Received: from mail-la0-f64.google.com ([209.85.215.64]:53780) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tus7u-0003CQ-3C; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:39 -0800 Received: by mail-la0-f64.google.com with SMTP id fq13sf2027757lab.19 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=0CW8fl/D3h0La/y7ceQMJJxHvOS+i5m2gp54cvRwmnk=; b=DHX17CMZIjiFxgcVS1fsA6aTkHa9vNXiYlspe4FhC4yZln22/TSqpYZNJOqXsQuUc5 g07XbQbgvWIMkWw76XWwZDZp64O5uZf5VBgOcF3aGtVSel5WDD/3NtHipBOoqEgc5FiD bzENa77WVx/BcomIKWqxHeByjyvX/6zbWB6M+v/eN+BlJibT19qzDGVwJCYqoqbqOjOM xCSHGavF8WP4T98Uh0aPjnebre0A/gvKaREOrODLJ4XOmydyXBxgyLnoCbZMjp7ECtyP BC6+76c9H5oRm1KF46szMxhrKW33P3GlZrNNbvbgMs6OWAhZk+hPPU+h/BFgz8cf3oXb 5acw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=0CW8fl/D3h0La/y7ceQMJJxHvOS+i5m2gp54cvRwmnk=; b=DMuAlGk1CcAkyw2APbxSTL96eeDUU3Ff+ZyJ9BCoYOxpH1AhMlg8fFd9GO9SQNzEsB Tcf9IG9+8WaxoKXhdkF8TEmqLDEGAveZS/KSE+OX0hqtCEk1gjlnGWZvgnIp1ib/w07a mhwuGIo3zx8fTIG9p6m7TOBZ9WCUeEnXNASXTKPYBbcfI/mAP+tOO5NcOrPPuraHwj+N kQirrYcAAPqUMrHG17gGcioOlPU6KFBKBmgtY0J1tQKxK4ERPyyDF1vAMPnhB+9464Pi CHgdxL/qccF7r0Pv63PjkmTAjJ8t8Kt562DE79GwWIEd2UC2abYuaxSwVIyDMXyU6Ylq uUPg== X-Received: by 10.180.107.162 with SMTP id hd2mr24593wib.0.1358201002327; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:22 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.87.230 with SMTP id bb6ls1612290wib.12.gmail; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.201.1 with SMTP id a1mr108665444eeo.3.1358201001569; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.201.1 with SMTP id a1mr108665443eeo.3.1358201001544; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com (mail-ee0-f42.google.com [74.125.83.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9si5372150eeo.1.2013.01.14.14.03.21 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of so.cool.ogi@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.42; Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b47so1890835eek.29 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.223.135 with SMTP id v7mr235084201eep.41.1358201001413; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.127.7 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:03:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <88bd2464-6efd-4252-9ff6-7c4f68f79e89@googlegroups.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:03:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: criteria for the dictionary From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_Fr=F6jd?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: so.cool.ogi@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of so.cool.ogi@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=so.cool.ogi@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b66fa1b390a6804d346d09f X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b66fa1b390a6804d346d09f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2013/1/14 la gleki > > > On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:55:12 PM UTC+4, jongausib wrote: >> >> If there's someday is going to be a complete, official lojban dictionary, >> I think there's a need for some criteria for what jbovlaste should contain >> and in which form. >> >> Right now the dictionary is rather finite, but with more contributors it >> could expand to an extreme extent. >> I think it's a good idea to discuss this issue now, so I don't contribute >> with a lot of valsi now, and then a few years later someone delete a lot of >> my work, because they don't fit into some future official template or list >> of criteria. >> >> *Vocabulary* >> 1. Should we try to add lujvo for all places of each gismu as distinct >> valsi, like {seldri}, {selbai}, {terni'i} etc? >> >> 2. What kind of cmene/cmevla should be added? (with no restriction this >> set could be extremely large) >> >> For example, we could add recommendation that you only should add cmene >> that could be regarded as having a lexicographical value, like the most >> common names of persons, companies, geographical entities etc. Not the name >> of the street where you are living and shit like that. >> >> 3. What kind of fu'ivla should be added? >> >> With ALL names of species and chemical substances and other large sets, >> we are going to have a very huge dictionary. >> I've been trying to translate some names of species into lujvo (the >> solution I prefer) > > > I know two guys who are against anything that is non-jvajvo. > > > >> , but the latin names are often not very descriptive and/or logical, so I >> think one of the better solution (at least for names of species etc, you >> use relative often) is to just lojbanize the latin names into fu'ivla. >> >> You'll probably already discussed this a lot, but it would be nice to >> have some guidelines documented somewhere about standards. I believe lojban >> standards about biology, chemistry, music theory and other scientific >> disciplines, doesn't belong to the official grammar of lojban (as little as >> Oxford style manual is normative for ALL kind of English language), but >> still it would be nice to have such guidelines (on a level below the >> official language). Especially jbovlaste need such guidelines if we don't >> want to have an inconsistent dictionary with a dukse of words in a possible >> future. >> > > .ie CLL 2.0 must have guidelines of lojbanising Latin names. An algorithm > (like the one we have for gismu) would be an ideal solution. > .iesai Doesn't sound so difficult really. Why not having an algorithm translating IPA to lojban for all languages, so for every phone (phonetics) you translate it into the most lojbanic phonematic counterpart? > > > >> 4. When is it ok to add a stage-4 fui'vla in the dictionary? >> >> I know some lojbanist don't like stage-3 fu'ivla. I do like stage-3. The >> prefix in the stage-3 fu'ivla help you understand a little what this >> foreign word is about. And you could make distinctions easily between for >> example {spatrvanila}, {grutrvanila} "vanilla pod", {tsijrvanila} "vanilla >> seed" and {xukmrvanila} vanillin. >> > > The best stage3 fu'ivla are fu'ivla that allow dropping their prefix with > the resulting word still being grammatical. > > >> The only stage-4 fu'ivla I add are those which are very cultural >> specific, not easily constructed as a lujvo and/or which doesn't easily fit >> into some cathegory. Stage-4 fu'ivla should also be useful. CLL says: >> "[stage-4] are used where a fu'ivla has become so common or so important >> that it must be made as short as possible." >> >> But as long as you don't add stage-4 without cause (what's the cause of >> making {konjaku} a stage-4 for example? I've never heard of this species >> before), I think those fu'ivlas could really give a good flavor to the >> language, even if this at the same time means that we're going to learn a >> lot of inconsistent words just like learning natlangs. But stage-4 fu'ivlas >> could be really cool, my favourites are {iklki} and {fi'ikca}. >> >> *Form* >> I think jbovlaste should have a consistent format before publishing a >> printed version. Some poor fellow would therefore have to read through all >> jbovlaste and edit it into a consistent format just before printing. But if >> we would have guidelines from now on already, and we all add valsi in the >> same way, there are going to be less work for someone in the future. >> >> 1. Form of definition >> Which format do you think should be standard? >> >> {nerkla}: >> a. n1=k1 enters n2=k2 from origin k3 via route k4 using means/vehicle k5 >> >> b.x1=n1=k1 enters x2=n2=k2 from origin x3=k3 via route x4=k4 using >> means/vehicle x5=k5 >> >> c. x1 enters x2 from origin x3 via route x4 using means/vehicle x5 >> >> 2. Etymology >> I suggest that we don't add etymology info in the notes, but use the "add >> etymology"-link in jbovlaste. >> >> I think etymology should be mandatory for cmevla and fu'ivla, so you can >> discuss which language to borrow from. >> This is a paranthetical but important question if lojban has ambition to >> be as cultural neutral as possible. >> So one recommendation could be that you always use latin for names of >> species, the language most related to the specific cultural >> phenomena/object (or a derivate of languages if many cultures share the >> same phenomena/object, or in that case maybe esperanto). >> >> 3. How much info in the notes? >> >> And also a final question: Is it possible for a user to edit another >> user's notes in jbovlaste, to add info? >> >> 4. Experimental gismu/cmavo >> I think that's BPFK job to consider if these words ever are going to be >> official. How does the procedure looks like for this? >> >> mu'omi'e jongausib >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/q1A1agoy5koJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --047d7b66fa1b390a6804d346d09f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2013/1/14 la gleki <= ;gleki.is.m= y.name@gmail.com>


On Monday, January 14, 2013 4:55:12 PM UTC+4, jon= gausib wrote:
If there's someday= is going to be a complete, official lojban=20 dictionary, I think there's a need for some criteria for what jbovlaste= =20 should contain and in which form.

Right now the dictionary is rather= finite, but with more contributors it could expand to an extreme extent.I think it's a good idea to discuss this issue now, so I don't co= ntribute with a lot of valsi now, and then a few years later someone delete= a lot of my work, because they don't fit into some future official tem= plate or list of criteria.

Vocabulary
1. Should we try to add lujvo for all places of ea= ch gismu as distinct valsi, like {seldri}, {selbai}, {terni'i} etc?
=
2. What kind of cmene/cmevla should be added? (with no restriction this= set could be extremely large)

For example, we could add recommendation that you only should add cmene= that could be regarded as having a lexicographical value, like the most co= mmon names of persons, companies, geographical entities etc. Not the name o= f the street where you are living and shit like that.

3. What kind of fu'ivla should be added?

With ALL names of s= pecies and chemical substances and other large sets, we are going to have a= very huge dictionary.
I've been trying to translate some names of s= pecies into lujvo (the solution I prefer)

I know two guys who are against anything that is = non-jvajvo.

=A0
, but the latin names are often not very descriptive and/or logical, so I t= hink one of the better solution (at least for names of species etc, you use= relative often) is to just lojbanize the latin names into fu'ivla.

You'll probably already discussed this a lot, but it would be nice = to have some guidelines documented somewhere about standards. I believe loj= ban standards about biology, chemistry, music theory and other scientific d= isciplines, doesn't belong to the official grammar of lojban (as little= as Oxford style manual is normative for ALL kind of English language), but= still it would be nice to have such guidelines (on a level below the offic= ial language). Especially jbovlaste need such guidelines if we don't wa= nt to have an inconsistent dictionary with a dukse of words in a possible f= uture.

.ie CLL 2.0 must have guidelines of = lojbanising Latin names. An algorithm (like the one we have for gismu) woul= d be an ideal solution.

.iesai Doesn't sound= so difficult really. Why not having an algorithm translating IPA to lojban= for all languages, so for every phone (phonetics) you translate it into th= e most lojbanic phonematic counterpart?

=

4. When is it ok to add a stage-4 fui'vla in the dictionary?
I know some lojbanist don't like stage-3 fu'ivla. I do like stage-= 3. The prefix in the stage-3 fu'ivla help you understand a little what = this foreign word is about. And you could make distinctions easily between = for example {spatrvanila}, {grutrvanila} "vanilla pod", {tsijrvan= ila} "vanilla seed" and {xukmrvanila} vanillin.

The best stage3 fu'ivla are fu&#= 39;ivla that allow dropping their prefix with the resulting word still bein= g grammatical.


The only stage-4 fu'ivla I add are those which are very cultural sp= ecific, not easily constructed as a lujvo and/or which doesn't easily f= it into some cathegory. Stage-4 fu'ivla should also be useful. CLL says= : "[stage-4] are used where a fu'ivla has become so common or so i= mportant that it must be made as short as possible."

But as long as you don't add stage-4 without cause (what's the = cause of making {konjaku} a stage-4 for example? I've never heard of th= is species before), I think those fu'ivlas could really give a good fla= vor to the language, even if this at the same time means that we're goi= ng to learn a lot of inconsistent words just like learning natlangs. But st= age-4 fu'ivlas could be really cool, my favourites are {iklki} and {fi&= #39;ikca}.

Form
I think jbovlaste should have a consistent format before= publishing a printed version. Some poor fellow would therefore have to rea= d through all jbovlaste and edit it into a consistent format just before pr= inting. But if we would have guidelines from now on already, and we all add= valsi in the same way, there are going to be less work for someone in the = future.

1. Form of definition
Which format do you think should be standard?<= br>
{nerkla}:
a. n1=3Dk1 enters n2= =3Dk2 from origin k3 via route k4 using me= ans/vehicle k5

b.x1=3Dn1=3Dk1 enters x2=3Dn2=3Dk= 2 from origin x3=3Dk3 via route x4=3Dk4 using m= eans/vehicle x5=3Dk5

c. x1 enters x2 from origin x3 via r= oute x4 using means/vehicle x5

2. Etymology
I suggest that we don't add etymology info in the n= otes, but use the "add etymology"-link in jbovlaste.

I thi= nk etymology should be mandatory for cmevla and fu'ivla, so you can dis= cuss which language to borrow from.
This is a paranthetical but important question if lojban has ambition to be= as cultural neutral as possible.
So one recommendation could be that yo= u always use latin for names of species, the language most related to the s= pecific cultural phenomena/object (or a derivate of languages if many cultu= res share the same phenomena/object, or in that case maybe esperanto).

3. How much info in the notes?

And also a final question: Is it = possible for a user to edit another user's notes in jbovlaste, to add i= nfo?

4. Experimental gismu/cmavo
I think that's BPFK job to c= onsider if these words ever are going to be official. How does the procedur= e looks like for this?

mu'omi'e jongausib







--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/q1A1agoy5koJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--047d7b66fa1b390a6804d346d09f--