Received: from mail-lb0-f185.google.com ([209.85.217.185]:42305)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDUNF3UDXIJBBDHK2KDQKGQEIZFODWI@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TuvcD-0004Db-26; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:47:09 -0800
Received: by mail-lb0-f185.google.com with SMTP id l5sf1937503lbo.12
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:46:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from
         :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type
         :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=+lgRRnBXmD8SExLtK+GJ4mqmATZ5rN3Y217V9ryoKHA=;
        b=WnGtd6yXHpxine9H982OC//HljiLqgKQRPfQRH5i5uX/Jg4yJwLYo8YswZMuhx58qy
         /6+iF5lYvzEWSnhdJaQ1Upo7myJn7+xjY/1NgduqBPAQofq2iSqxGE/Y+nqsV9NVO9eS
         jN9UW2/QaFY/emRXXuhVuf4ZfjpT9QZ9R7SI7woZ2zd8aS/7r7Gc3TBLHd96h04gyOMr
         3k96jKBHCua7kKjWbqSv+ioxm+jMr7MK6mwzl0R5kGdHPCvCchln4gljgMOcIPTr38LF
         4ir4kfbw4/cAgnlyF9bTtW9RqtM7/c9ycK4NVt9RlWe8DHwonMp5asuXzt/aP7AvLYHr
         h+2A==
X-Received: by 10.180.109.136 with SMTP id hs8mr118126wib.10.1358214412450;
        Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:46:52 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.19.101 with SMTP id d5ls1744879wie.37.canary; Mon, 14 Jan
 2013 17:46:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.14.208.198 with SMTP id q46mr109168197eeo.0.1358214411906;
        Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:46:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.14.208.198 with SMTP id q46mr109168196eeo.0.1358214411895;
        Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9si5509729eeo.1.2013.01.14.17.46.51
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119;
Received: from samsa (brln-4dbaa7d9.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.167.217])
	by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3E0E1865053
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:46:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:46:51 +0100
From: v4hn <me@v4hn.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: criteria for the dictionary
Message-ID: <20130115014650.GJ23808@samsa.fritz.box>
References: <88bd2464-6efd-4252-9ff6-7c4f68f79e89@googlegroups.com>
 <a865402c-866c-4360-bfd0-2bfc3a0e7656@googlegroups.com>
 <CAKv2tT7R4koTbuUhBcqSE+9zEx8p2KG91M7sxhGgvhthpqO_oA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K4LMwn8CgX2KMboP"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKv2tT7R4koTbuUhBcqSE+9zEx8p2KG91M7sxhGgvhthpqO_oA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess
 record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /


--K4LMwn8CgX2KMboP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:03:21PM +0100, Sebastian Fr=C3=B6jd wrote:
> 2013/1/14 la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
> > .ie CLL 2.0 must have guidelines of lojbanising Latin names. An algorit=
hm
> > (like the one we have for gismu) would be an ideal solution.

That "must" is surely your opinion.
Also CLL 2.0 seems to be your favorite keyword for every change
_you_ would ever like to see happen. Over the last year you more
or less proposed a complete rewrite.

> .iesai Doesn't sound so difficult really. Why not having an algorithm
> translating IPA to lojban for all languages, so for every phone (phonetic=
s)
> you translate it into the most lojbanic phonematic counterpart?

It's probably not as simple as this, because not every sequence of letters
is allowed in lojban. No idea if this is a problem with latin, but then,
why would you want to restrict something like that to latin?


v4hn

--K4LMwn8CgX2KMboP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlD0tQoACgkQMBKLZs4+wjzofwCcDvdRKke6j7Q8IawRJMTbt1FG
EQIAni4tVzlbFLcKqY1pce1Y6LY33/9c
=qGam
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--K4LMwn8CgX2KMboP--