Received: from mail-oa0-f59.google.com ([209.85.219.59]:46244) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TqWgw-0002HS-57; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:21:59 -0800 Received: by mail-oa0-f59.google.com with SMTP id k1sf9115945oag.24 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:21:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from :to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=LN02IR1+WCM/BGgPh/5n2r6N1E4bi9tvVQO7Yao8H3k=; b=SSnA8mGY70CpPYeN3DwPh7lWzPRuKjI4ssFgVvE5AYuAnqqysZh92LLai3Mc/05urQ wBEycV8ZiSsWPj0xfxBmX7hB42/UErwgrr6J6LthKWV79aC4nz86rVoGLGFQ6IR8LxVy 3OJxq23w+BUBeZ9c6+nZNkP4Hj4ESdw0Y3kUcZeQKTnRxlgJ1l72XpszWjyshop6HzPN iSU0EIx7Umii/6EykdrDsc3+QJiDLbWFLeGQs5vllLd2YoaCAbHw5CQi1t7OmQiV4BPS yN3ompEA0+lYanR/KwbQEJp7YkOAAGgyIvKx/oOvuXCnQe5OOWsPEQcGp6o+8tClb3ZI 19rA== X-Received: by 10.50.203.9 with SMTP id km9mr12875347igc.7.1357165295780; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.170.97 with SMTP id al1ls14273636igc.28.canary; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.79.105 with SMTP id i9mr5963116pax.34.1357165295198; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.79.105 with SMTP id i9mr5963115pax.34.1357165295185; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id js4si9486294pbb.2.2013.01.02.14.21.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TqWgo-0002HN-2r for lojban@googlegroups.com; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:21:34 -0800 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:21:34 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] PEG confusion Message-ID: <20130102222133.GW18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20130102210716.GA8967@sunflowerriver.org> <20130102220529.GV18038@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:08:50PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robin Lee Powell < > rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 02:27:12PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:07 PM, .alyn.post. > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'd like mine to be the official one. It requires more work on > > > > my end yet before I consider it in good enough shape to submit > > > > as a proposal. > > > > > > > > There are not substantive differences, right now, between > > > > jbogenturfa'i and camxes. The files are different at the > > > > bit-level, but the parser level produces the same result. Robin > > > > and I have shared patches as errata have come up. > > > > > > > > The grammars will diverge when I merge my magic-word work. I > > > > got burned out on that effort last year and have been trying to > > > > restart it. It is standing in the way of other work I'd also > > > > like to do. So far life keeps intervening. > > > > > > > > > > You mean, because you'll /have/ magic-word parsing, which no other > > > parser has as of yet? > > > > camxes most certainly *does* have magic word parsing: > > > > Well, si is easy. IIRC, sa and su aren't working in jbosku or .camxes., and > there are some magic word combos that aren't worked out either, like zo si > (although I'm sure zo si is worked out to be: zo si = "si", zo si si = "".) The problem is that the CLL's explanations of magic words *cannot* be reconciled; there are direct contradictions. "su" is, in fact, working, and while sa isn't perfect, it works too: rlpowell@stodi> echo 'mi klama lo klama sa le sutra' | camxes text sentence |- CMAVO | KOhA: mi |- bridiTail3 |- BRIVLA | gismu: klama |- sumti6 |- CMAVO | LE: le |- BRIVLA gismu: sutra http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Magic+Words encodes the decisions I made in camxes; in some places camxes doesn't actually do what that page says, and in some places even with how detailed that page tried to be it's *still* incomplete. That's why aisa is working on it. -Robin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.