Received: from mail-gh0-f188.google.com ([209.85.160.188]:64274) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TvD0P-0002y8-5R; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:21:24 -0800 Received: by mail-gh0-f188.google.com with SMTP id z13sf342795ghb.25 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:21:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam:x-authority-analysis :x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=eK6XRD9fjyOLl27Iw0bxEzvYKL6qESbGpAW+bvC0m8w=; b=Vmu6lAIN+4/5M8nwVsjOS/spsqGZYg+fkSQS5YZhxV67eRYVafyk/xgKHOHOwvi7N8 QpWX1iJAzR7L5I2FAMa/ZEVmgHc0ZCI4AtyQhHkNjwQHvf0zucWzUequCbi7Wf3mRbHL Et79re7IT///IzH8ZWsEH7yI4hsLYTBjou0askhw1A7Op3OYeLiok+z9XbqEO8qkY/vf 4rR5ObV9uI/N1fOZNLVYZsNbptjRbPqdYxl6JjKZpp+AnOhMyuQMaDFbXgPZNbefg2KU UAwFxFv86CjdQ/w6PFUlh+sdOwEHnmwcrG3HsRAo707GWyXQUiO86uQY/ZXNkhfkb4VV 7VJg== X-Received: by 10.49.116.34 with SMTP id jt2mr16483946qeb.38.1358281262579; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:21:02 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.85.193 with SMTP id j1ls414023qez.71.gmail; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:21:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.224.218.2 with SMTP id ho2mr56399838qab.8.1358281261655; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:21:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.224.218.2 with SMTP id ho2mr56399837qab.8.1358281261645; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:21:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net. [68.230.241.214]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id r17si2072615qcp.1.2013.01.15.12.21.01; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:21:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.214 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.214; Received: from eastrmimpo109 ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20130115202101.GZCU7113.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo109> for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:21:01 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([98.169.148.216]) by eastrmimpo109 with cox id oLM01k00o4gNKFm01LM0J7; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:21:00 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.50F5BA2C.019C,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ac/jbGUt c=1 sm=1 a=oMUrf2L0cPa+6Alu0knKiQ==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=TCguNf5P3WYA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=ihsrFBjg3AkA:10 a=gH5mO7VF-w8zbDOfwfEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=oMUrf2L0cPa+6Alu0knKiQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <50F5BA2D.3040007@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:21:01 -0500 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] What is the source of gismu *definitions*? References: <50F3199A.7070903@lojban.org> <4819711.3S0A6CIIJm@caracal> In-Reply-To: <4819711.3S0A6CIIJm@caracal> X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.214 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Pierre Abbat wrote: > I would be interested in knowing the etymologies of words that were deleted > from the official gimste, such as "gumri" and "sicpi". As to the place > structures, I'd find the choice of the irregular ones, such as "mitre" and > "lanme", interesting. They likely are in the etymology text file. If they aren't, I can probably manually look them up, though it is non-trivial. mitre should be obvious. The word "meter" is officially international. The choice of the final "e" was arbitrary, but probably was chosen in part to respect the British spelling convention for visual word recognition. lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.