Or was it written from scratch?

On Thursday, January 3, 2013 2:21:34 AM UTC+4, Robin Powell= wrote:

On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at= 03:08:50PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robin Lee Powell <
> rlpo...@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 02:27:12PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrot= e:
> > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:07 PM, .alyn.post.
> > > <alyn...@lodockikumazvati.org>wrote= :
> > >
> > > > I'd like mine to be the official one. It requ= ires more work on
> > > > my end yet before I consider it in good enough shap= e to submit
> > > > as a proposal.
> > > >
> > > > There are not substantive differences, right now, b= etween
> > > > jbogenturfa'i and camxes. The files are diffe= rent at the
> > > > bit-level, but the parser level produces the same r= esult. Robin
> > > > and I have shared patches as errata have come up.
> > > >
> > > > The grammars will diverge when I merge my magic-wor= d work. I
> > > > got burned out on that effort last year and have be= en trying to
> > > > restart it. It is standing in the way of othe= r work I'd also
> > > > like to do. So far life keeps intervening.
> > > >
> > >
> > > You mean, because you'll /have/ magic-word parsing, whic= h no other
> > > parser has as of yet?
> >
> > camxes most certainly *does* have magic word parsing:
> >
>=20
> Well, si is easy. IIRC, sa and su aren't working in jbosku or .cam= xes., and
> there are some magic word combos that aren't worked out either, li= ke zo si
> (although I'm sure zo si is worked out to be: zo si =3D "si", zo s= i si =3D "".)

The problem is that the CLL's explanations of magic words *cannot*
be reconciled; there are direct contradictions. "su" is, in fact,
working, and while sa isn't perfect, it works too:

rlpowell@stodi> echo 'mi klama lo klama sa le sutra' | camxes
text
sentence
|- CMAVO
| KOhA: mi
|- bridiTail3
|- BRIVLA
| gismu: klama
|- sumti6
|- CMAVO
| LE: le
|- BRIVLA
gismu: sutra

ht= tp://www.lojban.org/tiki/Magic+Words encodes the decisions I made
in camxes; in some places camxes doesn't actually do what that page
says, and in some places even with how detailed that page tried to
be it's *still* incomplete. That's why aisa is working on it.

-Robin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/eT= fCbDn0Fs0J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_214_3482720.1357192969025--