Received: from mail-pb0-f60.google.com ([209.85.160.60]:51043)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCD6T3EC2UIBBVH3VODQKGQEFJ4MC7A@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TsFyM-0000nv-GY; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:54:55 -0800
Received: by mail-pb0-f60.google.com with SMTP id wy7sf11528002pbc.25
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:54:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=N/q1ge5NoAwONK7teZV1KHHb9Y/T2x/ASr51qRgRDwA=;
        b=NYafdDxdmxS8kWWqXI2IpT4XAekHTSPUjm78BC0iO0bgXMxrTCTMNohjbQ8hmupU1Y
         PeybPQOg6TwhIHO0eW6hapAwH5VcXAXO4e17YQ9RhV9OQVnIg4WdFKU+vJ9xhBe9cWx2
         +TWvqb3O4PHbdnnujCfKmXDxdTvaVa1yqYhzCro6F1S+5ohOQzR9f04WIfek1NeIeKap
         pR61cd+U/szXLJo25qtFU4hCskcuFFjYuLW7TpxnuOrm/C0K2/jW/jqLrgw2I3xBrvb7
         /izgDGmTB4UIYXhOEe1MDRSdwMgf87PC0oYasn3aqWMtzFJnK23KDL2jgTUwqFFzDuEG
         QkRQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf
         :mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=N/q1ge5NoAwONK7teZV1KHHb9Y/T2x/ASr51qRgRDwA=;
        b=XEasSb0TRddUGQQ4iWycob2TwkbJR4VOlcTg+UaeLOJF1WeOr+G/hYg8uP6xR5OdEU
         SINWPJmIpnCB4Ysu+aQMHmb2bmdW9Rh/F2th17U7ajUgRx56J4MZAvGuTyysp5KRaKmh
         slOrktPsCmIxjHz8Ym8ooCW2ZzSIfbLQDlDegNVzxXdmcfQCqDQ0ElPDBGuxxhRPdpYw
         WAotlxZYjtVWot/9hWxGHbALRV2Dl2weCmf9/ZfwD94fTKMhgOjCIf0o6WQN5TlOjJbH
         lzLeSYgODZGKCicuIEz/fRlgDJQ50wAz4e0G9u9lo5NP05GeiF/dCZ0aQAldvY0AQ43S
         frpw==
X-Received: by 10.50.42.194 with SMTP id q2mr2217481igl.11.1357577684486;
        Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:54:44 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.140.40 with SMTP id rd8ls1898521igb.2.canary; Mon, 07 Jan
 2013 08:54:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.18.9 with SMTP id v9mr34389498ica.32.1357577683746;
        Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:54:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.18.9 with SMTP id v9mr34389497ica.32.1357577683736;
        Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s15si543598igi.1.2013.01.07.08.54.43
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.179;
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k14so24156608iea.10
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:54:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.190.162 with SMTP id gr2mr6165134igc.65.1357577683597;
 Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.142.134 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:54:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALm==BWR0Obhu0V2tSu-Lfy8KUL7eCmYDh+cfQ4kKdXkZZbTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+gZtgKFUxv+j8A71VTWMhrXc8-Xh0F-EQr7nL-tWhjaKWgr4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALMa68qh-sonU4gjYuEQ4iSWvrSgHNoP6bg2RGfX5v8z-hRXkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+gZtgLZa=NPKN2v4g33e1PEj8yGcg7XDok9+LtBecL1hsJBLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+gZtgKgA5hVdStmzcqQkYpFjZaJMtipN0FnoxjAMcpP9p9MTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALMa68p5PrdNLE3Bkhwq=_FFBZNroYQFePD+_mpUjsjeSewu2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALm==BWR0Obhu0V2tSu-Lfy8KUL7eCmYDh+cfQ4kKdXkZZbTHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:54:43 -0300
Message-ID: <CALMa68oVm4sqwFPJV474MbcEuJ_pq_Df0DpV4VpdXmmWPM3OSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Quantifier exactness
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: felipeg.assis@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=felipeg.assis@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On 7 January 2013 12:01, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis
> <felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What is lacking here is the argument /for/ quantifier inexactness,
>> which goes against CLL.
>
>
> Much as I like quantifier exactness as a useful idiosyncrasy in lojban (a=
nd
> view adhering to the CLL) as a good default, I find the example given as =
an
> argument /against/ quantifier exactness (though not an entirely convincin=
g
> one by itself), at least if I take latros's analysis at face value.
>

I don't see how the example is an argument. It is just that, an example.

> The sentence says to me "I, more than you, like one of the two people."
> Unless you can give me an intuition for a translation that preserves exac=
t
> quantifier semantics (and just adding "exactly" to the previous statement
> doesn't do it), I'm going to be uneasy about them.
>

"I, more than you, like one of the two people."
{da poi me lo re prenu zo'u mi zmadu do lo ni ce'u nelci da} or
{mi zmadu do lo ni ce'u nelci lo [su'o/pa] me lo re prenu}

The odd thing with the original example is the quantification within
the ni-clause.

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.