Received: from mail-gg0-f186.google.com ([209.85.161.186]:57037) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TqpKE-0001bG-BA; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:45 -0800 Received: by mail-gg0-f186.google.com with SMTP id y6sf9156453ggc.23 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=XRBuWOloQaW7iNdQ9QLJ4yCuKhJrd4Orhh9E+XLClO8=; b=mn2tbqBxsxxgKABqEoJu/1B139Az38+rVnZHDnvRdJz2HZEtwxbV0fSkBVUBBI1Whv 4StjevWjBRw8P0+svXOUOspS3vRYgasjGQSIe4/Ooo6j6F4LhdHdbAp2D3wUKcbxYKLv QYoGlfLwweCZDkfj0c+ieuqjIvMh+hjA1kyhgf2a/A3ZiycBYNO6U+z13CGMsfreT8eF twNogdEOrji/AQXIDNetcxHGemLGgI75OoPi235W1FBn1SyAG3cS8mUAasW2CJnArx30 sAfK5yI1M0EydE+QfjG563HT7zZiutnVQcW9sRfEBtqQa1o9tbxZAfkF6NvflcU9RlxB dNog== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=XRBuWOloQaW7iNdQ9QLJ4yCuKhJrd4Orhh9E+XLClO8=; b=ZetR3xMFNjfASeQCNQ3uAJMaRXi612Bo/viFQKSl2UJansbwHf5n1gzXqRXf+/mv65 fVwJf5WpIaTcJ2H8nsBGmOOMTp5RV2yXAWr9CDnmZj305jvYQf2w2pMqh3SkYtakUeio n7DeyBM9u9x9tVTihJDbIKtOx34TEd1PK6rKgHunO1siTysNwaKCmpUMKw3GBzPCTf7b +ZoT6mCJRkJ7OdeZydBoZDiEy3TTPuXAZYgEmRpEfeJK0ccEqryJ4u3NBMrMqTEbraOu FwO7IUqvPEiw4IEf3RBq/EIZ/bVpk7chFU5S45wboUQuEeNMimwmBeedF5MWEUx+EdeU ExTg== X-Received: by 10.50.42.194 with SMTP id q2mr16382450igl.11.1357236923629; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:23 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.197.168 with SMTP id iv8ls7966062igc.34.gmail; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:23 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.43.49.195 with SMTP id vb3mr38917690icb.24.1357236923075; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:23 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.43.49.195 with SMTP id vb3mr38917688icb.24.1357236923047; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (mail-oa0-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s15si4468685igi.1.2013.01.03.10.15.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.51; Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id n12so14251200oag.38 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.172.229 with SMTP id bf5mr27675436oec.81.1357236922694; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:15:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.178.237 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:15:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:15:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Context and precision (was:Re: [lojban-beginners] Special reference, underspecified) From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee86ca73a5404d26658a3 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec54ee86ca73a5404d26658a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:01 AM, la gleki wrote: > >> On Thursday, January 3, 2013 8:01:16 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >> >>> (In the event that my comments below spark a discussion, I've moved this >>> to the main list and altered the subject to reflect the topic at hand.) >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Ian Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> This drastically hinders the precision (in fact it basically makes it >>>> exactly the same as PA lo GISMU), but yes, PA GISMU under this model is an >>>> extremely compact form for a rather uncommon usage. >>>> >>>> But fair enough; at the very least the {pa se pelkre} version is >>>> sketchy, and we'll leave it at that. >>> >>> >>> I'm a firm believer in determinism via context and precision via >>> verbosity. That is, I believe that anything about an expression that can be >>> figured out from the context that expression is in, should be left to >>> context, and that a more precise expression should always, without >>> exception, require more words to express than a similar, less precise one. >>> >> >> i'e >> >> >>> >>> My reasoning behind both is simply that following those doctrines means >>> we can say things in Lojban more succintly, a definite boon considering the >>> wordiness the language has, IMO. >>> >>> And it's not at all difficult to add {roroi fe'eroroi} to make the >>> context be "always and everywhere". It does, obviously, require more words, >>> but that's in line with the above. >>> >> >> sorry for asking questions not necessarily relevant to this discussion >> but can't we just say >> {ca ro da bu'u ro de} instead of {roroi fe'eroroi} or even {cajebu'u ro >> da} ? >> > > I don't see how either of those could mean "always and everywhere: the > whole of time and space" > Also, keep in mind that I'm specifically talking about, for example: {roroi fe'eroroi pa da zo'u da prenu} : "In the whole of time and space there is exactly one X, such that X is a person.", which is what {pa prenu} means if you /don't/ limit it to context. (If you do limit it to context, {pa prenu} means pretty much the same thing {pa lo prenu} does, as latro'a pointed out.) > mi'e la latro'a mu'o >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Ian Johnson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The first version is wrong; that says "there exists exactly one >>>>>> yellow haired thing which ..." (Rather, there is a very slightly less >>>>>> controversial version that I tend to subscribe to: "there is exactly one >>>>>> yellow-haired thing that is at all possible to come up in discussion which >>>>>> ..." The point is that the default universe of discourse should be the >>>>>> *universe* of discourse, there shouldn't be anything that be >>>>>> reasonably anticipated to come up in conversation that isn't actually in >>>>>> it.) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I subscribe to the idea that the "universe of discourse" is bound by >>>>> the context that discourse is in, mainly because forcing PA GISMU to mean >>>>> that there is exactly PA things that GISMU makes the construct pretty much >>>>> useless, seeing as statements like that are pretty much always incorrect. >>>>> But this isn't the list to talk about thee issues, being the beginner's >>>>> thread and all. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> If you use su'o instead it's not terrible, but really {da} constructs >>>>>> when you don't want nice sharp precision tend to be undesirable, in my >>>>>> experience. >>>>>> >>>>>> At any rate, here I'd probably say {lo se ke pelxu kerfa}. {le} might >>>>>> also be appropriate in this context, but I doubt I'd use it. That said, I >>>>>> think more likely the structure of the discussion would be different among >>>>>> fluent in-real-life Lojban speakers. (Few of these exist; I, for example, >>>>>> am pretty quick on IRC, but am almost completely helpless when it comes to >>>>>> spatial things.) I'd expect a lot of up-front establishment of pronouns, >>>>>> for example. >>>>>> >>>>>> mi'e la latro'a mu'o >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:01 AM, neizyn. wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> coi >>>>>>>> .i mi'e neizyn. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, I'm just a beginnger! but I was wondering about a special >>>>>>>> situation. >>>>>>>> Suppose there's a group of girls with one guy; I'm talking to one >>>>>>>> of the girls, and I make a statement referring to the guy without >>>>>>>> unambiguously referring to him by name or other reference. This is because >>>>>>>> he's the only person in the group like that. Say he's blonde. Is there a >>>>>>>> way I can say that "someone is blond" oooooor 'blonde exists/obtains such >>>>>>>> that x is blonde' ? Better yet, could I use that with some kind of >>>>>>>> reference? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> {pa pelxre} == {pa da poi pelkre} => "one X which-is golden-haired" >>>>>>> {pa lo prenu poi pelxre} => "A singular person which-is blonde" >>>>>>> {lo pelxre prenu} => "One or more blonde type-of person" >>>>>>> {ko'a goi (any of the above)} => "It-1, which-is what we will call >>>>>>> {any of the above)" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm sure there's other ways to do it as well, but those are the most >>>>>>> obvious, to me at any rate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.**com. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@** >>>>>>> googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>>>>>> group/lojban-beginners?hl=en >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.**com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@** >>>>>> googlegroups.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>>>>> group/lojban-beginners?hl=en >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>> >>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.**com. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@** >>>>> googlegroups.com. >>>>> >>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>>>> group/lojban-beginners?hl=en >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.**com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@** >>>> googlegroups.com. >>>> >>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>>> group/lojban-beginners?hl=en >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/j3NErWcKXg8J. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec54ee86ca73a5404d26658a3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Jones = <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:01 A= M, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
=
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 8:01:16 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
(In the event that my comments bel= ow spark a discussion, I've moved this to the main list and altered the= subject to reflect the topic at hand.)

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:34 AM, I= an Johnson <blindb...@gmail.com> wrot= e:
This drastically hinders the precision (in f= act it basically makes it exactly the same as PA lo GISMU), but yes, PA GIS= MU under this model is an extremely compact form for a rather uncommon usag= e.

But fair enough; at the very least the {pa se pelkre} version is sketch= y, and we'll leave it at that.

I'm a firm beli= ever in determinism via context and precision via verbosity. That is, I bel= ieve that anything about an expression that can be figured out from the con= text that expression is in, should be left to context, and that a more prec= ise expression should always, without exception, require more words to expr= ess than a similar, less precise one.

i'e
= =A0

My reasoning behind both is simply that following those doctrines means= we can say things in Lojban more succintly, a definite boon considering th= e wordiness the language has, IMO.

And it's not at all difficult= to add {roroi fe'eroroi} to make the context be "always and every= where". It does, obviously, require more words, but that's in line= with the above.

sorry for asking questio= ns not necessarily relevant to this discussion but can't we just say=A0=
{ca ro da bu'u ro de} instead of {roroi fe'eroroi} or ev= en {cajebu'u ro da} ?

I don't see how either of those could mean = "always and everywhere: the whole of time and space"

Also, keep in mind that I'm specifically talk= ing about, for example: {roroi fe'eroroi pa da zo'u da prenu} : &qu= ot;In the whole of time and space there is exactly one X, such that X is a = person.", which is what {pa prenu} means if you /don't/ limit it t= o context. (If you do limit it to context, {pa prenu} means pretty much the= same thing {pa lo prenu} does, as latro'a pointed out.)
=A0
mi'e la latro'a mu&#= 39;o

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Jonathan Jones <ey= e...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Ian Johnson <blind= b...@gmail.com> wrote:
The first version is wrong; that says "there exists exactly one yellow= haired thing which ..." (Rather, there is a very slightly less contro= versial version that I tend to subscribe to: "there is exactly one yel= low-haired thing that is at all possible to come up in discussion which ...= " The point is that the default universe of discourse should be the universe of discourse, there shouldn't be anything that be reasona= bly anticipated to come up in conversation that isn't actually in it.) =

I subscribe to the idea that the "universe= of discourse" is bound by the context that discourse is in, mainly be= cause forcing PA GISMU to mean that there is exactly PA things that GISMU m= akes the construct pretty much useless, seeing as statements like that are = pretty much always incorrect. But this isn't the list to talk about the= e issues, being the beginner's thread and all.
=A0
If you use su'o instead it's not terrible, but really {da} construc= ts when you don't want nice sharp precision tend to be undesirable, in = my experience.

At any rate, here I'd probably say {lo se ke pel= xu kerfa}. {le} might also be appropriate in this context, but I doubt I= 9;d use it. That said, I think more likely the structure of the discussion = would be different among fluent in-real-life Lojban speakers. (Few of these= exist; I, for example, am pretty quick on IRC, but am almost completely he= lpless when it comes to spatial things.) I'd expect a lot of up-front e= stablishment of pronouns, for example.

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:01 AM, neizyn. = <sja...@gmail.com> wrote:
coi
.i mi'e neizyn.
=A0
Sorry, I'= ;m just a beginnger! but I was wondering about a special situation.
Suppose there's a group of girls with one guy; I'm talking to on= e of the girls, and I make a statement referring to the guy without unambig= uously referring to him by name or other reference. This is because he'= s the only person in the group like that. Say he's blonde. Is there a w= ay=A0I can say that "someone is blond" oooooor 'blonde exists= /obtains such that x is blonde' ? Better yet, could I use that with som= e kind of reference?=A0

{pa pelxre} =3D=3D {pa da poi pelkre} =3D> &= quot;one X which-is golden-haired"
{pa lo prenu poi pelxre} =3D>= "A singular person which-is blonde"
{lo pelxre prenu} =3D>= "One or more blonde type-of person"
{ko'a goi (any of the above)} =3D> "It-1, which-is what we will= call {any of the above)"

I'm sure there's other ways t= o do it as well, but those are the most obvious, to me at any rate.

--
mu'o mi= 9;e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk.= mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D = )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com= .
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@g= ooglegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= u>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com= .
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@g= ooglegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= u>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cm= ima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com= .
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@g= ooglegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= u>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com= .
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@g= ooglegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/<= u>group/lojban-beginners?hl=3Den.



--
= mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa = bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am yo= ur father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/j3NErWcKXg8J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo= 9;o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec54ee86ca73a5404d26658a3--