Received: from mail-bk0-f55.google.com ([209.85.214.55]:39950) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tsx4D-00082l-Pq; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:56:09 -0800 Received: by mail-bk0-f55.google.com with SMTP id ik5sf797467bkc.20 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:55:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-y-gmx-trusted :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=/AFKUfBYY9wHY3tZvcNKFy96PVV6ZzQWb74twmWApOU=; b=kIIyNxT6XsMyiDuSDDG82hrmprvVEm763/K4Tx9VBGylJh/jnkUtI1RWGPxkA4LUmy uRzYyf8OaBsy4s4T7M8p7FjpEA3GaTS9dezqu1XvpNKtUMOazD1AodyU4hY0mlegyZlv k28d4HFu2txVocCz02VRUOolMBT3opDfZmPP6jDHggxtWnmyOT9Nb4CVvBbccqmJ8d0E te8sbQvVPIqLe53KLjdLpIYkUTW4Wb7SF9w5i88a3b2D0RvVaaDGdX7zQl8g5XbAAn58 dFCGk1QVbqLaXOo4HzKjBOqw63zbgqmDEqO2mtHtGlQOcLN7KX2GhqXp6AeVyc0eCI6m 3/Vg== X-Received: by 10.180.89.241 with SMTP id br17mr386672wib.4.1357743337290; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:55:37 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.74.70 with SMTP id r6ls2242541wiv.26.canary; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:55:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.179.198 with SMTP id h46mr85333578eem.4.1357743335052; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:55:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.179.198 with SMTP id h46mr85333577eem.4.1357743335039; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.19]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id g9si11651879eeo.1.2013.01.09.06.55.35; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.19; Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.28]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MSFoz-1TQk853XSt-00TRra for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:55:34 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Jan 2013 14:55:34 -0000 Received: from p54AF410A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.2.100]) [84.175.65.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2013 15:55:34 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/aFDM4fQbaMJpLD7t4AcB6eoEFAm2CY8myZXGjwF jOoGI8DnFl2l9x Message-ID: <50ED84E7.7070405@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:55:35 +0100 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] request for a new gismu: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Episodic_memory References:

<20130109142120.GF14601@samsa.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <20130109142120.GF14601@samsa.fritz.box> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: la .van. cu cusku di'e > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:09:17AM -0500, Craig Daniel wrote: >> Isn't this just the distinction between remembering a nu and >> remembering a du'u? Or am I missing something? > > More between {morji lo du'u} and {morji lo li'i} > as was pointed out already. > > However, at the moment {morji} is restricted to {du'u} > (see definition), so normally you shouldn't be allowed > to use {morji} with {nu}/{li'i}. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (seladwa[at]gmx.de) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid la .van. cu cusku di'e > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:09:17AM -0500, Craig Daniel wrote: >> Isn't this just the distinction between remembering a nu and >> remembering a du'u? Or am I missing something? > > More between {morji lo du'u} and {morji lo li'i} > as was pointed out already. > > However, at the moment {morji} is restricted to {du'u} > (see definition), so normally you shouldn't be allowed > to use {morji} with {nu}/{li'i}. Without adding any new gismu, there is also the possibility of: mi morji lo du'u ma kau li'i se tarbi I remember what it was like to be pregnant. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.