Received: from mail-ea0-f188.google.com ([209.85.215.188]:41015) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tq3IY-0000fG-TQ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:58:48 -0800 Received: by mail-ea0-f188.google.com with SMTP id l12sf5625464eaa.5 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:58:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=gzKaSGFj1t+ZHuSIAhHGuiukkJk8Ir6Gaphi2OZEQ9k=; b=KzIpLzT4bva9B6N4BAOGOO/LmFIg32IaMA6wwdXc5KgoaMz//K8vB62L0bVnTbxzST XCZmFj763bmDrbVMI1CuqqgSumlasyJvB09e6azIcY6dIBJkSd4m50B/bxKPjr5fjWC5 RTn5eaitOUCn2nvFnsK0sHJ4cgM5UTmDzEJrifctT3SyK31mTq3P8R749c906zj8xAKU GOR/M6mQ7MYdllvwM9UUR/xF9GnCBvZdMU0oxDMU1KsGRBV7nXBSM+DX0Ni+oKSud0jy CqZohmJYBr5wwAojiWIrVEX/Vklb/RUPXVEjUXLf+QAkkVyxiQMZqHz5KY5j/K7wooJX 5RmA== X-Received: by 10.180.74.204 with SMTP id w12mr7122523wiv.7.1357052307060; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:58:27 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.87.230 with SMTP id bb6ls5196066wib.12.gmail; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:58:26 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.180.2 with SMTP id i2mr54476018eem.1.1357052306333; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:58:26 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.180.2 with SMTP id i2mr54476017eem.1.1357052306322; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9si1698726eeo.1.2013.01.01.06.58.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-d9ba69d0.pool.mediaWays.net [217.186.105.208]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8C2AB8637A6 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:58:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:58:25 +0100 From: v4hn To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Distinguishing between free and bound variables Message-ID: <20130101145825.GF32434@samsa.fritz.box> References: <1356899917.25852.76.camel@thomas> <20121231122731.GD32434@samsa.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4f28nU6agdXSinmL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --4f28nU6agdXSinmL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:31:22AM -0500, .arpis. wrote: > > Hopefully in binary at least, that would at least increase the bound to > > 31.. > > That sentence is not difficult at all in my opinion. {.u'i} >=20 > I was thinking that, but I didn't reply because it would have been unprod= uctive. > {lo banli pensi vo'a se pensi simsa} (great minds think alike) {u'isai} If you say so. > > Maybe > > {ju'o do na skudji lonu ba'e broda} > > "Surely you don't mean to say -something unspecified-" > > works? > That doesn't work for the same reason as {ko'a}; I may have used {cei} > somewhere to bind it. > If I say "You are not allowed to say things like 'X is stupid'", I don't > mean that you're not allowed to call a particular person stupid but that > you're not allowed to call anyone stupid; however, I'm not using {da} to > bind to the referent of your insult. Instead I'm providing a template for > making a bridi and telling you not to use any bridi that could be made > using that template. >=20 > > I can't find a scenario in which the /X/ would > > not take a specific value depending on context. Fair enough. Still, in quotations broda/ko'a should work out, because _your_ usage of {cei} should not influence the quote. {tolcurmi lonu do cusku lu ko'a bebna li'u} "it's not allowed that you say '/X/ is silly'" works out in my opinion, for the speaker would use {losedu'u ko'a bebna} if he would mean a specific (bound) {ko'a}. If you would like to avoid these assignables, {tolcurmi lonu do cusku lu li'o bebna li'u} might do the trick..? v4hn --4f28nU6agdXSinmL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlDi+ZEACgkQMBKLZs4+wjzK8wCePtpbTVBbnz8q+JaBkG9jSeUf 2ZcAn39dh38NHBMDq0mTqyTiXd89aVLY =/1p8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4f28nU6agdXSinmL--