Received: from mail-vc0-f191.google.com ([209.85.220.191]:57917) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TqoAs-00010F-PU; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:01:56 -0800 Received: by mail-vc0-f191.google.com with SMTP id fo13sf9249323vcb.28 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:01:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=coD14E62JULv0UhVxLJzMX61z2MU88cHk0eZdCM94gs=; b=jpBb4tiNwY0wor9VAgh369hKjZMifAmjDwxn3ALhXstCcUvfAjvF6jyK30V5stevaf rqgD7JEh5QusaSVABznegwULV69/0dU8ZbgxAaBcZioSODd48Bj90GfGFbQkqecZh+z9 Umi4tk40lzRPObKrCvl8Mef8PAi1ME1rSkl+ac4SG4zMpTbsq4KY7ECuS4hyNr6BOaOv 3HBPkD9BAHR0WTQQ3ae8sfMv5Gk1gwFK+q2EUtSqZT9ycT0zLupO719DxHzgu63N3GiK eboSKUX9/bcEUyba6xezbxPO/fqHz/A9V6GHU2xgKCqhlL49R1qbLXcvcTX9nKZcZ6vz /4HA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:date:from:to:message-id :in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=coD14E62JULv0UhVxLJzMX61z2MU88cHk0eZdCM94gs=; b=FTP6fYvM9cPWYeaez7tzgpdBLRrc+/gVUAAFydw9OCV2V7nHlJVsm9lQnCILoDHf+V psOC2xkCffMvOn+HncKfLPxBjFYv8m0fDg4XgZr+U1geEX5l3ppFBqjbgvUEOHvDVQOo mw9itEngy9BPlwmOv+NWoq0tpabnxKrw7K/u24P/k9ZjXv+7teqyDb/2/Skv6pN9A5gn f9OJT/H5qgABbUOzS0P1MGl+x1C/wSwdcY/YGZY75tF52VksjiInKslB3PcaMyLnPP6I p7qpy1hQCq+Dsx+oAzIm9Xne62GQXffx/Kqg2Ep/D1L95m2gLnIgTAZnhIOJn8nCYmmE XtsA== X-Received: by 10.49.15.38 with SMTP id u6mr8146318qec.8.1357232498970; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:01:38 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.35.49 with SMTP id e17ls6694081qej.59.gmail; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:01:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.24.13 with SMTP id q13mr8268246qef.33.1357232497547; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:01:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:01:36 -0800 (PST) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: Context and precision (was:Re: [lojban-beginners] Special reference, underspecified) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_538_23978589.1357232496797" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_538_23978589.1357232496797 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thursday, January 3, 2013 8:01:16 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote: > > (In the event that my comments below spark a discussion, I've moved this > to the main list and altered the subject to reflect the topic at hand.) > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Ian Johnson > > wrote: > >> This drastically hinders the precision (in fact it basically makes it >> exactly the same as PA lo GISMU), but yes, PA GISMU under this model is an >> extremely compact form for a rather uncommon usage. >> >> But fair enough; at the very least the {pa se pelkre} version is sketchy, >> and we'll leave it at that. > > > I'm a firm believer in determinism via context and precision via > verbosity. That is, I believe that anything about an expression that can be > figured out from the context that expression is in, should be left to > context, and that a more precise expression should always, without > exception, require more words to express than a similar, less precise one. > i'e > > My reasoning behind both is simply that following those doctrines means we > can say things in Lojban more succintly, a definite boon considering the > wordiness the language has, IMO. > > And it's not at all difficult to add {roroi fe'eroroi} to make the context > be "always and everywhere". It does, obviously, require more words, but > that's in line with the above. > sorry for asking questions not necessarily relevant to this discussion but can't we just say {ca ro da bu'u ro de} instead of {roroi fe'eroroi} or even {cajebu'u ro da} ? > >> mi'e la latro'a mu'o >> >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Jonathan Jones >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Ian Johnson >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> The first version is wrong; that says "there exists exactly one yellow >>>> haired thing which ..." (Rather, there is a very slightly less >>>> controversial version that I tend to subscribe to: "there is exactly one >>>> yellow-haired thing that is at all possible to come up in discussion which >>>> ..." The point is that the default universe of discourse should be the >>>> *universe* of discourse, there shouldn't be anything that be >>>> reasonably anticipated to come up in conversation that isn't actually in >>>> it.) >>>> >>> >>> I subscribe to the idea that the "universe of discourse" is bound by the >>> context that discourse is in, mainly because forcing PA GISMU to mean that >>> there is exactly PA things that GISMU makes the construct pretty much >>> useless, seeing as statements like that are pretty much always incorrect. >>> But this isn't the list to talk about thee issues, being the beginner's >>> thread and all. >>> >>> >>>> If you use su'o instead it's not terrible, but really {da} constructs >>>> when you don't want nice sharp precision tend to be undesirable, in my >>>> experience. >>>> >>>> At any rate, here I'd probably say {lo se ke pelxu kerfa}. {le} might >>>> also be appropriate in this context, but I doubt I'd use it. That said, I >>>> think more likely the structure of the discussion would be different among >>>> fluent in-real-life Lojban speakers. (Few of these exist; I, for example, >>>> am pretty quick on IRC, but am almost completely helpless when it comes to >>>> spatial things.) I'd expect a lot of up-front establishment of pronouns, >>>> for example. >>>> >>>> mi'e la latro'a mu'o >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jonathan Jones >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:01 AM, neizyn. >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> coi >>>>>> .i mi'e neizyn. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I'm just a beginnger! but I was wondering about a special >>>>>> situation. >>>>>> Suppose there's a group of girls with one guy; I'm talking to one of >>>>>> the girls, and I make a statement referring to the guy without >>>>>> unambiguously referring to him by name or other reference. This is because >>>>>> he's the only person in the group like that. Say he's blonde. Is there a >>>>>> way I can say that "someone is blond" oooooor 'blonde exists/obtains such >>>>>> that x is blonde' ? Better yet, could I use that with some kind of >>>>>> reference? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> {pa pelxre} == {pa da poi pelkre} => "one X which-is golden-haired" >>>>> {pa lo prenu poi pelxre} => "A singular person which-is blonde" >>>>> {lo pelxre prenu} => "One or more blonde type-of person" >>>>> {ko'a goi (any of the above)} => "It-1, which-is what we will call >>>>> {any of the above)" >>>>> >>>>> I'm sure there's other ways to do it as well, but those are the most >>>>> obvious, to me at any rate. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>> >>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com >>>>> . >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com . >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com >>>> . >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com . >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com >>> . >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Lojban Beginners" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/j3NErWcKXg8J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_538_23978589.1357232496797 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, January 3, 2013 8:01:16 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:(In the event that my comments below = spark a discussion, I've moved this to the main list and altered the subjec= t to reflect the topic at hand.)

On Thu, = Jan 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Ian Johnson <blindb...@g= mail.com> wrote:
This drastically hinders the precision (in f= act it basically makes it exactly the same as PA lo GISMU), but yes, PA GIS= MU under this model is an extremely compact form for a rather uncommon usag= e.

But fair enough; at the very least the {pa se pelkre} version is sketch= y, and we'll leave it at that.

I'm a firm believer in = determinism via context and precision via verbosity. That is, I believe tha= t anything about an expression that can be figured out from the context tha= t expression is in, should be left to context, and that a more precise expr= ession should always, without exception, require more words to express than= a similar, less precise one.

i'e
 
<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">

My reasoning behind both is simply that following those doctrines means= we can say things in Lojban more succintly, a definite boon considering th= e wordiness the language has, IMO.

And it's not at all difficult to = add {roroi fe'eroroi} to make the context be "always and everywhere". It do= es, obviously, require more words, but that's in line with the above.

sorry for asking questions not n= ecessarily relevant to this discussion but can't we just say 
{ca ro da bu'u ro de} instead of {roroi fe'eroroi} or even {cajebu'u ro d= a} ?

 
mi'e la latro'a mu'o
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com> wrote:


On T= hu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Ian Johnson <blindb.= ..@gmail.com> wrote:
The first version is wrong; that says "there exists exactly one yellow hair= ed thing which ..." (Rather, there is a very slightly less controversial ve= rsion that I tend to subscribe to: "there is exactly one yellow-haired thin= g that is at all possible to come up in discussion which ..." The point is = that the default universe of discourse should be the universe of dis= course, there shouldn't be anything that be reasonably anticipated to come = up in conversation that isn't actually in it.)

I subscribe to the idea that the "universe of d= iscourse" is bound by the context that discourse is in, mainly because forc= ing PA GISMU to mean that there is exactly PA things that GISMU makes the c= onstruct pretty much useless, seeing as statements like that are pretty muc= h always incorrect. But this isn't the list to talk about thee issues, bein= g the beginner's thread and all.
 
If you use su'o instead it's not terrible, but really {da} constructs when = you don't want nice sharp precision tend to be undesirable, in my experienc= e.

At any rate, here I'd probably say {lo se ke pelxu kerfa}. {le} = might also be appropriate in this context, but I doubt I'd use it. That sai= d, I think more likely the structure of the discussion would be different a= mong fluent in-real-life Lojban speakers. (Few of these exist; I, for examp= le, am pretty quick on IRC, but am almost completely helpless when it comes= to spatial things.) I'd expect a lot of up-front establishment of pronouns= , for example.

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

On Wed= , Jan 2, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jonathan Jones <eye...= @gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:01 AM, neizyn. <<= a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"o-HKUMQIW= GwJ">sja...@gmail.com> wrote:
coi
.i mi'e neizyn.
 
Sorry, I'm ju= st a beginnger! but I was wondering about a special situation.
Su= ppose there's a group of girls with one guy; I'm talking to one of the girl= s, and I make a statement referring to the guy without unambiguously referr= ing to him by name or other reference. This is because he's the only person= in the group like that. Say he's blonde. Is there a way I can say tha= t "someone is blond" oooooor 'blonde exists/obtains such that x is blonde' = ? Better yet, could I use that with some kind of reference? 

{pa pelxre} =3D=3D {pa da poi pelkre} =3D> "= one X which-is golden-haired"
{pa lo prenu poi pelxre} =3D> "A singul= ar person which-is blonde"
{lo pelxre prenu} =3D> "One or more blonde= type-of person"
{ko'a goi (any of the above)} =3D> "It-1, which-is what we will call {an= y of the above)"

I'm sure there's other ways to do it as well, but t= hose are the most obvious, to me at any rate.=

--
mu'o mi'e .aio= nys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do= zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.co= m.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= wbr>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.co= m.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= wbr>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa b= u .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.co= m.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= wbr>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.co= m.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@= googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= wbr>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .= aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu= do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/j3= NErWcKXg8J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_538_23978589.1357232496797--