Received: from mail-gg0-f184.google.com ([209.85.161.184]:41118) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TqVOU-0001Zn-2Z; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:46 -0800 Received: by mail-gg0-f184.google.com with SMTP id q3sf8701896gge.1 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=rkGnEXP4nKEiro8PYYNiIIgpRC6nsLNOypGn0i0QTeU=; b=x0uoO6abIi+9R9lNU3lJCf2ulULWgGhn9xxySdLL7LwmuexpiZaPN8Zp21j/2qtOz1 NstSM5DNqMPu49t6XMcRBfbjERnjYdIkMqLPX025m6LtYHEee2a3CzqVke15Qg8l4I91 aBKggYYBfjTk4iCeEMLBpdUeHMrLjZyKO3kfuyNO1Uc0T7Tf1mAGpsuzWpRjYe4Aar0T tWC3AiUJe4WYJkJnRP2LgRtdjE0tfJ2K8oA9ceeNPdDhWRf9aITZqkhM68b5w/2yQoP3 qjDQaXBlcYm6SaLFY7eOB+8Dz2pZMhzlUvOeVjZyM6VjAbE1tBauDPxvJTq0jd8QzOKd 1Crw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=rkGnEXP4nKEiro8PYYNiIIgpRC6nsLNOypGn0i0QTeU=; b=F31ibudp0Q7wz4Z1A0j8TGtLy3JpoMrZDFZjXk84+Am6jzh42tyBzCboD4mJik1f9A qnf9QXnjFwtBtO41quNcO/wFoMD0tm+OF1HuiIYUsoWEfdo4Qd5FWy+0rVwBpieebH04 MZFkcS0oa0CczkuGr4vnckyP24iEfqtqL//53CJedJWoFMYpGhLCNy9Xy/eVuXCwFImk 8z/J4svy4qjs6Q59ekF3uQ+bdwuKbz8cDfXCww5iT0qD30Au8Gn/jiPVZfxczqUTn2YQ Qyo/rjqiXrd7U/53BeleK3ZJXnPs0OQL8RSwj31MmtegbuB4Rq/JQRphgyrGPTN923Z4 e9OQ== X-Received: by 10.50.45.170 with SMTP id o10mr2113617igm.17.1357160307410; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:27 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.163.38 with SMTP id yf6ls10713278igb.12.gmail; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:27 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.0.148 with SMTP id 20mr41930356ige.3.1357160306982; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.0.148 with SMTP id 20mr41930354ige.3.1357160306950; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hw1si4273851igc.3.2013.01.02.12.58.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of frankdmartinez@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.171; Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 17so17353522iea.2 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.32.71 with SMTP id c7mr36320156icd.35.1357160306869; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.86.230 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:58:26 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] PEG confusion From: Frank To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: frankdmartinez@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of frankdmartinez@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=frankdmartinez@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec517cda8fe853404d25481d4 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec517cda8fe853404d25481d4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So, I'm a wee bit confused and I apologize if this was brought up before. Is there a "de facto" standard for the would-be PEG grammar of lojban? Is it .alyn.'s? Robin's? Are We going by the principle of "Anyone willing to 'roll Their own' can, if not should, do so and We'll sort out the differences later"? Just curious. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec517cda8fe853404d25481d4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, I'm a wee bit confused and I apologize if this was brought up befor= e. Is there a "de facto" standard for the would-be PEG grammar of= lojban? Is it .alyn.'s? Robin's? Are We going by the principle of = "Anyone willing to 'roll Their own' can, if not=A0should,=A0do so=A0and We'll sort out the differences later"?

Just curious.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec517cda8fe853404d25481d4--