Received: from mail-la0-f63.google.com ([209.85.215.63]:52993)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDUNF3UDXIJBBE7F2KDQKGQEJ74S3LY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TuvRz-0004Av-Lr; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:36:52 -0800
Received: by mail-la0-f63.google.com with SMTP id fq12sf2101037lab.28
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:36:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from
         :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type
         :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=fTAc8vtEqDcZmRFFS2MXPqQwJ9G0F2bdG8mvdj3mV6I=;
        b=N60vIKGN1eP9OySwExqzg1Jr9gom7Vz08mK96XI+hp2zQNicPlhMtdUe36wCsegf4Y
         ZTfNxPcxjY1gnCc9jnLIG/kzwocb6N9w2q+pFKdZYTjQWlQa6pLmjIzkxaE9lvBfRhAM
         hFt2meopv5G/Qi77xLCMbeXYQ9eJpBssS50e6znqaIotI8M+67PU3ZwWBgVsF0gfE/kU
         1Yk+Zo/2RhagUdrFyrw8g6hCutpCEGErm3Zx9+iLToee4AiRXarHv+HcFpCOWzk9GLvg
         FwiKXOTrcJC9mOaYVQgoMHTNWmH8O092+8f3IEXQ1a1hM3o9UnXZf/A5PRWzqAgmLrmj
         vSYg==
X-Received: by 10.180.100.228 with SMTP id fb4mr111680wib.17.1358213779421;
        Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:36:19 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.105.162 with SMTP id gn2ls1780251wib.44.canary; Mon, 14
 Jan 2013 17:36:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.14.179.198 with SMTP id h46mr108994920eem.4.1358213778659;
        Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:36:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.14.179.198 with SMTP id h46mr108994919eem.4.1358213778645;
        Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z44si5505086een.0.2013.01.14.17.36.18
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119;
Received: from samsa (brln-4dbaa7d9.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.167.217])
	by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 06E55865053
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:36:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:36:17 +0100
From: Michael Goerner <mgoerner@uni-osnabrueck.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] criteria for the dictionary
Message-ID: <20130115013617.GI23808@samsa.fritz.box>
References: <88bd2464-6efd-4252-9ff6-7c4f68f79e89@googlegroups.com>
 <20130114133131.GD23808@samsa.fritz.box>
 <CAKv2tT5v-O3VgorGktHNxX8wArHuPdqUKPEF6G_fDsLrgoq0Wg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yaap9KN+GmBP785v"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKv2tT5v-O3VgorGktHNxX8wArHuPdqUKPEF6G_fDsLrgoq0Wg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess
 record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:55:02PM +0100, Sebastian Fröjd
    wrote: > It would also be a shorter way to start contributing (well you can
    > contribute anyway ofcourse, but I think you do a better work when you're
    > familiar with the discussions). [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid


--yaap9KN+GmBP785v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:55:02PM +0100, Sebastian Fr=C3=B6jd wrote:
> It would also be a shorter way to start contributing (well you can
> contribute anyway ofcourse, but I think you do a better work when you're
> familiar with the discussions).

I agree, the way in which information is presented in the community
isn't really compatible with newcomers contributing.
However, I'm quite sure you wouldn't be the first one trying to implement
a "working" platform that would quickly become as "useless", in this regard=
s,
as the rest.

> But still, if no one read "mail that long"
> does that mean all proposals must be short? Or is it even possible for
> someone non-BPFK to come with proposals?

What do you mean by "proposals"?

One of the last discussions recently made clear, that _there should not
be any proposals_ at the moment. None will be accepted or rejected official=
ly.
They will, however, be ignored by most(if not all) of the people in the bpf=
k.
Take a look at glekis many tries to convince yourself.

If you really want to contribute to the language, either help fixing the CLL
or write (formally very strict) proposals for cmavo definitions for the byf=
y.
Before that part is done, you wouldn't even know, what exactly you
would like to change, because there is no reference stating what is the case
right now!


v4hn

--yaap9KN+GmBP785v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlD0spEACgkQMBKLZs4+wjx+3ACfT9O9SVHoHmogtGqtD0EqAr6r
DdsAoKCYzAcnFOQ68sVRa1CEa6KTXRjv
=T5TO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yaap9KN+GmBP785v--