Received: from mail-da0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:33954) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TpqrV-0005EM-7i; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:58 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f61.google.com with SMTP id z8sf8033313dad.16 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=kIqUoZALIyhk02K5gsgFYQGNyUl3ow99d1xrVCEl6fo=; b=nR+c+SCMd19ZHmihEKH0Ke+XnDudUpSlWf5TP40xUY92VrBOsQtD5Z9egTyXHNVRbb 6wK8thSNIMr/IcZ382X/zkpd5jzu7MLzSGGFn0e/W2LagiVemDsUgybGoY/PlegDwt9y 6c6rFFUiqeplQQvFOn6pIdJQ05u/obL1xxCwMWyKWSu1esQMt1+DTGJ2kZdJFw+P/Xkj LXsnEhGN2JHCUKQNf+GOHOce+0zyufG3TluGF9RVPUvQ/vzFTLE+Wqbyj/EfdGolem8g 4ieIldzLHnqypUOQzeJDNpvTh7sxNmhAvmykeaaPHzf5wlVND+mvrWVW44b8K/I1Sk0E eWaA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=kIqUoZALIyhk02K5gsgFYQGNyUl3ow99d1xrVCEl6fo=; b=JFm8N5c3y0N8KyYlM6pVSj2bMHXLaotAH22/1PIPVn4REw0kDxeVc9Tig0qJovvO1Z molUZAF6wrwmntqaLsyUGQfZU/jQJkt7+BEe+asa3hBS3Rb3/lA027R+E8sOLnk6LBwF E4LdVzvyG4CoVGn+eBC2fxpJMXbDENXZJZqtjuQKHDSLkWFyg9BAGfrMjdbLr6+WKpy/ KbPVodfIsgkbgzkxOdkFcJS5NRsCsAMpIDsOdpmzpJTMcBmLTpllHGRo1CpsUR/wN1Jb dEL1itT6gBaDRpEnPJqNPlRv0wbujAqM1qhtHcr/r23RoFB7tK9oEcCCbi/pDsH+nmcQ VexQ== X-Received: by 10.50.0.204 with SMTP id 12mr13630734igg.9.1357004502934; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:42 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.17.201 with SMTP id q9ls13801940igd.26.canary; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.0.148 with SMTP id 20mr37545381ige.3.1357004502426; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.0.148 with SMTP id 20mr37545379ige.3.1357004502390; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o7si4535032igl.0.2012.12.31.17.41.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178; Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id eh20so12024519obb.9 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.212.2 with SMTP id ng2mr34835020obc.81.1357004501995; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:41:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1356994322.96794.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:41:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni} From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f6438f24cd0a204d2303bd6 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f6438f24cd0a204d2303bd6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > >> {.i ku'i mi krici lo du'u ze'e ba ku da na te djuno} >> By contrast, I think that there will always be something unknown. >> > > {.i go'i .i ku'i zo.a'o na lacri zo.ia .i.uenai ma'a noroi cilre roda rode > .iku'i na.a'o go'i} > Agreed, but hope is not dependent on belief. I expect we will never learn > everything, but I hope we do. > And I just realized that technically, that should've been {la'e zo.a'o} and {la'e zo.ia}.... ra'u nai, is there an afterthought construct that will let me put two full >> bridi in one abstraction? {.i bo} doesn't seem to do it, and {ju'e} and >> {gi'e} both do bridi tails. >> > > I don't think so. You can't use anything with .i, because the .i kills > everything and starts a new main level bridi. There's GA...gi..., but > that's forethought, and I don't think there's an afterthought equivalent. I > could be wrong, of course, but I'm not aware of anything. > > >> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:46 PM, .arpis. wrote: >>> >>>> Right. I'm not criticizing the definition, merely explicitly pointing >>>> out notable differences from others and linguistic choices made. >>>> >>>> As for philosophy, someone else said it better than I can: >>>> >>>> > Philosophy has some amount of a problem in that whenever something >>>> becomes rigorous enough we often stop classifying it as philosophy (math, >>>> physics, linguistics, economics, psychology- pretty much all of these split >>>> off from philosophy). >>>> -- http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=735#comment-26093 >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, basically all of the scientific disciplines- and the discipline of >>> Science itself, derived from philosophy. It is my hope that at some point >>> philosophy will cease to be simply because everything becomes explainable >>> and knowable. >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John E Clifford < >>>>>> kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, to intrude philosophy (or theology) into this, but a case can >>>>>>> be made that the only actual god has no worshipers, since all have >>>>>>> worshiped imperfect simulcra of it -- and always will, even though they >>>>>>> keep trying to get it right. It is hard to worhsip the ineffable without >>>>>>> effing a bit -- and thus missing. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And that is precisely why I don't have truck with philosophy. I see >>>>>> absolutely no point in discussing things which can not be proven one way or >>>>>> the other. God is unknowable in every aspect, number, gender, temperament, >>>>>> existence. There is no way for us to find out anything about the true >>>>>> nature of (the) god(s), and so there's no point that I can see in bothering >>>>>> with trying. And like pretty much everything ever thought of by >>>>>> philosophers, if and when we do figure out a way to make such things >>>>>> knowable, we'll probably find out that all the philosophers were wrong. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, "the only actual god" sounds very Judeo-Christian. How could >>>>>> possibly know whether lo cevni is singular? Maybe there's three, or 20, or >>>>>> a million. The only thing we can say we know for certain is that we don't >>>>>> know anything. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, I forgot to state my point. >>>>> >>>>> When I speak of gods, I don't bother about what is actual, >>>>> specifically because there's literally no what to know what that is. I have >>>>> my own beliefs about the matter, of course, but I don't pretend to think >>>>> that my beliefs are the definite truth. So, when I talk about gods, I talk >>>>> about beings like Thor, Ra, Gaeia, Minerva, and Pluto; beings which more >>>>> than likely do not now and never did exist, but which at some point in >>>>> time- whether or not "now" is part of that time frame- were believed to be >>>>> the real thing by somebody. >>>>> >>>>> So, my point is, I feel pretty safe in my assumption that the vast >>>>> majority about lo cevni will be about those which are believed in, and not >>>>> the ineffable actuality, and have no problem with forcing those who do wish >>>>> to talk about the ineffable actuality in Lojban to use lo cevni be zi'o to >>>>> do so. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> *From:* Jonathan Jones >>>>>>> *To:* lojban@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32 PM >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni} >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn < >>>>>>> rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, it just means that if I wanted to talk about a god who existed >>>>>>> whether or not ey was worshipped I'd need to use a zi'evla or {cevni be >>>>>>> zi'o}. A priest might call the Christian god {lo cevni be zi'o bei roda}. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a such thing as a god which does not have worshipers? >>>>>>> Granted, there are gods which do have worshipers /now/, but they did at one >>>>>>> point, and I know of no gods that have never, at any time, had any >>>>>>> worshipers at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Even if you don't like philosophy, this is still a linguistic issue. >>>>>>> In English, the Goa'uld are *not* gods, even though they are >>>>>>> worshiped as gods; in lojban (assuming your definition as canonical, which >>>>>>> makes sense) they *are* gods *because* they are worshiped as such.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *... to the people who worship them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Meh. I don't have any truck with philosophers in general. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn < >>>>>>> rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Seems like this would interact nicely with the setting of *American >>>>>>> Gods*, where {lo cevni be noda} are literally dying mostly because >>>>>>> {noda ra cevni}. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think some theist philosophers would disagree with your >>>>>>> definition, though; it's, in a sense, very anthropocentric; {pu ji'a sai lo >>>>>>> nu zasti lo remna ku la .jegvon. ze'e ca cevni fi ro da} >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn < >>>>>>> rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So it seems like your notion of {cevni} focuses more centrally on >>>>>>> worship and dominion than on divinity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, it focus entirely on status. Their servants thought they were >>>>>>> gods, we know they aren't. If someone think that X is god, then to that >>>>>>> person, {da cevni}. If someone else does not think X is a god, or >>>>>>> alternatively /knows/ that X isn't, hen to /that/ person, {da na cevni}. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, .arpis. < >>>>>>> rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which is why I say misleading and not incorrect. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, {la'oi Goa'uld cevni xu} by your definition (ignore if you >>>>>>> haven't seen Stargate SG-1)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> {.i go'i jenai go'i .i na cevni mi to fangypre po'o toi .i cevni lo >>>>>>> gy. remna selfu} >>>>>>> Yes and no. Not gods to me (just aliens), but gods to their human >>>>>>> servants. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, .arpis. < >>>>>>> rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then I believe that the jbovlaste definition of {cevni} is >>>>>>> misleading: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Definition: x1 is a/the god/deity of people(s)/religion x2 with dominion >>>>>>> over x3 [sphere]; x1 is divine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> note the secondary definition. I would consider angels to be divine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, then you're using a different sense of the word "divine" than >>>>>>> jbovlaste is, because the sense of "divine" in the English definition of >>>>>>> {cevni} is "(of or pertaining to a god): deific, godlike, godly", whereas >>>>>>> you seem to be meaning "(eternal, holy): hallowed, holy, sacred". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Even demons, and if you stretch the meaning /really/ far, djinn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, .arpis. < >>>>>>> rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> xu se cumki smuni lo ka ce'u ge angeli gi cevni >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> {cevni} can refer to many different things, but not angels. Gods, >>>>>>> goddesses, demi-god(esse)s, oni, and so on and so forth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But not angels. Angels are not gods, they aren't even god-like. >>>>>>> Except for maybe the archangels, they're barely above humans, and in many >>>>>>> ways are lower on the totem pole (like the complete lack of free will, >>>>>>> emotion, or creativity, for example). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .arpis. >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .arpis. >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alex R >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alex R >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alex R >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>> >>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>> >>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .arpis. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "lojban" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Alex R >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8f6438f24cd0a204d2303bd6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Jonatha= n Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:26 P= M, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
{.i ku'i mi krici lo du'u ze'e ba ku= da na te djuno}
By contrast, I think that there will always be so= mething unknown.

{.i go'i .i= ku'i zo.a'o na lacri zo.ia .i.uenai ma'a noroi cilre roda rode= .iku'i na.a'o go'i}
Agreed, but hope is not dependent on belief. I expect we will never learn e= verything, but I hope we do.

And I jus= t realized that technically, that should've been {la'e zo.a'o} = and {la'e zo.ia}....

ra'u nai, is there an afterthought construct that will let m= e put two full bridi in one abstraction? {.i bo} doesn't seem to do it,= and {ju'e} and {gi'e} both do bridi tails.

I don't think so. You can't use anything with .i, be= cause the .i kills everything and starts a new main level bridi. There'= s GA...gi..., but that's forethought, and I don't think there's= an afterthought equivalent. I could be wrong, of course, but I'm not a= ware of anything.
=A0
On Mo= n, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec = 31, 2012 at 4:46 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
Right. I'm not criticizing the definition, merely= explicitly pointing out notable differences from others and linguistic cho= ices made.

As for philosophy, someone else said it better than= I can:

> Philosophy has some amount of a problem in that whenever somethin= g=20 becomes rigorous enough we often stop classifying it as philosophy=20 (math, physics, linguistics, economics, psychology- pretty much all of=20 these split off from philosophy).
=A0 -- http://www.scottaar= onson.com/blog/?p=3D735#comment-26093
=
Yeah, basically all of the scientific disciplines- and the discipline o= f Science itself, derived from philosophy. It is my hope that at some point= philosophy will cease to be simply because everything becomes explainable = and knowable.
=A0
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>= wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan J= ones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John E Cli= fford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry, to intrude philosophy (or theology) into this, but a case c= an be made that the only actual god has no worshipers, since all have worsh= iped imperfect simulcra of it -- and always will, even though they keep try= ing to get it right.=A0 It is hard to worhsip the ineffable without effing = a bit -- and thus missing.

And that is precisely why I don'= ;t have truck with philosophy. I see absolutely no point in discussing thin= gs which can not be proven one way or the other. God is unknowable in every= aspect, number, gender, temperament, existence. There is no way for us to = find out anything about the true nature of (the) god(s), and so there's= no point that I can see in bothering with trying. And like pretty much eve= rything ever thought of by philosophers, if and when we do figure out a way= to make such things knowable, we'll probably find out that all the phi= losophers were wrong.

Also, "the only actual god" sounds very Judeo-Christian. How = could possibly know whether lo cevni is singular? Maybe there's three, = or 20, or a million. The only thing we can say we know for certain is that = we don't know anything.

Sorry, I forgot to state my point.<= br>
When I speak of gods, I don't bother about what is actual, speci= fically because there's literally no what to know what that is. I have = my own beliefs about the matter, of course, but I don't pretend to thin= k that my beliefs are the definite truth. So, when I talk about gods, I tal= k about beings like Thor, Ra, Gaeia, Minerva, and Pluto; beings which more = than likely do not now and never did exist, but which at some point in time= - whether or not "now" is part of that time frame- were believed = to be the real thing by somebody.

So, my point is, I feel pretty safe in my assumption that the vast majo= rity about lo cevni will be about those which are believed in, and not the = ineffable actuality, and have no problem with forcing those who do wish to = talk about the ineffable actuality in Lojban to use lo cevni be zi'o to= do so.

=A0

From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
<= span style=3D"font-weight:bold">Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:32 PM
Subject:= Re: [lojban] Secondary meaning of {cevni}

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, it just means that if I wanted to talk about a = god who existed whether or not ey was worshipped I'd need to use a zi&#= 39;evla or {cevni be zi'o}. A priest might call the Christian god {lo c= evni be zi'o bei roda}.

Is there a such thing as a god which does= not have worshipers? Granted, there are gods which do have worshipers /now= /, but they did at one point, and I know of no gods that have never, at any= time, had any worshipers at all.
=A0
Even if you don't like philosophy, this is still a linguistic iss= ue. In English, the Goa'uld are not gods, even though they are w= orshiped as gods; in lojban (assuming your definition as canonical, which m= akes sense) they are gods because they are worshiped as such.= *

*... to the people who worship them.

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan Jones = <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
Meh. I don't have any truck with philosophers in general.
=


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpg= lover64@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems like this would interact nicely with t= he setting of American Gods, where {lo cevni be noda} are literally = dying mostly because {noda ra cevni}.

I think some theist philosophers would disagree with your definit= ion, though; it's, in a sense, very anthropocentric; {pu ji'a sai l= o nu zasti lo remna ku la .jegvon. ze'e ca cevni fi ro da}


On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan= Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@gmail.com> wrote:
So it seems like your notion of {cevni} focuses more centr= ally on worship and dominion than on divinity.
=

No, it focus entirely on status. Their servants thought they were = gods, we know they aren't. If someone think that X is god, then to that= person, {da cevni}. If someone else does not think X is a god, or alternat= ively /knows/ that X isn't, hen to /that/ person, {da na cevni}.
=A0
On S= un, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:24 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Which is why I say misleading and not incorrect.
<= br>
Also, {la'oi Goa'uld cevni xu} by your definition (ignore = if you haven't seen Stargate SG-1)?

{.i go'i jenai go'i .i na cevni mi to fangypre po'o toi .i = cevni lo gy. remna selfu}
Yes and no. Not gods to me (just aliens), but gods to their human servants.=
=A0
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Jones <= eye= onus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:00 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
Then I believe that the jbovlaste definition of {cevni} is= misleading:
  Definition: x1 is a/the god/deity of people(s)/relig=
ion x2 with dominion
       over x3 [sphere]; x1 is divine.
note the secondary definition. = I would consider angels to be divine.

= Well, then you're using a different sense of the word "divine"= ; than jbovlaste is, because the sense of "divine" in the English= definition of {cevni} is "(of or pertaining to a god): deific, godlik= e, godly", whereas you seem to be meaning "(eternal, holy): hallo= wed, holy, sacred".

On = Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@g= mail.com> wrote:
Even demons, and if you stretch the meaning = /really/ far, djinn.


On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@= gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
xu se cumki smuni lo ka ce'u ge angeli gi cevni

<= /div>{cevni} can refer to many different things, but not angels. Gods, godd= esses, demi-god(esse)s, oni, and so on and so forth.

But not angels.= Angels are not gods, they aren't even god-like. Except for maybe the a= rchangels, they're barely above humans, and in many ways are lower on t= he totem pole (like the complete lack of free will, emotion, or creativity,= for example).

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )



--
mu'o = mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi= .luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father= . :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
= mu'o mi'e .arpis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
=A0=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Alex R

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

= .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'= o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f6438f24cd0a204d2303bd6--