Received: from mail-fa0-f58.google.com ([209.85.161.58]:62250) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Twi8V-0002oK-4L; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:47:56 -0800 Received: by mail-fa0-f58.google.com with SMTP id v9sf2275569fav.13 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:47:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:x-received:received-spf:date:from :to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=J01mz/UEdHu60f1+v6Lkqn7tYyT2PLufArYd1vv6W10=; b=Tig8fiNVNXjmL8XLMOJckYf3JsfaixM4QKZ9MToVNvj7hVXjzkkXUlU9Frcf1u0ydi 871kqxkpB62hMv84iXjiO4vrT97DTElKTUO8Z4C+8k8dBYDTzpumDeQtTOdtATPVQOZK geAOZhwvSer8n6SL1O5vc0v4ZONif2fhDTQd3w92pz4qJ47b6VjGvCLQup5Kz+jmUNBB GNy1TSVCc2MwY9WiFbE3sYrX9fJmS4PSJ7ujZo1QYbSI5aoACjHQoNNkjBCsnSFWlROX qc8CTjhFdfRNBfGubgSKlCeNRu4z5yquGnMPwmWAh1au1y6qT1+LC5fJls8sdJr/KuzS bHww== X-Received: by 10.180.100.97 with SMTP id ex1mr1431104wib.21.1358639255219; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:47:35 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.82.195 with SMTP id k3ls833916wiy.17.gmail; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:47:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.224.201 with SMTP id x49mr15827793eep.5.1358639253660; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:47:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.14.224.201 with SMTP id x49mr15827791eep.5.1358639253640; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:47:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from dd17822.kasserver.com (dd17822.kasserver.com. [85.13.138.119]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z44si2772412een.0.2013.01.19.15.47.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:47:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.138.119; Received: from samsa (brln-4dba888f.pool.mediaWays.net [77.186.136.143]) by dd17822.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9126B865024 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:47:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:47:32 +0100 From: v4hn To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] da and existence Message-ID: <20130119234732.GV23808@samsa.fritz.box> References: <1358635318.19803.YahooMailNeo@web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2vfFyZRy2guiefOI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 85.13.138.119 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --2vfFyZRy2guiefOI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 05:53:04PM -0500, Luke Bergen wrote: > mmm, so it's more of an "exists in our universe of discourse" not > necessarily "exists in the actual universe". Is that something like > correct? Yes. That's something completely different, but as John pointed out, a fairly common misunderstanding. A question remains, whether "our universe of discourse" here means "the whole UD" - whatever that means - or whether this UD is dynamic and may change with context. I believe the latter is the case and I've only seen arguments for the dynamic answer up to now. Is there anyone, who thinks there is just one possible UD? If not, then I don't see any reason to discuss this. {u'i} > And actually, in {da poi m[i] pensi ke'a} (if I am thinking about unicorns), > wouldn't da be assigned to "unicorns" since I'm saying "that thing about > which I am thinking". Depends on whether you use an intensional or an extensional reading. I'm sure there's more than one opinion on that. At least you're not expressing anything about the fact that {da} refers to some unicorn/s in your head.. In my opinion it doesn't refer to unicorns, but to an object in the UD which only has the property that you think about it (up to now). Given that John doesn't allow 'anonymous objects' w.r.t. the UD "in the semantics game", he has to provide a different answer. v4hn --2vfFyZRy2guiefOI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlD7MJQACgkQMBKLZs4+wjzwJQCdFVxmHk+I/Sijbz4O90ZGzbEH ETsAn3UxR8xwclN/T7rTWo/3lB4qeYwC =ZXom -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2vfFyZRy2guiefOI--