Received: from mail-ye0-f185.google.com ([209.85.213.185]:39201) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsd8P-00058v-1e; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:39:04 -0800 Received: by mail-ye0-f185.google.com with SMTP id l3sf498740yen.2 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:38:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=majILg0DCCyTrTZbXINgVnd8ExHGiSBK7IWngoRgovc=; b=JsxTu4hxw29CuBjvqsC6Gvm50/rSTrbns4oM6PTlYGyHLqACHxuJQQrDfDTZF1/Ht/ vccCZmtU2e+jKO0dTWYO5lFgLe8DPu8pGZMoriMfhNdwbx0Pqq/Dec3gZk1bFgVujJtC xQGuNDNBYe4g1ErKOOLzbS4t1ZpNuN+UmWvCSvtvR9uFd42MB9KPLm8E0f3QIwYuYP++ m+VT7NvYStwW6RYCD8SOSyPbtE2cfbamkaC6EsHMNS1dKag0efumIEVh64t5DAQxfr3T 2x2q7NP6lwiKq359vZIcLjWkV4PtVqd2JSzY7UvBKyHZ/Qyz9+z1CNo3Q6YAeF92pec0 XFiA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=majILg0DCCyTrTZbXINgVnd8ExHGiSBK7IWngoRgovc=; b=XFuxSvrYfCVb5xgC9gBpWZijLuWIvwjCZPCAZPuJZcGTYR7tYdOmgqQaJJLha881bl fl4mFkor8pZ7oBY4N81VXhlTZgKW6F2ZZOcc6QQj4dNoN+S3VpOkb8F7Jx7gqTPWq40Z qg0q+N3ePcBwLI91hrgUTEZCCYM2hbcKY+d56y9FK7MuMnux65MdIteEDH8TCRjbmRj5 YWhSNH2gVGlDzIiNjrjBcHOiHO93BQil5NepG+kAp44fC2fm93dPejOi9FhB9OOI9URY G1vMidkh0U6KVaFGwrWroR2564QW6zG58eBb8ksnoxKI3fBd3VImBCF0aIV6rikTZ+fM vuMQ== X-Received: by 10.49.87.1 with SMTP id t1mr11129381qez.41.1357666717487; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:38:37 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.110.10 with SMTP id hw10ls465847qeb.54.gmail; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.216.100 with SMTP id op4mr29865305vec.25.1357666716182; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.216.100 with SMTP id op4mr29865302vec.25.1357666716159; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-f50.google.com (mail-vb0-f50.google.com [209.85.212.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20si17202479vdg.3.2013.01.08.09.38.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.50; Received: by mail-vb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ft2so664544vbb.9 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.107.5 with SMTP id z5mr87646688vco.22.1357666716069; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.13.197 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:38:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:38:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] searching From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7bd455b09b04d2ca6a1a X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d043c7bd455b09b04d2ca6a1a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If you defined it the other way, you wouldn't get quite the same thing by just attaching {poi}. Instead you could wind up looking for a definite shirt, rather than just "some green shirt". {da} wouldn't fix this either, because the quantifier would be in the wrong place. (That is, "I'm looking for {da poi crino}" is "There exists a green thing that I'm looking for"; the existential is outside the looking. To move it inside you would need an abstractor, which is exactly what gimste-sisku does.) Ultimately I agree, {sisku} as currently defined is rather strange to consider as the primitive. It feels excessively abstracted from everyday life, even if it is occasionally rather compact/precise. mi'e la latro'a mu'o On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > Yeah, I wasn't looking for a "we should change lojban suck that..." sort > of thing. I assumed there was some solution. > > Just kind of sucks that it's very easy for me to say "I am looking for a > green thing in my dresser" (mi sisku lo (ka?) crino lo seldacru). But for > "I'm looking for my keys", I've either got to spend half the day spelling > it all out, or I guess selkik's tanru works tolerably well "mi troci co > zvafa'i lo mi ckiku" > > I guess it just seems like an unfortunate definition for sisku given how > easy it is to *add* an object-by-property aspect to the searching. i.e. > "mi sisku lo creka poi crino" or even "mi sisku lo crino creka". > > meh, it is what it is. > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > >> Little correction: >> >> On 8 January 2013 12:08, Jacob Errington wrote: >> > Using Lojban as it is without changing anything, there is a convoluted >> > way to use sisku as-is, like this: >> > .i mi sisku lo ka lo mi ckiku cu zvati ce'u kei ro zo'e ne lo zdani >> >> {ro zo'e ne lo mi zdani} distributes, which is bad, so we need to make >> it into a mass/set: >> {loi ro zo'e ne lo mi zdani} is better, but you could probably use {lo >> zdani} outright as a sisku3, in which case you're considering the >> house to be a mass/set of all the places within (because xorlo). >> >> .i mi'e la tsani mu'o >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d043c7bd455b09b04d2ca6a1a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you defined it the other way, you wouldn't get quite the same thing = by just attaching {poi}. Instead you could wind up looking for a definite s= hirt, rather than just "some green shirt". {da} wouldn't fix = this either, because the quantifier would be in the wrong place. (That is, = "I'm looking for {da poi crino}" is "There exists a gree= n thing that I'm looking for"; the existential is outside the look= ing. To move it inside you would need an abstractor, which is exactly what = gimste-sisku does.)=A0

Ultimately I agree, {sisku} as currently defined is rather s= trange to consider as the primitive. It feels excessively abstracted from e= veryday life, even if it is occasionally rather compact/precise.

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com= > wrote:
Yeah, I wasn't looking for a "we sh= ould change lojban suck that..." sort of thing. =A0I assumed there was= some solution.

Just kind of sucks that it's very easy for me to say &qu= ot;I am looking for a green thing in my dresser" (mi sisku lo (ka?) cr= ino lo seldacru). =A0But for "I'm looking for my keys", I'= ;ve either got to spend half the day spelling it all out, or I guess selkik= 's tanru works =A0tolerably=A0well "mi troci co zvafa'i lo mi = ckiku"

I guess it just seems like an unfortunate definition fo= r sisku given how easy it is to add=A0an object-by-property aspect t= o the searching. =A0i.e. =A0"mi sisku lo creka poi crino" or even= "mi sisku lo crino creka".

meh, it is what it is.


On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Jacob Errington <= span dir=3D"ltr"><nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
Little correction:

On 8 January 2013 12:08, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using Lojban as it is without changing anything, there is a convoluted=
> way to use sisku as-is, like this:
> .i mi sisku lo ka lo mi ckiku cu zvati ce'u kei ro zo'e ne lo = zdani

{ro zo'e ne lo mi zdani} distributes, which is bad, so we need to= make
it into a mass/set:
{loi ro zo'e ne lo mi zdani} is better, but you could probably use {lo<= br> zdani} outright as a sisku3, in which case you're considering the
house to be a mass/set of all the places within (because xorlo).

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d043c7bd455b09b04d2ca6a1a--