Received: from mail-vb0-f56.google.com ([209.85.212.56]:59491) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TvD61-00030o-Ec; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:27:15 -0800 Received: by mail-vb0-f56.google.com with SMTP id s24sf345312vbi.1 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:26:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf :x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam:x-authority-analysis :x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=NWLXQ+FI3Nk9A1n3IHqf9WKQCwel/fUbhNohC40pUpw=; b=DHA2DsMnHP/aVrDGoKsGaorbwcOiXG1dRmxcO979awCaVFZwBaT5YAKeCpIuNLgYbm etFlsYd5l3mxYHs/Y6We+1jIFb1k+UWglHWvgdxcgsq/1rH7pO3GFa3XWSaloLEKMgVf WjDCTdG0RC7SFk2Z1MinQSGhqELg/3CjE3F8Tzl7LJsyGHgr4V/yAn7LIWfdxqdJQhpf 0VfWC1k6Oo4Ss55W46gZl8wGfTi7we2OHWaC/WfLxmNbPeg9zlSTyRKNP2YSEvYyUJrV gga/HBB+9CFVbhaX3vnNjjE7DlHgpWVxFvCE2mGupa/++BQjGcgb1FUQ6LwZLAU23MdC Ex5w== X-Received: by 10.49.28.162 with SMTP id c2mr680703qeh.41.1358281605646; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:26:45 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.127.174 with SMTP id nh14ls457108qeb.28.gmail; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:26:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.224.72.199 with SMTP id n7mr56442281qaj.5.1358281605079; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:26:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.224.72.199 with SMTP id n7mr56442279qaj.5.1358281605050; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net (eastrmfepo103.cox.net. [68.230.241.215]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id fg3si2073720qcb.2.2013.01.15.12.26.44; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.215 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.215; Received: from eastrmimpo110 ([68.230.241.223]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20130115202644.YSTB23841.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo110> for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:26:44 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([98.169.148.216]) by eastrmimpo110 with cox id oLSV1k00n4gNKFm01LSgAG; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:26:42 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020209.50F5BB83.0005,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=N5Wr5hBB c=1 sm=1 a=oMUrf2L0cPa+6Alu0knKiQ==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=TCguNf5P3WYA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=ihsrFBjg3AkA:10 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=Rgc_EGMBMfHD_F8cEFUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HDMjJrb_xYoA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=oMUrf2L0cPa+6Alu0knKiQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <50F5BB75.10509@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:26:29 -0500 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] What is the source of gismu *definitions*? References: <4819711.3S0A6CIIJm@caracal> <4009941.cZG2SFj3HY@caracal> In-Reply-To: <4009941.cZG2SFj3HY@caracal> X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.215 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Sunday, January 13, 2013 19:36:20 Jonathan Jones wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: >>> As to the place structures, I'd find the choice of the irregular ones, >>> such as "mitre" and "lanme", interesting. >> >> Really? Because I just find them annoying. (The irregularity, that is.) > > The *source* of the irregularity is what I'd find interesting. The irregularity > itself is annoying. I just realized that this part of the question was about place structures and not about etymologies. Apologies. The source of the irregularity is that there wasn't a lot of concern with regularity when words were first coined. I made several passes over several years attempting to find and fix irregularities. I did this on my own, not seeking or needing any approval, since places structures were not baselined. Then, I think in 1997, the community/membership voted to baseline place structures and specifically said that they no longer wanted me to make changes, even corrections. So there have been no such fixes, and none are anticipated. lojbab -- Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.