosophers in general. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn < >>>>>> rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Seems like this would interact nicely with the setting of *American >>>>>> Gods*, where {lo cevni be noda} are literally dying mostly because >>>>>> {noda ra cevni}. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think some theist philosophers would disagree with your definition, >>>>>> though; it's, in a sense, very anthropocentric; {pu ji'a sai lo nu zasti lo >>>>>> remna ku la .jegvon. ze'e ca cevni fi ro da} >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn < >>>>>> rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So it seems like your notion of {cevni} focuses more centrally on >>>>>> worship and dominion than on divinity. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No, it focus entirely on status. Their servants thought they were >>>>>> gods, we know they aren't. If someone think that X is god, then to that >>>>>> person, {da cevni}. If someone else does not think X is a god, or >>>>>> alternatively /knows/ that X isn't, hen to /that/ person, {da na cevni}. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, .arpis. >>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Which is why I say misleading and not incorrect. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, {la'oi Goa'uld cevni xu} by your definition (ignore if you >>>>>> haven't seen Stargate SG-1)? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> {.i go'i jenai go'i .i na cevni mi to fangypre po'o toi .i cevni lo >>>>>> gy. remna selfu} >>>>>> Yes and no. Not gods to me (just aliens), but gods to their human >>>>>> servants. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, .arpis. >>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Then I believe that the jbovlaste definition of {cevni} is misleading: >>>>>> >>>>>> Definition: x1 is a/the god/deity of people(s)/religion x2 with dominion >>>>>> over x3 [sphere]; x1 is divine. >>>>>> >>>>>> note the secondary definition. I would consider angels to be divine. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, then you're using a different sense of the word "divine" than >>>>>> jbovlaste is, because the sense of "divine" in the English definition of >>>>>> {cevni} is "(of or pertaining to a god): deific, godlike, godly", whereas >>>>>> you seem to be meaning "(eternal, holy): hallowed, holy, sacred". >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Even demons, and if you stretch the meaning /really/ far, djinn. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, .arpis. >>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> xu se cumki smuni lo ka ce'u ge angeli gi cevni >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> {cevni} can refer to many different things, but not angels. Gods, >>>>>> goddesses, demi-god(esse)s, oni, and so on and so forth. >>>>>> >>>>>> But not angels. Angels are not gods, they aren't even god-like. >>>>>> Except for maybe the archangels, they're barely above humans, and in many >>>>>> ways are lower on the totem pole (like the complete lack of free will, >>>>>> emotion, or creativity, for example). >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .arpis. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .arpis. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alex R >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alex R >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alex R >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>> >>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .arpis. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "lojban" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Alex R > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --14dae93b6374411f0f04d2303212 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Alex Rozenshtey= n <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
{.i ku'i mi krici lo du'u ze'e ba ku= da na te djuno}
By contrast, I think that there will always be so= mething unknown.

{.i go'i .i ku= 9;i zo.a'o na lacri zo.ia .i.uenai ma'a noroi cilre roda rode .iku&= #39;i na.a'o go'i}
Agreed, but hope is not dependent on belief. I expect we will never learn e= verything, but I hope we do.
=A0
ra'u nai, is there an afterthought construct that will let m= e put two full bridi in one abstraction? {.i bo} doesn't seem to do it,= and {ju'e} and {gi'e} both do bridi tails.

I don't think so. You can't use anything with .i, because = the .i kills everything and starts a new main level bridi. There's GA..= .gi..., but that's forethought, and I don't think there's an af= terthought equivalent. I could be wrong, of course, but I'm not aware o= f anything.
=A0
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Jones <= eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec = 31, 2012 at 4:46 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
Right. I'm not criticizing the definition, merely= explicitly pointing out notable differences from others and linguistic cho= ices made.

As for philosophy, someone else said it better than= I can:

> Philosophy has some amount of a problem in that whenever somethin= g=20 becomes rigorous enough we often stop classifying it as philosophy=20 (math, physics, linguistics, economics, psychology- pretty much all of=20 these split off from philosophy).
=A0 -- http://www.scottaar= onson.com/blog/?p=3D735#comment-26093
=
Yeah, basically all of the scientific disciplines- and the discipline o= f Science itself, derived from philosophy. It is my hope that at some point= philosophy will cease to be simply because everything becomes explainable = and knowable.
=A0
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>= wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan J= ones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John E Cli= fford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry, to intrude philosophy (or theology) into this, but a case c= an be made that the only actual god has no worshipers, since all have worsh= iped imperfect simulcra of it -- and always will, even though they keep try= ing to get it right.=A0 It is hard to worhsip the ineffable without effing = a bit -- and thus missing.

And that is precisely why I don'= ;t have truck with philosophy. I see absolutely no point in discussing thin= gs which can not be proven one way or the other. God is unknowable in every= aspect, number, gender, temperament, existence. There is no way for us to = find out anything about the true nature of (the) god(s), and so there's= no point that I can see in bothering with trying. And like pretty much eve= rything ever thought of by philosophers, if and when we do figure out a way= to make such things knowable, we'll probably find out that all the phi= losophers were wrong.

Also, "the only actual god" sounds very Judeo-Christian. How = could possibly know whether lo cevni is singular? Maybe there's three, = or 20, or a million. The only thing we can say we know for certain is that = we don't know anything.

Sorry, I forgot to state my point.<= br>
When I speak of gods, I don't bother about what is actual, speci= fically because there's literally no what to know what that is. I have = my own beliefs about the matter, of course, but I don't pretend to thin= k that my beliefs are the definite truth. So, when I talk about gods, I tal= k about beings like Thor, Ra, Gaeia, Minerva, and Pluto; beings which more = than likely do not now and never did exist, but which at some point in time= - whether or not "now" is part of that time frame- were believed = to be the real thing by somebody.

So, my point is, I feel pretty safe in my assumption that the vast majo= rity about lo cevni will be about those which are believed in, and not the = ineffable actuality, and have no problem with forcing those who do wish to = talk about the ineffable actuality in Lojban to use lo cevni be zi'o to= do so.

=A0

From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
<= span style=3D"font-weight:bold">Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32 PM
Subject:= Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni}

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, it just means that if I wanted to talk about a = god who existed whether or not ey was worshipped I'd need to use a zi&#= 39;evla or {cevni be zi'o}. A priest might call the Christian god {lo c= evni be zi'o bei roda}.

Is there a such thing as a god which does= not have worshipers? Granted, there are gods which do have worshipers /now= /, but they did at one point, and I know of no gods that have never, at any= time, had any worshipers at all.
=A0
Even if you don't like philosophy, this is still a linguistic iss= ue. In English, the Goa'uld are not gods, even though they are w= orshiped as gods; in lojban (assuming your definition as canonical, which m= akes sense) they are gods because they are worshiped as such.= *

*... to the people who worship them.

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan Jones = <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
Meh. I don't have any truck with philosophers in general.
=


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpg= lover64@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems like this would interact nicely with t= he setting of American Gods, where {lo cevni be noda} are literally = dying mostly because {noda ra cevni}.

I think some theist philosophers would disagree with your definit= ion, though; it's, in a sense, very anthropocentric; {pu ji'a sai l= o nu zasti lo remna ku la .jegvon. ze'e ca cevni fi ro da}


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan= Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
So it seems like your notion of {cevni} focuses more centr= ally on worship and dominion than on divinity.
=

No, it focus entirely on status. Their servants thought they were = gods, we know they aren't. If someone think that X is god, then to that= person, {da cevni}. If someone else does not think X is a god, or alternat= ively /knows/ that X isn't, hen to /that/ person, {da na cevni}.
=A0
On S= un, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Which is why I say misleading and not incorrect.
<= br>
Also, {la'oi Goa'uld cevni xu} by your definition (ignore = if you haven't seen Stargate SG-1)?

{.i go'i jenai go'i .i na cevni mi to fangypre po'o toi .i = cevni lo gy. remna selfu}
Yes and no. Not gods to me (just aliens), but gods to their human servants.=
=A0
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Jones <= eye= onus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Then I believe that the jbovlaste definition of {cevni} is= misleading:
  Definition: x1 is a/the god/deity of people(s)/relig=
ion x2 with dominion
       over x3 [sphere]; x1 is divine.
note the secondary definition. = I would consider angels to be divine.

= Well, then you're using a different sense of the word "divine"= ; than jbovlaste is, because the sense of "divine" in the English= definition of {cevni} is "(of or pertaining to a god): deific, godlik= e, godly", whereas you seem to be meaning "(eternal, holy): hallo= wed, holy, sacred".

On = Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
Even demons, and if you stretch the meaning = /really/ far, djinn.


On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@= gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
xu se cumki smuni lo ka ce'u ge angeli gi cevni

<= /div>{cevni} can refer to many different things, but not angels. Gods, godd= esses, demi-god(esse)s, oni, and so on and so forth.

But not angels.= Angels are not gods, they aren't even god-like. Except for maybe the a= rchangels, they're barely above humans, and in many ways are lower on t= he totem pole (like the complete lack of free will, emotion, or creativity,= for example).

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )



--
mu'o = mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi= .luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father= . :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
= mu'o mi'e .arpis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--14dae93b6374411f0f04d2303212--