Received: from mail-vb0-f55.google.com ([209.85.212.55]:52703) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TvCm6-0002ma-Du; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:36 -0800 Received: by mail-vb0-f55.google.com with SMTP id ff20sf328996vbb.20 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam:x-authority-analysis :x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LMhg4IY9xlPCNSLz/h5UDN9LnnEbRSG9zi0AIwLaeIw=; b=FOVkLg/6AVGbbOIYUSQeH5b3CitAdywCZqiFpu7rDqzBCN4n7tX4bzmVYLu2uY9WiA sResEzychK3bvRwtF5P7WaywRWrMRgHfH/X0BDtA9prwV1w3dpX2/Aa0uCCOGtwACPLJ JwOSbCjkqtSi0HBW/LbIFfXvluaan5ub28DealsPB4TPBhLwvnzjugN2TVhbsyVBdhiU 0GEqR9Mv7bHWCPJwa0/clU9xtPl0SAvMxC6KtkUMLVbZiZA6HPTO//WVfd9Rn7CJAOzN KBp1F2tKBYbVu+HYsJxtWcIqdRTsrGkjGIkCRDT1bq/bjWpWqlHjpsZeStgbhy/X9s8a zqKQ== X-Received: by 10.49.94.129 with SMTP id dc1mr16635131qeb.22.1358280375378; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:15 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.50.98 with SMTP id b2ls442464qeo.19.gmail; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:14 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.224.72.199 with SMTP id n7mr56404608qaj.5.1358280374956; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:14 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.224.72.199 with SMTP id n7mr56404607qaj.5.1358280374946; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from eastrmfepo101.cox.net (eastrmfepo101.cox.net. [68.230.241.213]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id eb7si2067769qcb.3.2013.01.15.12.06.14; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:06:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.213 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.213; Received: from eastrmimpo306 ([68.230.241.238]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20130115200614.NWOR2891.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo306> for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:06:14 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([98.169.148.216]) by eastrmimpo306 with cox id oL6E1k0024gNKFm01L6EnH; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:06:14 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020207.50F5B6B6.00DB,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=TqZkdUrh c=1 sm=1 a=oMUrf2L0cPa+6Alu0knKiQ==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=SJCSFAJPKO0A:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=CJjBoNtZY68A:10 a=13rhuqSodFaJFjBcKSIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=GmZ-bzXZ4-8oM-g4:21 a=hD211eZnQp_7IHPA:21 a=oMUrf2L0cPa+6Alu0knKiQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <50F5B6B6.6090602@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:06:14 -0500 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] criteria for the dictionary References: <88bd2464-6efd-4252-9ff6-7c4f68f79e89@googlegroups.com> <20130114133131.GD23808@samsa.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.213 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Sebastian Fr=F6jd wrote: > Sure, I will try to contribute but first I would like to know the > frames. What to do and don't, and in what form. And consistency is a > good thing in my opinion. > Secondly I don't have a lot of time to read through all maillist either, Nobody else does either, which is why this low priority topic is not=20 going to get decided. > so probably the wheel is being invented many times over and over again. Good. The founders had ideas on such topics, but we hardly have a=20 monopoly on good ideas, and it is good that we no longer have the=20 authority to insist on ours. Reinventing the wheel is only a problem when the reinvention is=20 non-productive. Word-making is never non-productive, as long as the=20 word is well-formed and usefully defined. The rules for being=20 well-formed are in CLL (which BTW allows for experimental cmavo but not=20 experimental gismu. Use a fu'ivla, and if you think it is important=20 enough to be a gismu, THEN (and only then) consider making it a Type 4=20 fu'ivla, and use the experimental fu'ivla rafsi if you need to make=20 compounds. If new gismu are ever added, it will likely be that the most=20 used type-4s will be considered.). > I tried to read backwards through the maillist once, but I soon give up, > and the BPFK section is good but incomplete. BPFK is working only on cmavo and CLL. Anything else is premature. > With a better forum (like wordpress or similar) organised in separate > topics, it would be easier to find the information you're looking for, > and then it would also be a shorter way to start contributing (well you > can contribute anyway ofcourse, but I think you do a better work when > you're familiar with the discussions). No one has time to be familiar with all of the discussions. The mailing=20 list is at least searchable. So is the wiki. > So with little time to read all mails, my strategy is simply to write > down all of my questions/propositions in the same mail and learn from > the response I get. Most people who could answer your questions won't read a long email.=20 Though marking the post with topic "several questions" might help catch=20 attention. A small number of questions is more likely to get answered. >Sorry for that. But still, if no one read "mail that > long" does that mean all proposals must be short? Proposals are being officially ignored, regardless of how long they are. I think some people are adding proposals to various wiki pages in hopes=20 that they will someday be considered, but "someday" is still far off. > Or is it even possible for someone non-BPFK to come with proposals? It isn't even possible for someone *IN* BPFK to submit proposals on=20 topics not being addressed. There aren't even procedures for doing so. lojbab --=20 Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.